You could make the case in court while on trial for tax evasion that the income tax in unconstitutional, but the jury will still find you guilty and court would still sentence you to prison.
Further, good luck ever getting SCOTUS to ever take a case on this, or getting the backing to spend at least $100,000 plus in legal fees.
Hello Agent Smith. Many have gone off Not Guilty per Jury Trials by using this as evidence and other things too that we don't have to pay taxes. Taxation is theft. Is theft legal?
Many have gone off Not Guilty per Jury Trials by using this as evidence and other things too that we don't have to pay taxes.
OK, then there should be detailed step-by-step 100% working howtos around. What exact preconditions necessary, what exact documents, witnesses, arguments, code articles numbers you need, how exactly properly apply all that in the court so judge could not arbitrary dismiss your stuff, how to answer to any questions prosecutor and judge could ask and so on.
Not fucking youtube videos, not fucking forum posts about somebody somwhere once upon a time, but straight detailed step-by-step instructions written in human language without juridical yddish.
I'm not an US citizen, but it will be very interesting for me to study basic principles and strategy of fast and guaranteed winning such cases in courts with judges and prosecutors whose salary depends on taxes I don't want to pay.
Taxation is theft. Is theft legal?
Anything that was legislated by legal authorities is legal. Theft, eating babies, fucking frogs, not fulfilling pre-election promises, usury, whatever shit those who write and pass the laws want to be legal.
You should never mix justice with enfocement of honest and morally apropriate ways of doing things and resolving disputes accepted by your people. Former is based only on what some not close to you people in power made in laws for people like you, latter is based on moral principles shared by people you live among. In courts you meet with justice, unfortunately.
I can't verify fact or fiction on this, but this guy claims to have an exact list and detailed instructions of which forms to file and how to deal with local authorities after your license is de-registered and your only ID is your passport. The detailed info and step-by-step process is not divulged on the site though - one apparently signs up for the free course through email.
Interesting link, thank you. At least dude have some links to exact code articles and stuff. But still too many narrow places, so it is more the question of luck, than something solid.
One thing I didn't get really, is why a book named "Black's Law Dictionary" used as an argument for bureaucrats? As far as I found, this is just a dictionary of juridical terms, without any signs of official acceptance. It is not some legislated, voted, signed official dictionary, just some lawyer or juridical scholar tried to systematize words often used in laws and other judridical stuff. Or I missing something and this book is recognized by courts as official document, so definitions in it have power of law and have to be accepted by courts undoubtfully?
The tax scheme is not based on uniform commercial code as your link suggests; it has operated independently and defeated all UCC arguments, as Becraft noted long ago IIRC.
Filing a bunch of UCC papers merely mucks up a record but doesn't accomplish the testimony necessary to overcome mistaken presumptions of income. The site's going two years is no indicator of eventual success in actual goals. Find people who have been doing it for a lifetime. Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence, and this can be backed up with specifics from IRS instructions as I said. There are thousands hacking at the branches of evil without any effect.
You could make the case in court while on trial for tax evasion that the income tax in unconstitutional, but the jury will still find you guilty and court would still sentence you to prison.
Further, good luck ever getting SCOTUS to ever take a case on this, or getting the backing to spend at least $100,000 plus in legal fees.
Hello Agent Smith. Many have gone off Not Guilty per Jury Trials by using this as evidence and other things too that we don't have to pay taxes. Taxation is theft. Is theft legal?
OK, then there should be detailed step-by-step 100% working howtos around. What exact preconditions necessary, what exact documents, witnesses, arguments, code articles numbers you need, how exactly properly apply all that in the court so judge could not arbitrary dismiss your stuff, how to answer to any questions prosecutor and judge could ask and so on.
Not fucking youtube videos, not fucking forum posts about somebody somwhere once upon a time, but straight detailed step-by-step instructions written in human language without juridical yddish.
I'm not an US citizen, but it will be very interesting for me to study basic principles and strategy of fast and guaranteed winning such cases in courts with judges and prosecutors whose salary depends on taxes I don't want to pay.
Anything that was legislated by legal authorities is legal. Theft, eating babies, fucking frogs, not fulfilling pre-election promises, usury, whatever shit those who write and pass the laws want to be legal.
You should never mix justice with enfocement of honest and morally apropriate ways of doing things and resolving disputes accepted by your people. Former is based only on what some not close to you people in power made in laws for people like you, latter is based on moral principles shared by people you live among. In courts you meet with justice, unfortunately.
https://www.onestupidfuck.com
I can't verify fact or fiction on this, but this guy claims to have an exact list and detailed instructions of which forms to file and how to deal with local authorities after your license is de-registered and your only ID is your passport. The detailed info and step-by-step process is not divulged on the site though - one apparently signs up for the free course through email.
Again, I cannot verify this isn't bonkers.
Interesting link, thank you. At least dude have some links to exact code articles and stuff. But still too many narrow places, so it is more the question of luck, than something solid.
One thing I didn't get really, is why a book named "Black's Law Dictionary" used as an argument for bureaucrats? As far as I found, this is just a dictionary of juridical terms, without any signs of official acceptance. It is not some legislated, voted, signed official dictionary, just some lawyer or juridical scholar tried to systematize words often used in laws and other judridical stuff. Or I missing something and this book is recognized by courts as official document, so definitions in it have power of law and have to be accepted by courts undoubtfully?
The tax scheme is not based on uniform commercial code as your link suggests; it has operated independently and defeated all UCC arguments, as Becraft noted long ago IIRC.
Filing a bunch of UCC papers merely mucks up a record but doesn't accomplish the testimony necessary to overcome mistaken presumptions of income. The site's going two years is no indicator of eventual success in actual goals. Find people who have been doing it for a lifetime. Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence, and this can be backed up with specifics from IRS instructions as I said. There are thousands hacking at the branches of evil without any effect.