Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

26
16th Amendment (to collect taxes) was never legally ratified and pushed through illegally therefore it's null and void. Income tax remains unconstitutional and can be defeated in Court very easily. (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by LightBringerFlex 1 year ago by LightBringerFlex +32 / -6
82 comments share
82 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (82)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– SaltyJollyRoger 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

detailed step-by-step 100% working howtos around.

https://www.onestupidfuck.com

I can't verify fact or fiction on this, but this guy claims to have an exact list and detailed instructions of which forms to file and how to deal with local authorities after your license is de-registered and your only ID is your passport. The detailed info and step-by-step process is not divulged on the site though - one apparently signs up for the free course through email.

Again, I cannot verify this isn't bonkers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Interesting link, thank you. At least dude have some links to exact code articles and stuff. But still too many narrow places, so it is more the question of luck, than something solid.

One thing I didn't get really, is why a book named "Black's Law Dictionary" used as an argument for bureaucrats? As far as I found, this is just a dictionary of juridical terms, without any signs of official acceptance. It is not some legislated, voted, signed official dictionary, just some lawyer or juridical scholar tried to systematize words often used in laws and other judridical stuff. Or I missing something and this book is recognized by courts as official document, so definitions in it have power of law and have to be accepted by courts undoubtfully?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The tax scheme is not based on uniform commercial code as your link suggests; it has operated independently and defeated all UCC arguments, as Becraft noted long ago IIRC.

Filing a bunch of UCC papers merely mucks up a record but doesn't accomplish the testimony necessary to overcome mistaken presumptions of income. The site's going two years is no indicator of eventual success in actual goals. Find people who have been doing it for a lifetime. Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence, and this can be backed up with specifics from IRS instructions as I said. There are thousands hacking at the branches of evil without any effect.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SaltyJollyRoger 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Herein I answered all the essential tax-related questions in one sentence

I read through your response quite intently and I'm unable to identify which sentence was supposed to achieve this. Are you by any chance a person that has been doing this a lifetime? And you mentioned IRS instructions, but I don't see those either. I'll be honest. I'm very confused about all this, and it seems fishy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SwampRangers 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Sorry, here it is.

I've been "doing it" (analyzing the law) for over 20 years, but that's obviously not part of the Swamp Rangers.

IRS instructions are on their website. Anyone analytical will note that the IRS instructions and website and the associated regs and laws are themselves very fishy. The fact that there's a constant unrestrained movement deriding the IRS as fishy, for a thousand invalid reasons and maybe a couple legit ones, indicates that the law is sufficiently vague to merit judicial notice. I realized this fishiness, without any help from any false argument, when I was still a minor; so you could say I've been doing it for a lifetime; but my primary questions were answered only after sufficient research.

If confused, step one is always to know and ask the Lord. Based on how he guides, ask away. Consider whether Americans legally ceded their sovereignty or whether they didn't and must act on the sovereignty bequeathed to them by taking responsibility. If Americans never made themselves slaves of the state, they must do due diligence to reclaim their heritage. It's not easy, and it takes a lifetime of small victories to get where you desire to go in your sovereignty, but it's much easier than at most any other time or place in history, as long as you don't fall for the state's lies that it "entitles" you rather than you controlling it.

I came here to spread truth, and so this truth is one that I direct people to among many. Due to prior agreements, I'm not at liberty to set up a teaching seminar here. Yet. But if you want a homework assignment, find a form from a third party that you may have received in a January (that's an "information return") and find the box(es) that indicate that an amount of money was paid in a certain category (that's testimony). Then begin your research into whether that third party had its testimony accurate, and means of correcting inaccuracies. I believe that one can relentlessly pursue truth until any question is answered, so the submission of honest confusion will always reward the patient.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SaltyJollyRoger 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thank you so much for your patient explanation. I know I can be a little retarded from time to time because I'm sometimes easily thrown off by trivialities. I'm quite confused as to the exact nature of the voluntary taxation system as well as my relationship with said system, so I greatly appreciate any and every thing that you can tell me.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– 2rainbows 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Due to prior agreements, I'm not at liberty to set up a teaching seminar here. Yet. But if you want a homework assignment, find a form

Shoud I ask you to send me a PM to explain... What :) you are talking about?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy