What if all of humanity is a single entity - a single "spirit" that lives as one human, dies and is reborn as another human over and over until the spirit experiences the sum of all human existence. In one lifetime this spirit finds itself as the rapist, in the next life the spirit finds itself as the rape victim. It finds itself as the king in one life and serf in the next, as the communist dictator in on round and gulag prisoner in another, corrupt judge and defendant. This spirit, which is both you and i, experiences all cause and effect of humanity.
Im this example life is entirely fair and deserving as the spirit experiences both action and consequence. The most horrific acts imaginable are but the spirit acting upon itself as the horrors delivered in one lifetime are the horrors received in the next.
The point? Perhaps this is all a trial for the spirit to come to the self realization of its wrongs and previous departing from God. Maybe at the end of this the human spirit will experience the sum total of all human lives at once and transcend into something else. Or maybe this is some perpetual self-deserving hell that is inescapable due to past sins we are unaware of.
What do you think?
I think that what you describe is possible. It would not be entirely out of left field for what I have experienced, but I would offer a slightly different take.
We are all of one spirit (God) and it is a consciousness that is creative + curious + chaotic and orderly. It does not know everything at once, rather it exists in a perpetual state of existing. It has immense powers over its imagination and all it imagines is capable of influencing it and causing it to dream a new thought or future. Along the way it imagined time and cause and effect and setup a massive self-propelled system that would develop infinite life potential but through a process of rules governed by space, time, energy, and potential. The god imagined time but it was not without all the right ingredients that time coalesced into a wondrous sight.
Beholding the creation imagined by it, it starts to get new ideas as it observes its own creation and subtly infuses the new ideas back into the design and through a mutual observation and manifestation process the god create the universe.
In this universe we were imagined as a form of creator that not only would abide by the rules of the universe, but too have the power of consciousness and self awareness and free will. And through us the universe observes itself from within much as the god observes itself from heaven beyond the universe.
And so we are all one, but separate as well. We are meant to experience the inner space of this world through various consciousness points, and god is always observing the entirety of itself beyond and is simultaneously being that same universe.
WE (suggested pluralism) contradicts all (perceivable) separating itself into each one (perception) within.
Variety implies life; point implies death...hence different life sentences towards same point of death.
Aka being holding onto suggested creationism by consent, while ignoring to be set apart within whole.
This is an old variation of even older non-dual "truth" that states all is one, all is an illusion (while being "real") and eventually we all self-realize again being One.
True? Most likely.
But it is just a model.
What is outside that model?
a) Can one model (form) outside energy (flow)?
b) MODEL, noun (Latin modulus, modus) - "pattern of something to be made; any thing of a particular form".
What if a partial can only exist within whole?
c) What if outside implies side (momentum) within out (motion) for those within (matter). Does one exist in-between (life) sides (inception/death)?
ION implies action; ILLUDO implies reaction....ignoring perceivable for suggested makes former illusive under the curtain of latter.
Hey look at that, we can actually all agree on something.
Hu/hue/color implies a spectrum within whole and entity/einai/being implies being within aka partial within whole.
Hue-man implies a setting apart into entities aka from whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
Spirit (Latin spiro; to breathe) implies effect (expression; exhale) within cause (impression; inhale). All implies cause; each one within implies effect.
Reborn implies ones RE-sponse to being BORN, hence life implying rebirth. Few suggest "born again" to tempt many to believe in a "second coming".
All cannot be summarized, for it is all which sets itself apart into each one within. Few are summarizing/collectivizing many aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) or tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) or abrahamism (father of multitude) or united states, united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union or equality through diversity etc.
It's a trick...nature sets apart; those within tempt together.
Consequence (life) within action (inception towards death) needs to breathe (spirit; spiro) aka adapt to being enacted upon as reaction.
Being implies sentenced to life, while being moved from inception towards point of death...few suggest points to tempt many to ignore sentence.
All suggested progressivism tempt towards outcome; while one ignores being (perception) within origin (perceivable).
That implies one trying (trial) to move forwards (for); while ignoring to be resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death), hence already being moved.
If God implies all, then each one implies a partial within all, hence a division (de) of partials (part) from; out of; within, and in response to whole.
EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power"...if all implies one within energy; then what else could sustain being?
The idea actually crossed my mind before. It could be.
What happens if suggested idealism crosses the flow of perceivable inspiration through ones perceiving mind/memory?
What if ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a double-cross?
I always gives thanks for just being...I'm appreciative of the fact that there is creation and my soul is a part of it. The alternative is nothingness, non existence which is unfathomable.
There's no doubt that we were created by a higher being and the fact that we have individuality and freewill is the greatest of all possibilities that could exist.
a) What if it's all way (inception towards death) which gives each one being (life)?
b) What if one cannot give without ignoring that all was already given before one came to be within?
c) To thank implies to respond to what came before...what if ones being implies response-ability within all that comes before/for being?
a) What if all generates (inception towards death), while each one within alternates (life)?
b) What if nothing (Latin nihilo) implies ones de-nial of everything perceivable for suggested nihil-ism?
c) What if fathom; verb - ""to embrace, surround, envelop" implies each one within all? What if ones ignorance of perceivable for suggested tempts one to also ignore self discernment; hence becoming unable to fathom being one within all?
Where is that "no" which can't be doubted and how could free will of choice be prevented from doubting the existence of "no; not; nothing; nothingness"?
What if suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) into a dualism (in-dual) by consenting to hold onto the suggestion of another one...a chosen one?
a) Who suggests "free will" without "of choice" and what happens if ones consents to suggested free will without of choice?
b) What if free implies within dominance; will/want implies within need; of implies out of, hence within and in response to; and choice implies within balance?