There are enough proteins in shrimp, but the point is are there enough fats in it. Fats should make about a third of your caloric intake. Shrimps are very low in fats - 0.2g per 100g (as much as they have carbs).
You'll need to eat a shit ton of shrimp a day to not suffer malnutrition in the long run. Why not just use animal fat or olive oil and make your food taste much better beside not killing yourself with the diet?
You'll need to eat a shit ton of shrimp a day to not suffer malnutrition in the long run.
False. I eat about 1 kg of frozen shelled shrimp every two weeks, which is about 70 grams per day. I eat two handfuls of rice for every one handful of shrimp. The cost for organic shrimp is about 17 USD per 2 weeks. You do not know what you are talking about
Protein is limited to about 1/3 of energy, but there is no such thing as carb poisoning. Thus one may get most of the rest from carbs.
Why not just use animal fat or olive oil
Fat is harder to digest and carries fat-soluble toxins. Concentrated plant fats were not part of the ancestral diet. There is no such thing as hypoallergenic fat. Thus it is completely unsuitable for an elimination diet.
Storing carbs to survive the winter is something even squirrels do; humans certainly did so.
I doubt the cardiovascular healthiness of high-fat "paleo" diets for non-Inuits; see psychologist Seth Rich's death from (probably) butter overconsumption.
Protein poisoning (also referred to colloquially as rabbit starvation, mal de caribou, or fat starvation) is an acute form of malnutrition caused by a diet deficient in fat and carbohydrates, where almost all bioavailable calories come from the protein in lean meat.
Are you serious? The link you gave literally states what I was saying: rabbit meat is low on fat and it still is 3.5g per 100g while shrimp is 10 times less - 0.3g per 100g. You don't get enough fats eating lean meat, let alone shrimp.
You need sufficient fats in your diet and carbs aren't a substitute.
You eat about 0.2g of fats per day from shrimp and another 0.4g from rice = 0.6g. A healthy adult requires 45–78 grams of fat each day - that's 100 times less fats than you require. I don't know how long you've been going like this but you're starving yourself.
The link you gave literally states what I was saying
Clearly you are logically impaired. The quote states:
diet deficient in fat and carbohydrates
If it were or, you would be correct.
Icebound Inuits consume no starches, which is one viable extreme. The other extreme is my method, which consumes minimal fat. Both are viable. One does not rabbit starve if one has carbs, because rabbit starvation only occurs when "almost all bioavailable calories come from the protein in lean meat."
Your claim on the amount of fat necessary to live is unsupported and false.
Icebound Inuits consume no starches, which is one viable extreme. The other extreme is my method, which consumes minimal fat. Both are viable.
No they are not interchangeable. You can cut off all carbs (keto) but you can't cut off almost all fats. There's a limit on how low on fat you can get before getting malnutrition. Why? Because carbs are only used for energy while fats are essential building blocks for your body. You are not a plant. If you can't research the science behind that claim on your own there's no saving you. Sadly, one of the symptoms of fat starvation is brain function deterioration so you've entered a vicious cycle. Here's what your article says:
In Appian's Roman History, Volume I, Book VI: The Wars in Spain, Chapter IX, page 223, the author notes a multitude of Roman soldiers dying of severe diarrhea after eating mostly rabbits while besieging the city Intercatia in approx 150 B.C. Appian wrote:
... strange terror in the Roman camp. Their soldiers were sick from watching and want of sleep, and because of the unaccustomed food which the country afforded. They had no wine, no salt, no vinegar, no oil, but lived on wheat and barley, and quantities of venison and rabbits' flesh boiled without salt, which caused dysentery, from which many died.
They ate wheat (carbs) and lean meat (protein) but no fats and that made them sick.
A World War II-era Arctic survival booklet issued by the Flight Control Command of the United States Army Air Forces included this emphatic warning: "Because of the importance of fats, under no conditions limit yourself to a meat diet of rabbit just because they happen to be plentiful in the region where you are forced down. A continued diet of rabbit will produce rabbit starvation -- diarrhea will begin in about a week and if the diet is continued DEATH MAY RESULT."
There are enough proteins in shrimp, but the point is are there enough fats in it. Fats should make about a third of your caloric intake. Shrimps are very low in fats - 0.2g per 100g (as much as they have carbs).
You'll need to eat a shit ton of shrimp a day to not suffer malnutrition in the long run. Why not just use animal fat or olive oil and make your food taste much better beside not killing yourself with the diet?
False. I eat about 1 kg of frozen shelled shrimp every two weeks, which is about 70 grams per day. I eat two handfuls of rice for every one handful of shrimp. The cost for organic shrimp is about 17 USD per 2 weeks. You do not know what you are talking about
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_poisoning
Protein is limited to about 1/3 of energy, but there is no such thing as carb poisoning. Thus one may get most of the rest from carbs.
Fat is harder to digest and carries fat-soluble toxins. Concentrated plant fats were not part of the ancestral diet. There is no such thing as hypoallergenic fat. Thus it is completely unsuitable for an elimination diet.
Storing carbs to survive the winter is something even squirrels do; humans certainly did so.
I doubt the cardiovascular healthiness of high-fat "paleo" diets for non-Inuits; see psychologist Seth Rich's death from (probably) butter overconsumption.
Are you serious? The link you gave literally states what I was saying: rabbit meat is low on fat and it still is 3.5g per 100g while shrimp is 10 times less - 0.3g per 100g. You don't get enough fats eating lean meat, let alone shrimp.
You need sufficient fats in your diet and carbs aren't a substitute.
You eat about 0.2g of fats per day from shrimp and another 0.4g from rice = 0.6g. A healthy adult requires 45–78 grams of fat each day - that's 100 times less fats than you require. I don't know how long you've been going like this but you're starving yourself.
Clearly you are logically impaired. The quote states:
If it were or, you would be correct.
Icebound Inuits consume no starches, which is one viable extreme. The other extreme is my method, which consumes minimal fat. Both are viable. One does not rabbit starve if one has carbs, because rabbit starvation only occurs when "almost all bioavailable calories come from the protein in lean meat."
Your claim on the amount of fat necessary to live is unsupported and false.
No they are not interchangeable. You can cut off all carbs (keto) but you can't cut off almost all fats. There's a limit on how low on fat you can get before getting malnutrition. Why? Because carbs are only used for energy while fats are essential building blocks for your body. You are not a plant. If you can't research the science behind that claim on your own there's no saving you. Sadly, one of the symptoms of fat starvation is brain function deterioration so you've entered a vicious cycle. Here's what your article says:
They ate wheat (carbs) and lean meat (protein) but no fats and that made them sick.