Don't be deceived by the doctrines of Gnostic New Age religions
(pomf2.lain.la)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
a) Gnostic/gnostos/gno - "to know" implies ones perception, which suggested gnostic-ism tempts one to ignore.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies religion (Latin religio; to bind anew), which in return tempts one to ignore being free will of choice.
c) Deceit aka de (divide) capere (to take) implies ones free will of choice taking suggested by consent, which divides one within a conflict of reason against others.
d) Doctrine/doctor aka docere (to show) + dek (to take) implies others showing suggestions and ones consent taking it.
Furthermore; phonetically a doct-or aka docked oar implies a vessel restricted from steering aka ones free will of choice binding self to another.
False knowledge, just like Sophia's false light that is identified with her alter ego's Isis, Ishtar, Venus and Lucifer!
Gnostics worship Sophia who is Venus/Lucifer, and the Demiurge (false creator god) who is Saturn/Satan.
https://www.reddit.com/r/occult/comments/18rxvrr/the_identity_of_lucifer_could_it_be_sophia/?rdt=48725
a) Reason (true vs false) can only be applied within edge (life) of known (inception towards death). In other words...only within perceivable can one reason about suggested.
b) Know implies need; true vs false implies want vs not want, while ignoring need.
Nature doesn't offer true or false; only change. Those within wield the free will of choice to ignore change (perceivable) while reasoning (true vs false) over definitions (suggested), hence definite/affixed.
a) Light implies motion; being within spectrum of visible light implies being matter within momentum of motion.
b) "identified" implies identical/same; which tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
Spectrum implies differentiation within same light aka into rays/race of light.
c) "with" implies within and being within implies differentiated from outside...not identical.
Aka words; names; nouns; definitions...tempting one to hold onto aka affix words, while ignoring to be within motion of sound.
Consenting to a definition implies "deaf phonetician" aka one who ignores sound aka one who ignore to be within sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
PHI (to love) LO (logic/reason) SOPHIA (knowledge)...reasoning (love vs hate) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then) of moving knowledge. Reason keeps ones mind captive in conflict against another, and it's ones free will of choice to ignore implication (perceivable) for reason (suggested).
a) De (divide) capere (to take) implies ones consent to take suggested; which divides one against another within a conflict of reason.
b) All perceivable implies full; while ones consent to suggested implies empty, hence ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
hue-man (color of man) implies a setting apart of light into spectrum, while accord (coming into agreement) implies a binding together of that which nature set apart.
Ones accord permits another to pull ones strings.
Again...ment/mind within el/all implies a setting apart; which accord/agree-ment contradicts.
a) Anointed one (christ) implies each one set apart from one another, while breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) within whole aka breath of all through each one.
b) World/vault implies matrix/mother/momentum for each being set apart within, hence father (motion) mother (momentum) off-spring (matter).
c) Suggested nihil-ism (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Can you describe the spirit of "nothing"? Or how about this...how does one christen/baptize "nothing"?
Nature offered us the ultimate Truth in form of the only true divine Godhead Jesus Christ, who changed the whole world with his light while dying for all our sins.
It's your free will of choice to reject the ultimate Truth of Yahshua HaMashiach, and sell your soul to the devil for earthly fame and riches.
True vs False implies undeniable facts that you don't wanna seem to hear, which leads to the point where you are ignoring the need to know our creator God's ultimate Truth.
I'm not sure the Gnostics were as bad, nor as misaligned with Christianity as you think
Research the Baphomet worshiping homo Knights Templars, their Gnosticism was horrible.
Check out all of Tracy Twyman's books.
Christianity is the only religion that has resulted in genocide on three continents. Some Christians are fucking evil.
Buddha says, the self is what is unchanging. He derives it by logic.The cosmogenesis of the gnostics dervies from the Vedas.
Only allow yourself to be deceived by the Bible instead, right,
Says the Jacobin luciferian Wolf in Sheeple clothing!
Repent you devil worshiper, because YAHshua HaMashiach is King of kings!
Christianity is the Jews revenge upon Rome aka the white, western world
The God of the Bible is an evil tyrant. The human spirit will break free and prevail.
"House-builder, you're seen! You will not build a house again. All your rafters broken, the ridge pole destroyed, gone to the Unformed, the mind has come to the end of craving." -Shakyamuni Buddha
The Lord Jesus Christ who is the only True Divine Godhead got murdered by tyrannical godless pagans.
You are dissing the God of the Bible, but your false satanic religion literally worships Asura demons, buddy.
Your fake ass pagan temples are full of horned demons, and the Dalai Lama is a wicked pedo who is tongue licking innocent children!
I didn't worship anyone. I seek liberation apart from any monster god. Amituofo 🙏