a) Gnostic/gnostos/gno - "to know" implies ones perception, which suggested gnostic-ism tempts one to ignore.
False knowledge, just like Sophia's false light that is identified with her alter ego's Isis, Ishtar, Venus and Lucifer!
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. Colossians 2:8 ESV
Gnostics worship Sophia who is Venus/Lucifer, and the Demiurge (false creator god) who is Saturn/Satan.
“In antiquity and reality, Lucifer, or Luciferus, is the name of the angelic Entity presiding over the light of truth as over the light of the day. In the great Valentinian gospel Pistis Sophia it is taught that of the three Powers emanating from the Holy names of the Three Tριδυνάμεις, that of Sophia (the Holy Ghost according to these gnostics – the most cultured of all) resides in the planet Venus or Lucifer.” Madame Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine (Vol. 2, p. 512)
a) Reason (true vs false) can only be applied within edge (life) of known (inception towards death). In other words...only within perceivable can one reason about suggested.
b) Know implies need; true vs false implies want vs not want, while ignoring need.
Nature doesn't offer true or false; only change. Those within wield the free will of choice to ignore change (perceivable) while reasoning (true vs false) over definitions (suggested), hence definite/affixed.
false light that is identified with
a) Light implies motion; being within spectrum of visible light implies being matter within momentum of motion.
b) "identified" implies identical/same; which tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
Spectrum implies differentiation within same light aka into rays/race of light.
c) "with" implies within and being within implies differentiated from outside...not identical.
Sophia, Isis, Ishtar, Venus and Lucifer
Aka words; names; nouns; definitions...tempting one to hold onto aka affix words, while ignoring to be within motion of sound.
Consenting to a definition implies "deaf phonetician" aka one who ignores sound aka one who ignore to be within sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy
PHI (to love) LO (logic/reason) SOPHIA (knowledge)...reasoning (love vs hate) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then) of moving knowledge. Reason keeps ones mind captive in conflict against another, and it's ones free will of choice to ignore implication (perceivable) for reason (suggested).
empty deceit
a) De (divide) capere (to take) implies ones consent to take suggested; which divides one against another within a conflict of reason.
b) All perceivable implies full; while ones consent to suggested implies empty, hence ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
according to human
hue-man (color of man) implies a setting apart of light into spectrum, while accord (coming into agreement) implies a binding together of that which nature set apart.
Ones accord permits another to pull ones strings.
according to the elemental
Again...ment/mind within el/all implies a setting apart; which accord/agree-ment contradicts.
spirits of the world, and not according to Christ
a) Anointed one (christ) implies each one set apart from one another, while breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) within whole aka breath of all through each one.
b) World/vault implies matrix/mother/momentum for each being set apart within, hence father (motion) mother (momentum) off-spring (matter).
c) Suggested nihil-ism (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Can you describe the spirit of "nothing"? Or how about this...how does one christen/baptize "nothing"?
Nature offered us the ultimate Truth in form of the only true divine Godhead Jesus Christ, who changed the whole world with his light while dying for all our sins.
Those within wield the free will of choice to ignore change
It's your free will of choice to reject the ultimate Truth of Yahshua HaMashiach, and sell your soul to the devil for earthly fame and riches.
Know implies need; true vs false implies want vs not want, while ignoring need.
True vs False implies undeniable facts that you don't wanna seem to hear, which leads to the point where you are ignoring the need to know our creator God's ultimate Truth.
False knowledge, just like Sophia's false light that is identified with her alter ego's Isis, Ishtar, Venus and Lucifer!
Gnostics worship Sophia who is Venus/Lucifer, and the Demiurge (false creator god) who is Saturn/Satan.
https://www.reddit.com/r/occult/comments/18rxvrr/the_identity_of_lucifer_could_it_be_sophia/?rdt=48725
a) Reason (true vs false) can only be applied within edge (life) of known (inception towards death). In other words...only within perceivable can one reason about suggested.
b) Know implies need; true vs false implies want vs not want, while ignoring need.
Nature doesn't offer true or false; only change. Those within wield the free will of choice to ignore change (perceivable) while reasoning (true vs false) over definitions (suggested), hence definite/affixed.
a) Light implies motion; being within spectrum of visible light implies being matter within momentum of motion.
b) "identified" implies identical/same; which tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
Spectrum implies differentiation within same light aka into rays/race of light.
c) "with" implies within and being within implies differentiated from outside...not identical.
Aka words; names; nouns; definitions...tempting one to hold onto aka affix words, while ignoring to be within motion of sound.
Consenting to a definition implies "deaf phonetician" aka one who ignores sound aka one who ignore to be within sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
PHI (to love) LO (logic/reason) SOPHIA (knowledge)...reasoning (love vs hate) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then) of moving knowledge. Reason keeps ones mind captive in conflict against another, and it's ones free will of choice to ignore implication (perceivable) for reason (suggested).
a) De (divide) capere (to take) implies ones consent to take suggested; which divides one against another within a conflict of reason.
b) All perceivable implies full; while ones consent to suggested implies empty, hence ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
hue-man (color of man) implies a setting apart of light into spectrum, while accord (coming into agreement) implies a binding together of that which nature set apart.
Ones accord permits another to pull ones strings.
Again...ment/mind within el/all implies a setting apart; which accord/agree-ment contradicts.
a) Anointed one (christ) implies each one set apart from one another, while breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) within whole aka breath of all through each one.
b) World/vault implies matrix/mother/momentum for each being set apart within, hence father (motion) mother (momentum) off-spring (matter).
c) Suggested nihil-ism (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Can you describe the spirit of "nothing"? Or how about this...how does one christen/baptize "nothing"?
Nature offered us the ultimate Truth in form of the only true divine Godhead Jesus Christ, who changed the whole world with his light while dying for all our sins.
It's your free will of choice to reject the ultimate Truth of Yahshua HaMashiach, and sell your soul to the devil for earthly fame and riches.
True vs False implies undeniable facts that you don't wanna seem to hear, which leads to the point where you are ignoring the need to know our creator God's ultimate Truth.