There are a lot of posts and pictures that grab attentions, but what do you think would be the definitive way to express most information in a single meme/post/documentary?
Conspiracies are many different topics, what would be the best one to share right now? What is the best way to do it?
Many of you have a lot of input to share, what would be the perfect way to do it in a single action?
What would the masses benefit from the most right now? What is the perfect message to send them?
Not to dodge the question, but after long research I have come to the unfortunate conclusion that what is very informally described as the "NPC" phenomenon is real (although there is much, much more to say about the actual nature of it).
Roughly speaking, they get their "truth" from authority. Conspiracy theorists are well familiar with this as progressives getting their truth from what is a nearly universally leftist media.
We now regrettably get confirmation on the flip side. People we thought were MAGA patriot America-First truthers come out in bewildering support of Israel and it's open genocide. And how could they possibly not get who America's Worst Enemy is? A few names are: Western Journal, Gateway Pundit, Kid Rock, and (what a letdown) James Woods.
They surely did not come to these reprehensible views through an evaluation of history and circumstances. Nor do I think James Woods is getting AIPAC campaign donations. I would suggest it came through the "authority" of the pulpits of Christian Zionists, either directly or indirectly through their circles of association. They are--without reservation in their own minds--doing God's work, what good Christians do, and serving the return of the Savior.
There are calculations that support the idea that NPCs comprise 80% of the population. To be technical about it, they are incapable of "waking up". However, for many decades they were given more or less reasonable truths--or at least tolerable attitudes--from their authorities on TV or in church. The situation would be greatly different were we to return to that state of affairs.
As a final note to directly address the question as posed, I tried for many, many years to wake people up with the most startling, surprising, fascinating and shocking truths I knew. They certainly startled, surprised, fascinated and shocked me awake. There was no effect on others, and that because that's not how it works for the vast majority of people.
Currently, I have the policy of giving the truth only to those who ask. Very, very few ask. Almost all who receive it, reject it. That's a secondary dynamic, where their subconscious judges the truth to be psychologically destabilizing. The truer it is, the more destabilizing. The easy task then is to invent a rationale to reject it.
Well, if anyone finds all that quite a demoralizing state of affairs, then you see exactly what I'm talking about. If you feel you wish to reject it, yeah, I thought so.
I'll add that NPCs aren't stupid, they're cowards. If you can make it seem as though "everyone" has woken up to the truth, they'll parrot it as well. But they'll never resist what they consider to be orthodox.
Exactly, rejecting truth is a symptom of moral failing, not intellectual.
IN'TELLECT, noun (Latin intelligo, to understand)...standing under implies failing to stand up.
Cowards implies "destitute of courage to meet danger"...what if being implies within (life) danger (inception towards death)? What if bearing continued suffering (aka courage) implies the status quo of being?
Sleight of hand: Courage the Cowardly Dog
Edit: But what about DOG? If suggested can make perceivable seem destitute through inversion; then invert it once more GOD and apply perceivable (sound) over suggested (words)...GAD, verb - "to ramble in growth; to walk about; to rove or ramble idly".
What if ones consent to suggested implies ones habitual aversion or indisposition to perceivable aka idleness...could that be the GAD of the many?