I am Muslim so forgive my ignorance but i thought Christians believe Jesus is the messiah(and trinity) and Jesus was killed by pharisees because pharisees was the most corrupt people in the world at that time. They also believe Jesus was/is the king, although whether spiritually or politically I am not sure.
Muslims believe Jesus was the messiah (a human prophet) and Jesus was killed by Romans or Romans and pharisees together. Jesus was spiritual king for Jews for that time.
So why are Christians passing this type of law. Dailywire(Zionist network) is having a civil war over this. Matt Walsh is devout evangelical while Ben Shapiro is Jewish who want to retire in Tel Aviv and Andrew Klavan is converted christian but he gets mad when you say Christ is king for some mysterious reason.
How can Christians justify banning bible? American politicians are always screaming how USA is supposed to be the bastion of freedom democracy and Christianity. So if the best protestants of USA, UK and Germany are doing this does it mean protestantism is self-hating ideology?
How can protestants debate this? Also why isn't there a debate about this? Why would catholics put up with this nonsense? Protestants already believe in a much smaller version of bible than catholics but now they are banning much of that. We need to figure out wtf is going on.
Elite Germans and Americans are now claiming if you are slapped on one cheek turn the other cheek. Well this ain't turning other cheek. Would the christian version of jesus Christ stop screaming under torture you are corrupt you left the God's path or would he just say oh you are torturing me too much I will not say anything anymore I will stop spreading my own bible have a good day. Wouldn't he say something in line of you are torturing me because Satan blinded you with all the AIPAC gold coins. I turn the other cheek but don't mistaken, I will not stop spreading god's words until all my flash is torn apart from by bones.
The issue...nature breaks itself from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception), while partials utilize suggestion to bind each other together, which they call for example RELGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Lawful (inception towards death) generates corruption (life)...hence ones struggle to sustain self.
whether spiritually or politically I am not sure.
Spiritual implies ones adaptation to origin; while political implies ones pursuit of outcome.
Muslims believe...
One who submits (muslim) consents (believe) to the suggestion of another, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable.
Matt Walsh is...Ben Shapiro is...Andrew Klavan is...
Everything was before anyone within can suggest what is...a suggestion requires ones consent to pass.
ALL (allah) was before one can suggest what is...all doesn't brand anyone Matt Walsh; Ben Shapiro; Andrew Klavan or anything else...one does be free will of choice.
mysterious reason
Reasoning over suggested conceals implication of perceivable...if one consents to it. Reason implies imbalance; implication implies balance....being implies choice. Others suggest reason to imbalance ones choice.
justify banning bible?
If one consents to suggested writing in the name of justice, then one permits another to authorize or ban what's written.
ALL (allah) implies that which JUST IS (justice)...each one within needs to adapt to that, while being tempted with wanting to ignore perceivable for each others suggestions.
ALL gives each one a free will of choice....all perceivable (need) or another ones suggestion (want). Choosing want over need establishes want vs not want aka a conflict of reason among many over the suggestions by few.
self-hating ideology?
Ideology implies suggested idealism (ideo) by another and ones consent to reason (logy) over it against others, hence love vs hate.
Consenting to another ones suggestion ignores sustenance of oneself within perceivable....many doing that benefits few.
In other words...suggested ideology tempts one to deny/ignore self for conflicts (love vs hate) against others.
How can protestants debate this?
a) PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it)
b) To protest implies ones consent to the suggestion by another; which then establishes a debate among all those consenting aka a conflict of reason.
to be...of freedom democracy and Christianity
a) Being implies free (will of choice) within dom (inance of balance) aka temporary free (life) during ongoing domination (inception towards death).
b) Democracy aka demos (people) and kratos (strength) implies the strength of an aggregated people aka suggesting few being permitted to wield consenting many.
c) Christ implies "anointed one" aka each off-spring coming to be from father through mother aka consecrated by oil/eal/fire/heat aka inflammability of kin.
why isn't there a debate
Is vs isn't implies debate aka de (divided) bate (batter) aka a conflict of reason within the mind/memory of each one consenting to anything suggested by another.
Consider this...Water vs wine implies a fictitious debate tempting one to ignore reality...thirst. There's no debate with thirst...just ones ignorance thereof when debating others.
I will not stop spreading god's words
a) ALL moves sound; ones within shape words to tempt others ones to ignore sound.
b) Suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything moves, hence tempting one to believe in cessation of motion (stop).
ALL cannot be stopped by anyone within...other ones tempt one with suggested words like "not + stop" to ignore all.
c) I implies ones claim over self, which brands other ones as "YOU" (phonetic jew)...one cannot claim anything within ALL without ignoring that ongoing ALL supplies temporal ones with everything.
Potential cannot be held onto; it needs to be expressed (life) during impression (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
until all
ALL implies beginning (inception) until end (death) for each one (life) within...others suggest the rhetoric "until all" to invert ones perception.
They aren't actual Christians, just posing as one to get elected.
Taking the aipac gold.
They are Christians and love Jewish people. They believe jews are just like them except they don't believe in the new testament. They also believe that the Jews have to rebuild the temple so the antichrist can come and sit in the throne so Jesus comes back. So basically they believe all this is prophecy, Jews are God's chosen people and thus all this must unfold and Israel can do no wrong. This helps explains how so many Zionist came to be https://www.bitchute.com/video/KklN5xAbyxDe/
I also personally believe that antisemitism is actually very low in America and intentionally being made to look worse than it is and an effort is being made to radicalize people against jews. Most people just have a problem with Zionism and the state of Israel. I think that Zionist have a vested interest in making all Jews feel hated so that they return to Israel fulfilling Jewish prophecy. In my opinion regular Jews and liberals are being manipulated to play part of the game. And Christians unfortunately are playing the role of supporting zionism. Liberals are the worst, they have a new cause every six months or so, that they cared nothing about before and won't six months or a year later. It's weird they are like robots.
At the end of the day while I believe in God, I think religious cults and globalist cults are actually running the world right now and it's insane.
And... Unfortunately if you look up the history of antisemitism laws they are typically put into place only under Communist governments..So that can give you a hint as to where they are trying to take America. These laws most likely aren't for what is happening now but what they want to do in the future. Unfortunately, communists are majority Jewish.
I am Muslim so forgive my ignorance but i thought Christians believe Jesus is the messiah(and trinity) and Jesus was killed by pharisees because pharisees was the most corrupt people in the world at that time. They also believe Jesus was/is the king, although whether spiritually or politically I am not sure.
Muslims believe Jesus was the messiah (a human prophet) and Jesus was killed by Romans or Romans and pharisees together. Jesus was spiritual king for Jews for that time.
So why are Christians passing this type of law. Dailywire(Zionist network) is having a civil war over this. Matt Walsh is devout evangelical while Ben Shapiro is Jewish who want to retire in Tel Aviv and Andrew Klavan is converted christian but he gets mad when you say Christ is king for some mysterious reason.
How can Christians justify banning bible? American politicians are always screaming how USA is supposed to be the bastion of freedom democracy and Christianity. So if the best protestants of USA, UK and Germany are doing this does it mean protestantism is self-hating ideology?
How can protestants debate this? Also why isn't there a debate about this? Why would catholics put up with this nonsense? Protestants already believe in a much smaller version of bible than catholics but now they are banning much of that. We need to figure out wtf is going on.
Elite Germans and Americans are now claiming if you are slapped on one cheek turn the other cheek. Well this ain't turning other cheek. Would the christian version of jesus Christ stop screaming under torture you are corrupt you left the God's path or would he just say oh you are torturing me too much I will not say anything anymore I will stop spreading my own bible have a good day. Wouldn't he say something in line of you are torturing me because Satan blinded you with all the AIPAC gold coins. I turn the other cheek but don't mistaken, I will not stop spreading god's words until all my flash is torn apart from by bones.
The issue...nature breaks itself from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception), while partials utilize suggestion to bind each other together, which they call for example RELGION (Latin religio; to bind anew).
Lawful (inception towards death) generates corruption (life)...hence ones struggle to sustain self.
Spiritual implies ones adaptation to origin; while political implies ones pursuit of outcome.
One who submits (muslim) consents (believe) to the suggestion of another, while ignoring to adapt to perceivable.
Everything was before anyone within can suggest what is...a suggestion requires ones consent to pass.
ALL (allah) was before one can suggest what is...all doesn't brand anyone Matt Walsh; Ben Shapiro; Andrew Klavan or anything else...one does be free will of choice.
Reasoning over suggested conceals implication of perceivable...if one consents to it. Reason implies imbalance; implication implies balance....being implies choice. Others suggest reason to imbalance ones choice.
If one consents to suggested writing in the name of justice, then one permits another to authorize or ban what's written.
ALL (allah) implies that which JUST IS (justice)...each one within needs to adapt to that, while being tempted with wanting to ignore perceivable for each others suggestions.
ALL gives each one a free will of choice....all perceivable (need) or another ones suggestion (want). Choosing want over need establishes want vs not want aka a conflict of reason among many over the suggestions by few.
Ideology implies suggested idealism (ideo) by another and ones consent to reason (logy) over it against others, hence love vs hate.
Consenting to another ones suggestion ignores sustenance of oneself within perceivable....many doing that benefits few.
In other words...suggested ideology tempts one to deny/ignore self for conflicts (love vs hate) against others.
a) PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it)
b) To protest implies ones consent to the suggestion by another; which then establishes a debate among all those consenting aka a conflict of reason.
a) Being implies free (will of choice) within dom (inance of balance) aka temporary free (life) during ongoing domination (inception towards death).
b) Democracy aka demos (people) and kratos (strength) implies the strength of an aggregated people aka suggesting few being permitted to wield consenting many.
c) Christ implies "anointed one" aka each off-spring coming to be from father through mother aka consecrated by oil/eal/fire/heat aka inflammability of kin.
Is vs isn't implies debate aka de (divided) bate (batter) aka a conflict of reason within the mind/memory of each one consenting to anything suggested by another.
Consider this...Water vs wine implies a fictitious debate tempting one to ignore reality...thirst. There's no debate with thirst...just ones ignorance thereof when debating others.
a) ALL moves sound; ones within shape words to tempt others ones to ignore sound.
b) Suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to ignore that everything moves, hence tempting one to believe in cessation of motion (stop).
ALL cannot be stopped by anyone within...other ones tempt one with suggested words like "not + stop" to ignore all.
c) I implies ones claim over self, which brands other ones as "YOU" (phonetic jew)...one cannot claim anything within ALL without ignoring that ongoing ALL supplies temporal ones with everything.
Potential cannot be held onto; it needs to be expressed (life) during impression (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
ALL implies beginning (inception) until end (death) for each one (life) within...others suggest the rhetoric "until all" to invert ones perception.
If free will of choice operates under an owner; then it would contradict itself.
I imagine it could be a few things.
I also personally believe that antisemitism is actually very low in America and intentionally being made to look worse than it is and an effort is being made to radicalize people against jews. Most people just have a problem with Zionism and the state of Israel. I think that Zionist have a vested interest in making all Jews feel hated so that they return to Israel fulfilling Jewish prophecy. In my opinion regular Jews and liberals are being manipulated to play part of the game. And Christians unfortunately are playing the role of supporting zionism. Liberals are the worst, they have a new cause every six months or so, that they cared nothing about before and won't six months or a year later. It's weird they are like robots.
At the end of the day while I believe in God, I think religious cults and globalist cults are actually running the world right now and it's insane.
And... Unfortunately if you look up the history of antisemitism laws they are typically put into place only under Communist governments..So that can give you a hint as to where they are trying to take America. These laws most likely aren't for what is happening now but what they want to do in the future. Unfortunately, communists are majority Jewish.
Or oh yeah they are being blackmailed
jews. And STILL the most corrupt satanic people in the world.
Tell us more about how Nazi Germany stopped its Eastwards expansion in 1939 and never attacked the Soviets.