Amazing. This morning's band wagon is 'Darwin=bad' because Tucker & Joe had a conversation on the topic. And this is the resulting virtue signal that we must toe the line for, now is it? I'm sorry, but is this company policy sir? Doesn't matter, I'm on my 15.
That's a strawman. Darwinism and the evolutionary myth are false and bad for society regardless of what Tucker, Joe or whoever says about them. It's an objective truth. I didn't even know it was discussed by those guys.
It’s not a bandwagon, Darwinism’s associated theories have been an anti-creation psyop and public school indoctrination tool for longer than you’ve been alive.
Look at your dogs legs. Its front legs bend the same as your arms. Their back legs bend the same as your legs. We came from the same animal before we separated. Its pretty fucking easy to see. We either ALL have souls, or none of us.
What are the odds that all us mammals have fingers, elbows, knees, all in the same format? Its impossible! If you cant see the similarities, you are straight retardo
Just because something is similar doesn't mean it's the same. Even if you take this nihilistic worldview to its ultimate end where nothing has a purpose or meaning and all complexity is merely alterations of the past and there was never a creation of intelligent design, the similarities between animals still doesn't confirm the false theory Darwinism.
Please listen carefully: a straight retardo is explaining your beliefs to you
Darwin studied birds in the Galápagos and recorded their changes over time which he attributed to natural selection, which was a nice way to say the environment culled the weakest birds.
Interestingly enough he discovered that the beak shape began to differ, as with their prey, across the islands. He literally watched and recorded a species diverge into separate subspecies.
After his death, ("scholars") coined the term "Darwinism" to explain a theory that Darwin did not hold. The theory is that ALL animals diverged from each other at some point (bc subspecies exist), and therefore all animals must have been the same species in the distant past.
The theory was debunked over time due as our understanding of archeology increased: we know of multiple mass extinction events where the fauna of our world changed entirely; this contradicts and debunks the theory of darwinism that requires a gradual change over time.
This theory had no actual support from anyone other than atheist. Unfortunately, our public edjucation is atheist. Despite the obvious evidence that the theory was bunk, massive amounts of funding and effort went into finding the "missing link between man and ape" for political and cultural reasons.
Dozens of museum displays popped up around the world showing the "missing link", hundreds of news papers read by millions of people all saw the "new discovery". It happened again and again. Every time, literally every single damn time, the discovery was later determined to be falsified or mistaken, and the museum exhibit taken down.
Ota Bega was a slave who lived in in one of those museum exhibits.
Hollywood and the entire world's media industry quickly went to work enforcing this "missing link" worldview, creating films "ape man" and "planet of the apes" (great movie btw).
This doesn't mean your dog didn't have a wolf as an ancestor long ago,
But there is 0 evidence that you and your dog had the same ancestor long ago. 0. Instead there is evidence to the contrary.
This worldview exists and persists because it has a POLITICAL EFFECT. Just look at Europe or America letting their "brothers" in. How generous.
Nihil-ism is sold by another; ones de-nial buys into it, while selling self out. Take it (want) or leave it (need)...it's ones free will of choice.
new discovery...again and again
a) Ongoing (inception towards death) reveals (life)...consenting to "new" suggestions tempts one to cover self discernment within perceivable.
b) Others suggest "again" aka "a gain" to tempt ones consent as a gain of permission.
c) GAIN, verb (Hebrew; to possess)...wanting to posses tempts one to ignore needing to potentiate. The former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter implies expression outwards.
d) Discovery implies division (dis) + to conceal by something overspread (cover). Consenting to suggested covers perceivable, while tempting one into a divisive conflict of reason against another.
exists and persists
EXpression (reaction) implies PER (by) impression (action).
Look at the legs. thats the evidence. Look at a whales fingers. Why does it need five fingers under a fin? Because We came from the same family, Maybe God made the family, but if you can't see the similarities between an ape and humans, you blind.
I have a slightly different take on this. I believe evolution is of intelligent design. When the book of Genesis describes chronological order, Man is last in line. And I believe all mammals have souls. It's my own take and I could be wrong. It could very well be that other than mammals have souls as well.
This is a distinction more people should contemplate. We are anchored to the physical by bodies, so it's easy to forget that we are not simply what's contained in flesh.
Both dogs and humans are living entities that inhabit bodies borne of material nature thus there are functional similarities, this does not mean one "came from" the other. The body is just a machine, we the living being are different from matter all together.
This observation doesn't tell you one evolved out of the other or there was a common progenitor unless you presuppose evolution. Both dog and man could have been created by the same creator as they are, who just happens to do legs that way because it makes sense to Him as an author. Just like I'd paint hands in a similar way in all my paintings.
We either ALL have souls, or none of us.
Why? What's a soul and what makes you believe every living being owns one? Humans have reason - does it follow other animals have reason too?
What tells you we're "built the same as animals", retard? Do I have to point once again your logic is flawed? Did your dog tell you it has reason? Where was the last time you reasoned with your dog? Do you even know the difference between reason and consciousness?
I know what a soul is in my worldview. I asked what you think it is and what makes you think animal souls are like human souls (if they have one)?
Spit balling here but I believe all living beings have souls but wild animal's have a soul group. Something happens to an animal's personality when It is loved. They open up in ways not known to them and their personality comes out.
Almost as if it's breaking from the soul group and becoming into its own. It's something that can be perceived in any animal following a loving relationship.
Everything he said comes with a wide array of caveats. Or to say, this is not the soul of wit.
Based. Monkey-boy darwinists are seething here.
Careful, we still have some retarded Darwin fans around here.
Amazing. This morning's band wagon is 'Darwin=bad' because Tucker & Joe had a conversation on the topic. And this is the resulting virtue signal that we must toe the line for, now is it? I'm sorry, but is this company policy sir? Doesn't matter, I'm on my 15.
That's a strawman. Darwinism and the evolutionary myth are false and bad for society regardless of what Tucker, Joe or whoever says about them. It's an objective truth. I didn't even know it was discussed by those guys.
It’s not a bandwagon, Darwinism’s associated theories have been an anti-creation psyop and public school indoctrination tool for longer than you’ve been alive.
Of course. It just started this morning. Everyone's jumping on it. But, no bandwagon. Got it.
🎵
Lol, go back to work, your 15 is up.
OK. But if this isn't policy, I'm not doing it.
Look at your dogs legs. Its front legs bend the same as your arms. Their back legs bend the same as your legs. We came from the same animal before we separated. Its pretty fucking easy to see. We either ALL have souls, or none of us.
What are the odds that all us mammals have fingers, elbows, knees, all in the same format? Its impossible! If you cant see the similarities, you are straight retardo
Just because something is similar doesn't mean it's the same. Even if you take this nihilistic worldview to its ultimate end where nothing has a purpose or meaning and all complexity is merely alterations of the past and there was never a creation of intelligent design, the similarities between animals still doesn't confirm the false theory Darwinism.
Please listen carefully: a straight retardo is explaining your beliefs to you
Darwin studied birds in the Galápagos and recorded their changes over time which he attributed to natural selection, which was a nice way to say the environment culled the weakest birds.
Interestingly enough he discovered that the beak shape began to differ, as with their prey, across the islands. He literally watched and recorded a species diverge into separate subspecies.
After his death, ("scholars") coined the term "Darwinism" to explain a theory that Darwin did not hold. The theory is that ALL animals diverged from each other at some point (bc subspecies exist), and therefore all animals must have been the same species in the distant past.
The theory was debunked over time due as our understanding of archeology increased: we know of multiple mass extinction events where the fauna of our world changed entirely; this contradicts and debunks the theory of darwinism that requires a gradual change over time.
This theory had no actual support from anyone other than atheist. Unfortunately, our public edjucation is atheist. Despite the obvious evidence that the theory was bunk, massive amounts of funding and effort went into finding the "missing link between man and ape" for political and cultural reasons.
Dozens of museum displays popped up around the world showing the "missing link", hundreds of news papers read by millions of people all saw the "new discovery". It happened again and again. Every time, literally every single damn time, the discovery was later determined to be falsified or mistaken, and the museum exhibit taken down.
Ota Bega was a slave who lived in in one of those museum exhibits.
Hollywood and the entire world's media industry quickly went to work enforcing this "missing link" worldview, creating films "ape man" and "planet of the apes" (great movie btw).
This doesn't mean your dog didn't have a wolf as an ancestor long ago,
But there is 0 evidence that you and your dog had the same ancestor long ago. 0. Instead there is evidence to the contrary.
This worldview exists and persists because it has a POLITICAL EFFECT. Just look at Europe or America letting their "brothers" in. How generous.
Nihil-ism is sold by another; ones de-nial buys into it, while selling self out. Take it (want) or leave it (need)...it's ones free will of choice.
a) Ongoing (inception towards death) reveals (life)...consenting to "new" suggestions tempts one to cover self discernment within perceivable.
b) Others suggest "again" aka "a gain" to tempt ones consent as a gain of permission.
c) GAIN, verb (Hebrew; to possess)...wanting to posses tempts one to ignore needing to potentiate. The former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter implies expression outwards.
d) Discovery implies division (dis) + to conceal by something overspread (cover). Consenting to suggested covers perceivable, while tempting one into a divisive conflict of reason against another.
EXpression (reaction) implies PER (by) impression (action).
Look at the legs. thats the evidence. Look at a whales fingers. Why does it need five fingers under a fin? Because We came from the same family, Maybe God made the family, but if you can't see the similarities between an ape and humans, you blind.
Was Ota Bega an Ape or a Human?
I have a slightly different take on this. I believe evolution is of intelligent design. When the book of Genesis describes chronological order, Man is last in line. And I believe all mammals have souls. It's my own take and I could be wrong. It could very well be that other than mammals have souls as well.
Great points. However we do not "have" souls, we a "are" souls and have bodies.
This is a distinction more people should contemplate. We are anchored to the physical by bodies, so it's easy to forget that we are not simply what's contained in flesh.
And we're build by star stuff and ours happens to be named sol
Both dogs and humans are living entities that inhabit bodies borne of material nature thus there are functional similarities, this does not mean one "came from" the other. The body is just a machine, we the living being are different from matter all together.
This observation doesn't tell you one evolved out of the other or there was a common progenitor unless you presuppose evolution. Both dog and man could have been created by the same creator as they are, who just happens to do legs that way because it makes sense to Him as an author. Just like I'd paint hands in a similar way in all my paintings.
Why? What's a soul and what makes you believe every living being owns one? Humans have reason - does it follow other animals have reason too?
Soul is life beyond the body. You should know what a fuckin soul is. Sorry if youre autistic, but come the fuck on. Whos upvoting this retard?
If we're built the same as animal, then we all either have souls or not. Maybe we all do, I dont know. But our bodies are built the same.
And of course animals have reason, you fuckwad. How do you think they hunt?
What tells you we're "built the same as animals", retard? Do I have to point once again your logic is flawed? Did your dog tell you it has reason? Where was the last time you reasoned with your dog? Do you even know the difference between reason and consciousness?
I know what a soul is in my worldview. I asked what you think it is and what makes you think animal souls are like human souls (if they have one)?
Spit balling here but I believe all living beings have souls but wild animal's have a soul group. Something happens to an animal's personality when It is loved. They open up in ways not known to them and their personality comes out.
Almost as if it's breaking from the soul group and becoming into its own. It's something that can be perceived in any animal following a loving relationship.