There has been speculation over whether or not the man who set himself on fire outside Donald Trump's hush money criminal trial on Friday in New York City is a supporter of the former president.
No what vpnsurfer is looking for is a fight the problem is he is on losing ground the media put out that headline even if the article implies something else its a way to introduce something that isn't true and they knew that before wasting text to explain it.
So yes newsweek did this on purpose and where did they even get the idea "There has been speculation"
From something like this
The man was reportedly standing inside the designated protest area for Donald Trump supporters before dousing himself with an alcohol-based, liquid substance.
There has been speculation over whether or not the man who set himself on fire outside Donald Trump's hush money criminal trial on Friday in New York City is a supporter of the former president.
I was joking about you being illiterate but holy fuck you literally cannot read can you?
NEWSWEEK YOU ROBOT MOTHERFUCKER
https://www.newsweek.com/max-azzarello-trump-supporter-everything-we-know-1892378
And again, who claims that he was a Trump supporter?
Are you retards unable to understand simple English?
The quote and article you link to state no such thing so why do you post them? Are you too fucking stupid to understand the question?
Aww you don't understand words do you? Poor child give the phone back to your mother after the John leaves
I hate to agree with vpnsurfer but you are a complete fucking dick. answer the fucking question you fag parasite.
No what vpnsurfer is looking for is a fight the problem is he is on losing ground the media put out that headline even if the article implies something else its a way to introduce something that isn't true and they knew that before wasting text to explain it.
So yes newsweek did this on purpose and where did they even get the idea "There has been speculation"
From something like this
https://www.the-sun.com/news/11139997/who-max-azzarello-trump-trial-fire/
So because he was standing in area for supporters. See they knew they had 0 proof yet wrote the headline for click bait.
Your proof it worked!
Like I give a fuck who you fucking agree with you simple cunt
I understand that the posted article does not claim that the guy was a Trump supporter. It actually heavily implies that he was a Democrat supporter.
Did you fucking cretin actually read the article?
To conclude: by stating that the media claimed that the guy was a Trump supporter, OP has demonstrated again that he is a fucking liar.
By blindly supporting this lie you have demonstrated that you are a mindless idiot who is unable to understand simple words.
I was joking about you being illiterate but holy fuck you literally cannot read can you?