I read that book: " 1666 Redemption through Sin ".
it is a badly supported , badly documented, rambling walk through the history of The Synagogue of Satan over the last three, four hundred years.
Still, it's easy to read and if you are not familiar with the stuff it's a good place to start I guess. however absolutely useless as a reference document
a) Redemption aka to purchase back from (redeem) + action (tion) tempts one to ignore that action (inception towards death) offers reactions (life) for free (will of choice).
It's the happy merchant who offers suggested "redemption" for the price of ones consent. Buying into that; sells self out.
b) Atone (at one; together) tempts one to ignore being set apart from one another.
Others suggest SIN, verb - "to depart voluntarily from the path" to tempt consenting ones together in their attempt to redeem themselves by atonement.
c) Suggested ATONE (at one; together) implies the inversion of ALONE (all in one; separation).
d) SIN/SINS/SINCE - "after" implies suggested progressivism (towards outcome), which tempts one to ignore perceivable origin moving forwards being aka BE-FORE.
Origins of Subversion
a) Origin implies direction (straight by action); being implies reaction curving (life) within straight (inception towards death) of action.
b) Subvert implies under/below (sub) + to turn opposite direction (verto; versus).
Consenting to follow suggested turns one within perceivable and against others.
c) If one ignores origin (perception) then one permits others to subvert outcomes (suggestion)
a) Perceivable sound implies reality; suggested words implies fiction...if one ignores former for latter.
b) Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound. Those within shape words to describe perceivable through suggestions, hence establishing themselves as the media/medium/medius/middle in-between reality (perceivable inspiration) and fiction (suggested information).
c) Suggested words like "insane person" are utilized by few to keep many ignorant of perceivable...in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...consenting to former conceals self within latter, while keeping one profane.
d) Words are shaped through LETTERS...a name used to distract from ones consent LETTING the suggestions by others shape fiction (words) within reality (sound).
Suggestion itself implies FI'AT. (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something"...hence tempting one to LET others do something, when consenting by free will of choice to suggested information.
broken thought processes
All perceivable processes each ones perception by internal separation of whole into partials aka a breaking down of thoughts within procession.
Whatever information others are suggesting tempts one to hold onto it within ones consenting mind/memory...meanwhile; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it implies moving partials (matter) within a whole (motion).
One can only discern self by the differences within ones surrounding, hence the same whole differentiating itself into partials to establish each ones free will of choice to discern self among one another.
tl; dr...I break apart what few tempt many to hold together, while ignoring that natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life) whatever those within hold onto.
From a different perspective...mind/memory needs to be used like a ram, yet wants to be misused like a hard-drive. The former lets perceivable inspiration through; while the latter fills itself with suggested information until capacity. It's each ones free will of choice to balance in-between need (letting go) and want (holding onto).
One cannot save nature within self while being within nature...others tempt one to try anyway. Memory needs to adapt to movement of nature; while resisting the temptation to affix thoughts; definitions; beliefs; creeds; suggested information; words; names; numbers; idols; brands etc.
you are
The origin of "you" implies one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of that claim; then the brands assigned to other ones dissolve as well.
In reality...whole (oneness) generates partials (ones), hence all being one in EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power".
Sleight of hand: "all for one; and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone aka all(in)one"
Basil Zaharoff... Sabbatean!!!
Nuclear Armed Doomsday Cult? David Livingstone's new book: Zionism History of a Jewish Heresy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NT9f2uebZk
I read that book: " 1666 Redemption through Sin ".
it is a badly supported , badly documented, rambling walk through the history of The Synagogue of Satan over the last three, four hundred years.
Still, it's easy to read and if you are not familiar with the stuff it's a good place to start I guess. however absolutely useless as a reference document
Read Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman's books
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ftUsmNcDlYxZ/
https://archive.org/details/marvin-s.-antelman-to-eliminate-the-opiate-vol-1-pdf
https://archive.org/details/antelman_to_eliminate_the_opiate_vol2
And Gershom Scholem's book, Sabbatai Ṣevi: the mystical Messiah 1626-1676 https://archive.org/details/sabbataisevimyst0000scho
Hey, thank you internet stranger.
a) Redemption aka to purchase back from (redeem) + action (tion) tempts one to ignore that action (inception towards death) offers reactions (life) for free (will of choice).
It's the happy merchant who offers suggested "redemption" for the price of ones consent. Buying into that; sells self out.
b) Atone (at one; together) tempts one to ignore being set apart from one another.
Others suggest SIN, verb - "to depart voluntarily from the path" to tempt consenting ones together in their attempt to redeem themselves by atonement.
c) Suggested ATONE (at one; together) implies the inversion of ALONE (all in one; separation).
d) SIN/SINS/SINCE - "after" implies suggested progressivism (towards outcome), which tempts one to ignore perceivable origin moving forwards being aka BE-FORE.
a) Origin implies direction (straight by action); being implies reaction curving (life) within straight (inception towards death) of action.
b) Subvert implies under/below (sub) + to turn opposite direction (verto; versus).
Consenting to follow suggested turns one within perceivable and against others.
c) If one ignores origin (perception) then one permits others to subvert outcomes (suggestion)
you are mentally ill. your broken thought processes incorrectly tell you that words are reality.
a) Perceivable sound implies reality; suggested words implies fiction...if one ignores former for latter.
b) Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound. Those within shape words to describe perceivable through suggestions, hence establishing themselves as the media/medium/medius/middle in-between reality (perceivable inspiration) and fiction (suggested information).
c) Suggested words like "insane person" are utilized by few to keep many ignorant of perceivable...in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...consenting to former conceals self within latter, while keeping one profane.
d) Words are shaped through LETTERS...a name used to distract from ones consent LETTING the suggestions by others shape fiction (words) within reality (sound).
Suggestion itself implies FI'AT. (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something"...hence tempting one to LET others do something, when consenting by free will of choice to suggested information.
All perceivable processes each ones perception by internal separation of whole into partials aka a breaking down of thoughts within procession.
Whatever information others are suggesting tempts one to hold onto it within ones consenting mind/memory...meanwhile; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it implies moving partials (matter) within a whole (motion).
One can only discern self by the differences within ones surrounding, hence the same whole differentiating itself into partials to establish each ones free will of choice to discern self among one another.
tl; dr...I break apart what few tempt many to hold together, while ignoring that natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life) whatever those within hold onto.
From a different perspective...mind/memory needs to be used like a ram, yet wants to be misused like a hard-drive. The former lets perceivable inspiration through; while the latter fills itself with suggested information until capacity. It's each ones free will of choice to balance in-between need (letting go) and want (holding onto).
One cannot save nature within self while being within nature...others tempt one to try anyway. Memory needs to adapt to movement of nature; while resisting the temptation to affix thoughts; definitions; beliefs; creeds; suggested information; words; names; numbers; idols; brands etc.
The origin of "you" implies one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of that claim; then the brands assigned to other ones dissolve as well.
In reality...whole (oneness) generates partials (ones), hence all being one in EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power".
Sleight of hand: "all for one; and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone aka all(in)one"