a) Perceivable sound implies reality; suggested words implies fiction...if one ignores former for latter.
b) Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound. Those within shape words to describe perceivable through suggestions, hence establishing themselves as the media/medium/medius/middle in-between reality (perceivable inspiration) and fiction (suggested information).
c) Suggested words like "insane person" are utilized by few to keep many ignorant of perceivable...in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...consenting to former conceals self within latter, while keeping one profane.
d) Words are shaped through LETTERS...a name used to distract from ones consent LETTING the suggestions by others shape fiction (words) within reality (sound).
Suggestion itself implies FI'AT. (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something"...hence tempting one to LET others do something, when consenting by free will of choice to suggested information.
broken thought processes
All perceivable processes each ones perception by internal separation of whole into partials aka a breaking down of thoughts within procession.
Whatever information others are suggesting tempts one to hold onto it within ones consenting mind/memory...meanwhile; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it implies moving partials (matter) within a whole (motion).
One can only discern self by the differences within ones surrounding, hence the same whole differentiating itself into partials to establish each ones free will of choice to discern self among one another.
tl; dr...I break apart what few tempt many to hold together, while ignoring that natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life) whatever those within hold onto.
From a different perspective...mind/memory needs to be used like a ram, yet wants to be misused like a hard-drive. The former lets perceivable inspiration through; while the latter fills itself with suggested information until capacity. It's each ones free will of choice to balance in-between need (letting go) and want (holding onto).
One cannot save nature within self while being within nature...others tempt one to try anyway. Memory needs to adapt to movement of nature; while resisting the temptation to affix thoughts; definitions; beliefs; creeds; suggested information; words; names; numbers; idols; brands etc.
you are
The origin of "you" implies one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of that claim; then the brands assigned to other ones dissolve as well.
In reality...whole (oneness) generates partials (ones), hence all being one in EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power".
Sleight of hand: "all for one; and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone aka all(in)one"
a) Perceivable sound implies reality; suggested words implies fiction...if one ignores former for latter.
b) Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound. Those within shape words to describe perceivable through suggestions, hence establishing themselves as the media/medium/medius/middle in-between reality (perceivable inspiration) and fiction (suggested information).
c) Suggested words like "insane person" are utilized by few to keep many ignorant of perceivable...in sanus (within sound) + per sonos (by sound)...consenting to former conceals self within latter, while keeping one profane.
d) Words are shaped through LETTERS...a name used to distract from ones consent LETTING the suggestions by others shape fiction (words) within reality (sound).
Suggestion itself implies FI'AT. (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something"...hence tempting one to LET others do something, when consenting by free will of choice to suggested information.
All perceivable processes each ones perception by internal separation of whole into partials aka a breaking down of thoughts within procession.
Whatever information others are suggesting tempts one to hold onto it within ones consenting mind/memory...meanwhile; perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto, since it implies moving partials (matter) within a whole (motion).
One can only discern self by the differences within ones surrounding, hence the same whole differentiating itself into partials to establish each ones free will of choice to discern self among one another.
tl; dr...I break apart what few tempt many to hold together, while ignoring that natural order (inception towards death) sets apart (life) whatever those within hold onto.
From a different perspective...mind/memory needs to be used like a ram, yet wants to be misused like a hard-drive. The former lets perceivable inspiration through; while the latter fills itself with suggested information until capacity. It's each ones free will of choice to balance in-between need (letting go) and want (holding onto).
One cannot save nature within self while being within nature...others tempt one to try anyway. Memory needs to adapt to movement of nature; while resisting the temptation to affix thoughts; definitions; beliefs; creeds; suggested information; words; names; numbers; idols; brands etc.
The origin of "you" implies one claiming self as "me; myself or I"; which in return brands everyone else into a "you". If one lets go of that claim; then the brands assigned to other ones dissolve as well.
In reality...whole (oneness) generates partials (ones), hence all being one in EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power".
Sleight of hand: "all for one; and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "alone aka all(in)one"