Here are screenshots of what the surf looked like at a fully swell-exposed spot on the SW coast of South Africa the last few days. Nothing unusual happened from April 9 through now.
It's strange how he assumes a massive object, and not a gravitational field, or Electromagnet field of some kind. Then he takes a 6000 foot drop in elevation by a buoy at face value? Then it just disappears, and he never mentions the potential for tsunamis.
Honestly, he seems so focused on 'thinking outside the box', that he's not considering any actual causes, or ramifications for what he is seeing.
AFAIK, Ventusky data is a MODEL (i.e. algorithm output) based on proxy data. It is NOT raw unfiltered measurement data feed.
SO, it could be a coding error also.
Would need actual real-time unfiltered raw data to confirm it was anything else but a glitch.
Remember, this is how reality is created for us : by creating simulations that mimic reality and make us think that what happens in a simulation MUST have happened in reality too. Just because it is a scientific visualization doesn't make it any less a simulation.
I'm trying really hard to look for a conspiracy here, btw... can't see one yet.
Ben @ suspicious observers covered this well this morning. His opinion is it's likely a data glitch. I think he may use some of the same information that you posted
Any even slightly unusual swell event would be noticed by surfers and surf forecasters. I don't think anything happened in terms of unusual waves in real life, but I'll check some sources. Very interesting nonetheless. The lack of bouys in that area is nothing new. That region is extremely remote, especially for US.
Here are screenshots of what the surf looked like at a fully swell-exposed spot on the SW coast of South Africa the last few days. Nothing unusual happened from April 9 through now.
https://imgur.com/a/QQMB9ez
Well that's some good follow through on tracking this information.
It's strange how he assumes a massive object, and not a gravitational field, or Electromagnet field of some kind. Then he takes a 6000 foot drop in elevation by a buoy at face value? Then it just disappears, and he never mentions the potential for tsunamis.
Honestly, he seems so focused on 'thinking outside the box', that he's not considering any actual causes, or ramifications for what he is seeing.
Much more descriptive with better theories. Yet, I've always found his video intro to be juvenile, and hard to get past.
USO the size of 1/4th of Africa? Unlikely.
Doesn't seem to form symmetrically over the tectonic fault lines of tectonic plates.
Also, doesn't map to any so far mapped anomalies of GEBCO seabed data:
https://www.gebco.net/data_and_products/gebco_web_services/web_map_service/
Some claim a big meteor strike. Close by buoy data shows nothing of interest :
https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_history.php?station=15008
https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_history.php?station=15001
AFAIK, Ventusky data is a MODEL (i.e. algorithm output) based on proxy data. It is NOT raw unfiltered measurement data feed.
SO, it could be a coding error also.
Would need actual real-time unfiltered raw data to confirm it was anything else but a glitch.
Remember, this is how reality is created for us : by creating simulations that mimic reality and make us think that what happens in a simulation MUST have happened in reality too. Just because it is a scientific visualization doesn't make it any less a simulation.
I'm trying really hard to look for a conspiracy here, btw... can't see one yet.
Ben @ suspicious observers covered this well this morning. His opinion is it's likely a data glitch. I think he may use some of the same information that you posted
Any even slightly unusual swell event would be noticed by surfers and surf forecasters. I don't think anything happened in terms of unusual waves in real life, but I'll check some sources. Very interesting nonetheless. The lack of bouys in that area is nothing new. That region is extremely remote, especially for US.
something to do with South Atlantic Anomaly and eclipse?