AFAIK, Ventusky data is a MODEL (i.e. algorithm output) based on proxy data. It is NOT raw unfiltered measurement data feed.
SO, it could be a coding error also.
Would need actual real-time unfiltered raw data to confirm it was anything else but a glitch.
Remember, this is how reality is created for us : by creating simulations that mimic reality and make us think that what happens in a simulation MUST have happened in reality too. Just because it is a scientific visualization doesn't make it any less a simulation.
I'm trying really hard to look for a conspiracy here, btw... can't see one yet.
Ben @ suspicious observers covered this well this morning. His opinion is it's likely a data glitch. I think he may use some of the same information that you posted
USO the size of 1/4th of Africa? Unlikely.
Doesn't seem to form symmetrically over the tectonic fault lines of tectonic plates.
Also, doesn't map to any so far mapped anomalies of GEBCO seabed data:
https://www.gebco.net/data_and_products/gebco_web_services/web_map_service/
Some claim a big meteor strike. Close by buoy data shows nothing of interest :
https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_history.php?station=15008
https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_history.php?station=15001
AFAIK, Ventusky data is a MODEL (i.e. algorithm output) based on proxy data. It is NOT raw unfiltered measurement data feed.
SO, it could be a coding error also.
Would need actual real-time unfiltered raw data to confirm it was anything else but a glitch.
Remember, this is how reality is created for us : by creating simulations that mimic reality and make us think that what happens in a simulation MUST have happened in reality too. Just because it is a scientific visualization doesn't make it any less a simulation.
I'm trying really hard to look for a conspiracy here, btw... can't see one yet.
Ben @ suspicious observers covered this well this morning. His opinion is it's likely a data glitch. I think he may use some of the same information that you posted