There are no "flat earthers", but there are different explanations for the eclipse than the one you believe.
The ancient indian astronomers recorded some "shadow objects" they named rahu and ketu. These dark objects obscure the light from the sun and moon periodically.
This explanation can accommodate selenelion eclipses, which yours cannot.
I work hard not to believe. Belief is the enemy of knowledge and to objective study of any kind.
Instead i work to know, or acutely recognize that i do not.
In the case of the eclipse, or the workings of the sun in general - i do not know, though i am certain that what we are taught today about it is as stupid and unscientific as its first incarnation taught in the 19th century (that the sun is a giant fart, perpetually on fire in the sky).
The "it's all an astronomical coincidence" "theory" for the moon and sun just happening to be the perfect size to cover one another (especially in the belief system where they are astronomically distant and wildly different sizes) was always notably stupid and unscientific.
They've already stated to me their conclusion is that the known world is (at least mostly) flat (or at least, that all signs point to this being the answer), which is exactly how I would describe a flat earther.
I'm not sure why they don't want to describe themselves as something that they basically are.
During Pentecost, the Holy Spirit was powred out on those who shall call on Name of the Lord. As a wonder, the Moon was turned into blood, to remind us that the sacrifice for the sins of the world had been payed.
Acts 2
The Sunne shall be turned into darkenesse, and the Moone into blood, before that great and notable day of the Lord come.
And it shall come to passe, that whosoeuer shall call on the Name of the Lord, shalbe saued.
Yee men of Israel, heare these words, Iesus of Nazareth, a man approued of God among you, by miracles, wonders, and signes, which God did by him in the midst of you, as yee your selues also know:
Him, being deliuered by the determinate counsell and foreknowledge of God, yee haue taken, and by wicked hands, haue crucified, and slaine:
Whom God hath raised vp, hauing loosed the paines of death: because it was not possible that hee should be holden of it.
Joel 2
¶ And it shall come to passe afterward, that I will powre out my Spirit vpon all flesh, and your sonnes and your daughters shall prophecie, your old men shall dreame dreames, your yong men shall see visions.
And also vpon the seruants, and vpon the handmaids in those dayes will I powre out my Spirit.
And I will shew wonders in the heauens, and in the earth, blood and fire, and pillars of smoke.
The Sunne shall be turned into darkenesse, and the Moone into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come.
And it shall come to passe that whosoeuer shall call on the Name of the Lord, shall bee deliuered: for in mount Zion and in Ierusalem shalbe deliuerance, as the Lord hath said, and in the remnant, whom the Lord shall call.
To me, it looks like the Moon is boiling, never seen a rock boil. You ask me why the Moon does not do something that it does not do? For all I know it radiates energy, cold energy, that slows down the vibration of molecules, and makes things decompose faster. How do they know that in advance? Because blood Moons appear at a predictable pattern, 14 days before, or after, the Sun and the Moon share the same space in heaven.
Believing implies ones consent to the suggested information by another. In other words...to believe implies holding onto; to be implies within need to let go off wanting to hold onto.
what do
Only energy can do...each thing within can re-do aka respond to being (life) done by (inception towards death).
will be fun
Fun implies "that which diverts and makes merry"...being will implies ones response-ability (free will of choice) within a balance based system. Fun tempts one to ignore response-ability...which in return increases sorrows (soros).
Whatever their CIA handlers tell them to believe. Flat-earthers don't exist in real life, it's just a discrediting psyop.
There are no "flat earthers", but there are different explanations for the eclipse than the one you believe.
The ancient indian astronomers recorded some "shadow objects" they named rahu and ketu. These dark objects obscure the light from the sun and moon periodically.
This explanation can accommodate selenelion eclipses, which yours cannot.
What is the explanation that you believe in?
I work hard not to believe. Belief is the enemy of knowledge and to objective study of any kind.
Instead i work to know, or acutely recognize that i do not.
In the case of the eclipse, or the workings of the sun in general - i do not know, though i am certain that what we are taught today about it is as stupid and unscientific as its first incarnation taught in the 19th century (that the sun is a giant fart, perpetually on fire in the sky).
The "it's all an astronomical coincidence" "theory" for the moon and sun just happening to be the perfect size to cover one another (especially in the belief system where they are astronomically distant and wildly different sizes) was always notably stupid and unscientific.
Pathetic
They've already stated to me their conclusion is that the known world is (at least mostly) flat (or at least, that all signs point to this being the answer), which is exactly how I would describe a flat earther.
I'm not sure why they don't want to describe themselves as something that they basically are.
During Pentecost, the Holy Spirit was powred out on those who shall call on Name of the Lord. As a wonder, the Moon was turned into blood, to remind us that the sacrifice for the sins of the world had been payed.
Acts 2
The Sunne shall be turned into darkenesse, and the Moone into blood, before that great and notable day of the Lord come.
And it shall come to passe, that whosoeuer shall call on the Name of the Lord, shalbe saued.
Yee men of Israel, heare these words, Iesus of Nazareth, a man approued of God among you, by miracles, wonders, and signes, which God did by him in the midst of you, as yee your selues also know:
Him, being deliuered by the determinate counsell and foreknowledge of God, yee haue taken, and by wicked hands, haue crucified, and slaine:
Whom God hath raised vp, hauing loosed the paines of death: because it was not possible that hee should be holden of it.
Joel 2
¶ And it shall come to passe afterward, that I will powre out my Spirit vpon all flesh, and your sonnes and your daughters shall prophecie, your old men shall dreame dreames, your yong men shall see visions.
And also vpon the seruants, and vpon the handmaids in those dayes will I powre out my Spirit.
And I will shew wonders in the heauens, and in the earth, blood and fire, and pillars of smoke.
The Sunne shall be turned into darkenesse, and the Moone into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the Lord come.
And it shall come to passe that whosoeuer shall call on the Name of the Lord, shall bee deliuered: for in mount Zion and in Ierusalem shalbe deliuerance, as the Lord hath said, and in the remnant, whom the Lord shall call.
So you think during a lunar eclipse, the moon turns into blood?
Colour of blood. Moon=plasma.
Static plasma that looks like rock? How does it maintain its shape? Why does it not radiate energy?
Magic plasma?
And sometimes it turns the color of red at the precise moment when astronomers predict a Lunar Eclipse? Why? How do they know that in advance?
To me, it looks like the Moon is boiling, never seen a rock boil. You ask me why the Moon does not do something that it does not do? For all I know it radiates energy, cold energy, that slows down the vibration of molecules, and makes things decompose faster. How do they know that in advance? Because blood Moons appear at a predictable pattern, 14 days before, or after, the Sun and the Moon share the same space in heaven.
You don't know much. Do you always just make up stuff like this? It's literally just based on your fantasies.
What did I make up? Moonlight can be converted to energy, so it radiates energy.
yep you're an idiot.
Believing implies ones consent to the suggested information by another. In other words...to believe implies holding onto; to be implies within need to let go off wanting to hold onto.
Only energy can do...each thing within can re-do aka respond to being (life) done by (inception towards death).
Fun implies "that which diverts and makes merry"...being will implies ones response-ability (free will of choice) within a balance based system. Fun tempts one to ignore response-ability...which in return increases sorrows (soros).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see:
Work (need) or play (want)...free will of choice.
This dude doesn't even know what a heart does