You’re right. No one can prove viruses exist and cause humans harm. They’re man-made toxins, not viruses. It’s a terminology issue. Nature only produces parasites and bacteria, which can/does cause humans harm. “Covid” made the idea of viruses even more retarded. The germ theory idea borders on humans landing on the moon 60+ years ago level stupidity now, and no one on this forum can prove viruses exist.
TLDR; We’re being purposefully poisoned by people through man-made toxins, food, water, air, vaccines, medications, everything.
if some bits of code can mimic the real thing, why wouldnt it be real? And if simulations didnt work, I doubt we would have computers or plastics or anything like that. (and before someone says, you need computers to run simulations dur dur). Well no, computers certainly speed the process up so we can see it in real time though.
Our senses can only see a very narrow spectrum of "what is". If we were capable of sensing all the energies that surround us every millisecond of every day, we would go insane, our puny brains could not comprehend everything.
DNA operates much on the same level as the bits in a computer work, but instead of 2 bits, you have 4.
Well how do you supposed we got to this point? Do you believe that a singular god created all this just to give us one little speck of it?
I think its more likely to be a simulation lmao, and even if it was, it wouldnt matter because we are still alive. We are the universe experiencing itself. One of those, if a tree fell in the forest type of deals.
If we really did evolve from a bunch of molecules, either from space, or just randomly appeared here. They still had to work their magic for BILLIONS of years. You can say its fake, but millions of people have dedicated their lives digging through rocks in pursuit of the truth, dont cast it all away because the organization is being gatekeeped by a higher power.
Virus's are the precursor to dna more than likely. And I always have this strange thought that they are some kind of driver to evolution as well.
"No virus" theory sets the "proof for viruses" to such level that due to the size of protein aggregates (and as such, "viruses") that no microscopy can EVER IMAGINE and thus no separation method can NEVER separate the claimed protein aggregates to the level that "NO VIRUS" camp requires.
So, as a scientific theory, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.
It may be true, may not be true, but it is NOT falsifiable AND it is not practical in helping us to avoid them poisoning us (we can call the virus protein aggregates, self-replicating peptides, m|mi|si|RNA, DNA or "viruses" - it doesn't matter - they are still poisoning us, as the statistics clearly show).
Or maybe they could inoculate cells containing the supposed virus in culture which doesn't contain other genetic material and proof its existence by following the Koch postulates.
Also, I don't believe there aren't good enough microscopes to see the virions. We have microscopes that magnify to the level of atoms. That's the worst cope I've ever heard since NASA told us they can't go back to the moon because they've lost the technology.
Atomic force and tunneling microscopes cannot imagine living things, they tear them apart and provide a single snapshot. Cannot provide identification nor sequence of things like cell entry.
Super resolution microscopes are the best we have that go anywhere near the resolution limits required to image "viruses" and they don't resolve enough.
Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.
You’re right. No one can prove viruses exist and cause humans harm. They’re man-made toxins, not viruses. It’s a terminology issue. Nature only produces parasites and bacteria, which can/does cause humans harm. “Covid” made the idea of viruses even more retarded. The germ theory idea borders on humans landing on the moon 60+ years ago level stupidity now, and no one on this forum can prove viruses exist.
TLDR; We’re being purposefully poisoned by people through man-made toxins, food, water, air, vaccines, medications, everything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kx4Y9TVMGg
if some bits of code can mimic the real thing, why wouldnt it be real? And if simulations didnt work, I doubt we would have computers or plastics or anything like that. (and before someone says, you need computers to run simulations dur dur). Well no, computers certainly speed the process up so we can see it in real time though.
https://np.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/1syr0a/how_did_engineers_work_when_computer_didnt_exist/
Our senses can only see a very narrow spectrum of "what is". If we were capable of sensing all the energies that surround us every millisecond of every day, we would go insane, our puny brains could not comprehend everything.
DNA operates much on the same level as the bits in a computer work, but instead of 2 bits, you have 4.
https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/amazing-dna/
Why am I bringing this up?
Well how do you supposed we got to this point? Do you believe that a singular god created all this just to give us one little speck of it?
I think its more likely to be a simulation lmao, and even if it was, it wouldnt matter because we are still alive. We are the universe experiencing itself. One of those, if a tree fell in the forest type of deals.
If we really did evolve from a bunch of molecules, either from space, or just randomly appeared here. They still had to work their magic for BILLIONS of years. You can say its fake, but millions of people have dedicated their lives digging through rocks in pursuit of the truth, dont cast it all away because the organization is being gatekeeped by a higher power.
Virus's are the precursor to dna more than likely. And I always have this strange thought that they are some kind of driver to evolution as well.
Any theory to be scientific, must be falsifiable.
"No virus" theory sets the "proof for viruses" to such level that due to the size of protein aggregates (and as such, "viruses") that no microscopy can EVER IMAGINE and thus no separation method can NEVER separate the claimed protein aggregates to the level that "NO VIRUS" camp requires.
So, as a scientific theory, it is NOT EVEN WRONG.
It may be true, may not be true, but it is NOT falsifiable AND it is not practical in helping us to avoid them poisoning us (we can call the virus protein aggregates, self-replicating peptides, m|mi|si|RNA, DNA or "viruses" - it doesn't matter - they are still poisoning us, as the statistics clearly show).
How do you know?
Have you singularly isolated such "toxin"?
Do you have microscope video showing such "toxin" entering the cell and causing illness?
Use the exact same criteria for "toxin" as you use for "virus" or anything below 10nm (resolving power of live imaging super resolution microscopes).
but Alas, we do agrees: They are poisoning us. We just can't "prove" with 100% certainty what "it" is that they are poisoning us with.
And in the end, it is a moot point. They are still poisoning us. That much even the raw statistics show us.
No, I use multivalued logic to reason.
I stay firmly in the "show me more proof" camp and "show me a theory that can be falsified".
Until that is shown, I stay in the excluded middle.
There are always more options than two. Most people fail to understand this.
You didn't post such thing. You need to understand how scientific proof works.
You posted a possible refutation with too much claims and no proof to back it up.
Look, I've been down that rabbit hole longer than you known it existed.
And I still haven't found proof. SO I stay in the excluded middle.
You are free to believe as you wish.
Or maybe they could inoculate cells containing the supposed virus in culture which doesn't contain other genetic material and proof its existence by following the Koch postulates.
Also, I don't believe there aren't good enough microscopes to see the virions. We have microscopes that magnify to the level of atoms. That's the worst cope I've ever heard since NASA told us they can't go back to the moon because they've lost the technology.
Atomic force and tunneling microscopes cannot imagine living things, they tear them apart and provide a single snapshot. Cannot provide identification nor sequence of things like cell entry.
Super resolution microscopes are the best we have that go anywhere near the resolution limits required to image "viruses" and they don't resolve enough.
Ok, that's good to know.
Still there is a way to isolate/purify the supposed particle they call virus and inoculate it on a healthy subject where it should cause the same symptoms of the disease. Then they should be able to get a sample from that subject and isolate/purify the same particle. If that's done in culture that doesn't contain other genetic material and drugs, then we'll have a proof of a virus according to Koch's postulates. It's never been done though.
Not a single paper.