There has been a lot of loose talk about cyber attacks being a credible cause of the last outage.
Though this article does not say for certain. As either could prevent them from continuing to transit under the bridge for differing reasons. As a ship's captain would not go to sea with mechanical issues. Alternately, he would await clearance and further assistance were it a cyber attack.
It looks to me now to be that the MV Dali was remotely piloted into the bridge and no one was on board at the time. It's an application of the old pirate saying, "Non-existent men tell no tales."
The explanation for the MV Dali power loss under that thesis is simply that the remote hijackers "flicked the lights on and off" specifically and deliberately to create the circumstances for conspiracy theories.
Here, They did it again to the APL Qingdao just to convince normies that "ships lose power next to bridges all the time". They also wish to convince conspiracists that hijackers have the ability to interfere with power on ships, when the truth is of course far beyond that.
The rumor of the "ghost vessel" has been around since just after the event itself:
At 6:30 a.m. Tuesday, U.S. Army Cyber Command (ARCYBER), which routinely monitors Deep State chatter, overheard a telephone conversation fragment between a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) official and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. On it, an anxious Buttigieg shrieks at the NTSB investigator: “Unmanned? No bridge crew? That’s not a possibility, so don’t spread it around. In fact, forget you mentioned it.”
Well, it sounds nuts and can't possibly be independently substantiated. That is, until we get this innocuous article a week later in the mainstream press:
If you examine the article carefully, you'll see there's no mention of anyone actually speaking to any member of the crew: no interviews by investigators, no comments to the press, no contacts with friends or family or port workers. (Similarly, in this APL Qingdao incident, we get a report from a tracking company from a report by a tugboat captain, not a statement from a ship's officer, company spokesperson, or investigator.)
Only one person single person even claims to have been aboard the Dali, in an indirect and bizarre way. I would say her statement is weird because it was made-up and she's a bad liar:
The NTSB's chair Jennifer Homendy did not say when the crew of the Dali would be allowed to leave, but said they had electricity and food, and appeared to be settling into life aboard the ship.
Why would they not have electricity and food? Why would they have to "settle in"? They live aboard this ship or similar vessels for weeks or months at a time, do they not? Then she adds:
'The cook was cooking when I got onboard. It smelled very good.'
So this ship crashed and, rather than viewing the damage or speaking with the officers, she goes and sees what's cooking (literally)? That dumb detail was the one that was supposed to subconsciously convince us her dumb story was real.
In 2013, a story of Logan's on the 2012 Benghazi attack caused significant controversy due to factual errors and was retracted, resulting in a leave of absence
So she's a well known liar. Amazing source you have there.
Whoa bro this is almost like that time the train derailed and we started paying attention to train derailments and it seemed like they were happening more frequently!
Question! Are they currently blocking the port?
https://twitter.com/johnkonrad/status/1776786983097966862
Never mind. It has apparently been cleared to go, and is out to sea at this point:
https://www.vesselfinder.com/?imo=9461893
Other related post:
https://conspiracies.win/p/17siNusKOY/key-bridge-collision---why-was-t/c/
https://conspiracies.win/p/17siO1g9YN/a-perfect-description-that-match/c/
Electrical or mechanical? Do we think it's atmospheric or sabatoge?
There has been a lot of loose talk about cyber attacks being a credible cause of the last outage.
Though this article does not say for certain. As either could prevent them from continuing to transit under the bridge for differing reasons. As a ship's captain would not go to sea with mechanical issues. Alternately, he would await clearance and further assistance were it a cyber attack.
I appreciate your input. It is strange fer sure, I'm wondering electromagnetic stuffs possibly.
That assumes competence of the mechanical crew
I am only making assumptions of the captain's decisions, based on his current actions.
AKA baseless speculation.
It looks to me now to be that the MV Dali was remotely piloted into the bridge and no one was on board at the time. It's an application of the old pirate saying, "Non-existent men tell no tales."
The explanation for the MV Dali power loss under that thesis is simply that the remote hijackers "flicked the lights on and off" specifically and deliberately to create the circumstances for conspiracy theories.
Here, They did it again to the APL Qingdao just to convince normies that "ships lose power next to bridges all the time". They also wish to convince conspiracists that hijackers have the ability to interfere with power on ships, when the truth is of course far beyond that.
The rumor of the "ghost vessel" has been around since just after the event itself:
White Hats Suggest Dali Unmanned at Time of Collision (RRN 3/27/2024)
Well, it sounds nuts and can't possibly be independently substantiated. That is, until we get this innocuous article a week later in the mainstream press:
Dali container ship crew are STILL marooned on the stricken vessel in the Baltimore harbor a week since the Frances Scott Key Bridge collapsed with no plans for them to disembark but they do now have Wi-Fi (Daily Mail 4/2/2024)
If you examine the article carefully, you'll see there's no mention of anyone actually speaking to any member of the crew: no interviews by investigators, no comments to the press, no contacts with friends or family or port workers. (Similarly, in this APL Qingdao incident, we get a report from a tracking company from a report by a tugboat captain, not a statement from a ship's officer, company spokesperson, or investigator.)
Only one person single person even claims to have been aboard the Dali, in an indirect and bizarre way. I would say her statement is weird because it was made-up and she's a bad liar:
Why would they not have electricity and food? Why would they have to "settle in"? They live aboard this ship or similar vessels for weeks or months at a time, do they not? Then she adds:
So this ship crashed and, rather than viewing the damage or speaking with the officers, she goes and sees what's cooking (literally)? That dumb detail was the one that was supposed to subconsciously convince us her dumb story was real.
Yeah, ships never lose power.
Oh, wait...
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-66151666
https://www.voanews.com/a/economy-business_massive-container-ship-runs-aground-blocks-traffic-suez-canal/6203697.html
https://www.9news.com.au/national/sydney-floods-ship-off-coast-portland-bay-rescue-wollongong/3cb0e186-be5b-41e4-a806-7898ae657656
https://safety4sea.com/evergreen-container-ship-loses-power-off-vietnam/
and many, many more.
Not certain what your point is. You gave us 2 examples of sabotage, and 2 ships at sea.
Where as we are currently discussing, 2 examples of potential cyber attacks shortly before a bridge transit, in 2 weeks time.
Completely made up. Why not aliens or gremlins?
Because Credible Sources are not citing gremlins.
Some random person on twitter is not a "credible source".
O.K. I'll play along, as clearly you are here to "increase engagement", and are not a real person.
Blagh blagh blagh. Random person?!!! Blagh blagh blah. LORA LoGaN!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lara_Logan
So she's a well known liar. Amazing source you have there.
Did you even read the article you posted there?
Are we considering wikipedia reliable now?
Do you ever think before posting?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/lara-logan-the-fox-nation-investigative-journalist-who-keeps-falling-for-antifa-hoaxes
The woman who keeps confusing jokes and satire for reality is a "credible source".
You can't make this shit up.
Oh wait. Yes you can and you are.
Humor me; Hit the down vote button on this random comment:
https://conspiracies.win/p/140w2NrqUS/x/c/4ZA2HGCx8ev
Then let me know once you have by replying to it.
Whoa bro this is almost like that time the train derailed and we started paying attention to train derailments and it seemed like they were happening more frequently!
The vast majority of train derailments are at the train yard and are minor
Massive crashes that spill toxic chemicals don't happen every week like they want us to think