It looks to me now to be that the MV Dali was remotely piloted into the bridge and no one was on board at the time. It's an application of the old pirate saying, "Non-existent men tell no tales."
The explanation for the MV Dali power loss under that thesis is simply that the remote hijackers "flicked the lights on and off" specifically and deliberately to create the circumstances for conspiracy theories.
Here, They did it again to the APL Qingdao just to convince normies that "ships lose power next to bridges all the time". They also wish to convince conspiracists that hijackers have the ability to interfere with power on ships, when the truth is of course far beyond that.
The rumor of the "ghost vessel" has been around since just after the event itself:
At 6:30 a.m. Tuesday, U.S. Army Cyber Command (ARCYBER), which routinely monitors Deep State chatter, overheard a telephone conversation fragment between a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) official and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. On it, an anxious Buttigieg shrieks at the NTSB investigator: “Unmanned? No bridge crew? That’s not a possibility, so don’t spread it around. In fact, forget you mentioned it.”
Well, it sounds nuts and can't possibly be independently substantiated. That is, until we get this innocuous article a week later in the mainstream press:
If you examine the article carefully, you'll see there's no mention of anyone actually speaking to any member of the crew: no interviews by investigators, no comments to the press, no contacts with friends or family or port workers. (Similarly, in this APL Qingdao incident, we get a report from a tracking company from a report by a tugboat captain, not a statement from a ship's officer, company spokesperson, or investigator.)
Only one person single person even claims to have been aboard the Dali, in an indirect and bizarre way. I would say her statement is weird because it was made-up and she's a bad liar:
The NTSB's chair Jennifer Homendy did not say when the crew of the Dali would be allowed to leave, but said they had electricity and food, and appeared to be settling into life aboard the ship.
Why would they not have electricity and food? Why would they have to "settle in"? They live aboard this ship or similar vessels for weeks or months at a time, do they not? Then she adds:
'The cook was cooking when I got onboard. It smelled very good.'
So this ship crashed and, rather than viewing the damage or speaking with the officers, she goes and sees what's cooking (literally)? That dumb detail was the one that was supposed to subconsciously convince us her dumb story was real.
It looks to me now to be that the MV Dali was remotely piloted into the bridge and no one was on board at the time. It's an application of the old pirate saying, "Non-existent men tell no tales."
The explanation for the MV Dali power loss under that thesis is simply that the remote hijackers "flicked the lights on and off" specifically and deliberately to create the circumstances for conspiracy theories.
Here, They did it again to the APL Qingdao just to convince normies that "ships lose power next to bridges all the time". They also wish to convince conspiracists that hijackers have the ability to interfere with power on ships, when the truth is of course far beyond that.
The rumor of the "ghost vessel" has been around since just after the event itself:
White Hats Suggest Dali Unmanned at Time of Collision (RRN 3/27/2024)
Well, it sounds nuts and can't possibly be independently substantiated. That is, until we get this innocuous article a week later in the mainstream press:
Dali container ship crew are STILL marooned on the stricken vessel in the Baltimore harbor a week since the Frances Scott Key Bridge collapsed with no plans for them to disembark but they do now have Wi-Fi (Daily Mail 4/2/2024)
If you examine the article carefully, you'll see there's no mention of anyone actually speaking to any member of the crew: no interviews by investigators, no comments to the press, no contacts with friends or family or port workers. (Similarly, in this APL Qingdao incident, we get a report from a tracking company from a report by a tugboat captain, not a statement from a ship's officer, company spokesperson, or investigator.)
Only one person single person even claims to have been aboard the Dali, in an indirect and bizarre way. I would say her statement is weird because it was made-up and she's a bad liar:
Why would they not have electricity and food? Why would they have to "settle in"? They live aboard this ship or similar vessels for weeks or months at a time, do they not? Then she adds:
So this ship crashed and, rather than viewing the damage or speaking with the officers, she goes and sees what's cooking (literally)? That dumb detail was the one that was supposed to subconsciously convince us her dumb story was real.