Soon TikTok is gone, then TG next and after that they will drive all remaining scoundrels to X and then with a single point of failure : Digi-ID , CBDC , Strong Auth all in the CIA-NSA-Globalist-X-App streamed to your 24/7 on mobile from CIALink global sat Network.
All the beautiful women will still look like emanciated zombies after they've been locked into WrongThink Re-education Camps for posting stuff like above on X.
Let's face it, we are cattle, the slaughter is coming closer and the cattle is not waking up nor resisting en mass.
Otherwise I agree, except I see the more "beautiful and successful " people going along and not resisting more frequently when compared to just normal average peoole.
I have found the beautiful-successful type to be hardest to convince as they have most to lose from their current position of relative success.
Sadly, you are likely correct. I've thought of this avenue before and the only hiccup i see is that when titays are involved, male brains shut off completely, so i'm not sure how much info would break through the mammary boundary.
TBF this is not unusual nor necessarily wrong -- humans are overcomplicated in perception in the modern era. We are over extended on what is to be human. Civilization is about who is in charge not what we do.
With this knowledge, much like Zion Don and Elon are exploiting to master the nationalist demo by mean tweeting, to lead our people to salvation from oligarch empires is by exploiting these mechanisms.
SEX (Latin seco; to divide) implies a setting apart from one another, hence male/female distinction. Selling (suggestion) tempts buying (consent) aka bringing together many consumers under few merchants.
delightful distraction
Refocusing away from the distracting cleavage, would allow one to discern that white top/black bottom implies a division (de) of light into pure light (white) and absence of light (black), hence a distraction from the visible spectrum of light, which doesn't allow those within to see either side.
the game would be different
If many consent to a suggested game by few; then each one ignores to be different from one another, while seeking to win the same game.
verbatim
Aka word for word...a suggested inversion of perceivable "sound for word". Only within sound can one shape words.
all men...
Nature implies all...the distinction of male/female within nature implies each different ONE within same ALL. Others suggest the aggregation of differences (men) under the same umbrella (all).
That's stupid. Men don't listen to what attractive women say - they just stare at them and enjoy the view while nodding. Men listen to what other smart and wise men say.
Maybe thirsty simps listen intently and worship these women because they hope it will give them a chance.
Nature has mechanisms. We prescribe to these. What you fail to understand in this context is that it is not about hearing her but competing to be recognized by her by agreeing. Competition breeds intellect.
That's called simping and it's pathetic regardless of the message the woman has. Also, women don't like men who agree with them, where do you get this stuff - gender study textbooks? Man is the leader and the woman submits, that's the natural order encoded in humans. Everything else is feminist subversion of our nature.
How old are you? Piece of advice for when you become a man, the aggressive inflections of fat basement dwelling lonely pigs on the chans is socio-psychotic behavior that you shd not seek to follow unless planning a serial killer spree.
Not very charitable, are you? I see a lot of projection in your imaginary depiction of me, mr simp.
You're the one talking about natural mechanisms and then you act as if I'm a crazy incel for pointing out there is order in nature? That's cognitive dissonance.
Here are some words of wisdom (I hope St. Paul is mature enough for you):
Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. (Eph. 5:22-24)
Now go get pegged by your girlfriend/wife. See? Now that's charitable. I assume you're not a fag or an incel at least.
Soon TikTok is gone, then TG next and after that they will drive all remaining scoundrels to X and then with a single point of failure : Digi-ID , CBDC , Strong Auth all in the CIA-NSA-Globalist-X-App streamed to your 24/7 on mobile from CIALink global sat Network.
All the beautiful women will still look like emanciated zombies after they've been locked into WrongThink Re-education Camps for posting stuff like above on X.
Let's face it, we are cattle, the slaughter is coming closer and the cattle is not waking up nor resisting en mass.
Otherwise I agree, except I see the more "beautiful and successful " people going along and not resisting more frequently when compared to just normal average peoole.
I have found the beautiful-successful type to be hardest to convince as they have most to lose from their current position of relative success.
Just take care of yourself and your family.
Truth. Thank you. Take care
Unfortunately for them -- ayh chose a nomadic path and subsequently ayh have nothing to lose and every thing to gain by seeking revenge.
A honorable death.
A necessary evil ;)
Keep larping subverter
Sadly, you are likely correct. I've thought of this avenue before and the only hiccup i see is that when titays are involved, male brains shut off completely, so i'm not sure how much info would break through the mammary boundary.
TBF this is not unusual nor necessarily wrong -- humans are overcomplicated in perception in the modern era. We are over extended on what is to be human. Civilization is about who is in charge not what we do.
With this knowledge, much like Zion Don and Elon are exploiting to master the nationalist demo by mean tweeting, to lead our people to salvation from oligarch empires is by exploiting these mechanisms.
SEX (Latin seco; to divide) implies a setting apart from one another, hence male/female distinction. Selling (suggestion) tempts buying (consent) aka bringing together many consumers under few merchants.
Refocusing away from the distracting cleavage, would allow one to discern that white top/black bottom implies a division (de) of light into pure light (white) and absence of light (black), hence a distraction from the visible spectrum of light, which doesn't allow those within to see either side.
If many consent to a suggested game by few; then each one ignores to be different from one another, while seeking to win the same game.
Aka word for word...a suggested inversion of perceivable "sound for word". Only within sound can one shape words.
Nature implies all...the distinction of male/female within nature implies each different ONE within same ALL. Others suggest the aggregation of differences (men) under the same umbrella (all).
Attraction draws; resistance pushes...
That's stupid. Men don't listen to what attractive women say - they just stare at them and enjoy the view while nodding. Men listen to what other smart and wise men say.
Maybe thirsty simps listen intently and worship these women because they hope it will give them a chance.
Nature has mechanisms. We prescribe to these. What you fail to understand in this context is that it is not about hearing her but competing to be recognized by her by agreeing. Competition breeds intellect.
That's called simping and it's pathetic regardless of the message the woman has. Also, women don't like men who agree with them, where do you get this stuff - gender study textbooks? Man is the leader and the woman submits, that's the natural order encoded in humans. Everything else is feminist subversion of our nature.
You're a loser IRL huh? Sad
Did I struck a nerve? Simp cope.
I just see some really weird shit coming out of peoples minds. Very different from reddit but definitely a similar vein of lunacy.
How old are you? Piece of advice for when you become a man, the aggressive inflections of fat basement dwelling lonely pigs on the chans is socio-psychotic behavior that you shd not seek to follow unless planning a serial killer spree.
Go on a date. Get laid. Grow up.
Not very charitable, are you? I see a lot of projection in your imaginary depiction of me, mr simp.
You're the one talking about natural mechanisms and then you act as if I'm a crazy incel for pointing out there is order in nature? That's cognitive dissonance.
Here are some words of wisdom (I hope St. Paul is mature enough for you):
Now go get pegged by your girlfriend/wife. See? Now that's charitable. I assume you're not a fag or an incel at least.