I just watched the documentary. Of all the amazing things Jackson did (like defunding the central bank and paying off the debt) we're constantly reminded he owned slaves and was "a racist".
Normies on history: "Slavery was so bad and people were savage bigots back then!"
Them again: "Govern me harder daddy! The Fed and IRS is fine, monopoly money printing, inflation and debt is how economic growth happens. Racism doesn't count when it's against whites. I love being a slave to transnational mega corporations and jewish banking dynasties!"
I hate this soy patronizing smugness of modern day progressive mediocrity especially when dealing with legends of that caliber.
Personally, I like Calvin Coolidge better. He was known as "Silent Cal". At a dinner party, an attractive young woman once made a bet in his hearing with another person that she could get him to say more than two words. He said "you lose."
Ahhh! Fourth hand historical cringe! He had so many other choices! "Let's fuck!" "Suck it!" "Shit Horse!" "Fuck Shit!" "Taco Slut!" "Vermilion Shaft!" "Loblolly Blatherskite!"
He went hard against the banking cartel and the failed US central bank of the time. They tried to assassinate him for it. I don't know much else about him but based on that he seems legit.
VANE/WANE/WANT...which is based on need and wielded by ones free will of choice.
industry
Notice that industrious (steady attention to business) opposes sloth and idleness, while those who embrace the Hollywood industry are falling for sloth and idleness.
HollyWeirdos have so many mental problems
Which mind has more problems...the one making the wall flicker; or the one sitting in darkness while watching the flickering wall?
Consider CINE-ma aka cineration (reducing of any thing to ashes by combustion) and of course MA-CINE (mason)...
If ALL could be OF, then that would imply more than ALL, adjective (Shemitic from calah, to be ended or completed to perfect).
Adding to all implies blaspheming.
all of them
The whole number of particulars implies each ONE of them within ONENESS of all. Others tempt one to ignore self for a suggested aggregate called "all".
In this example...there's more than "all" the jews of Hollywood within ALL of existence.
yep
Yep implies vs nope...a conflict of reason aka a controlled enviro-ment by a suggesting jew within the mind of a consenting gentile.
It's a whole industry based on vanity, no wonder those HollyWeirdos have so many mental problems.
Andrew Jackson was based though.
My favorite and by far the most terrifying president
He's got some sick quotes, I feel the same way as this one.
"I was born for a storm, and a calm does not suit me." Andrew Jackson
I just watched the documentary. Of all the amazing things Jackson did (like defunding the central bank and paying off the debt) we're constantly reminded he owned slaves and was "a racist".
Normies on history: "Slavery was so bad and people were savage bigots back then!"
Them again: "Govern me harder daddy! The Fed and IRS is fine, monopoly money printing, inflation and debt is how economic growth happens. Racism doesn't count when it's against whites. I love being a slave to transnational mega corporations and jewish banking dynasties!"
I hate this soy patronizing smugness of modern day progressive mediocrity especially when dealing with legends of that caliber.
They cast historical figures like Jackson in a bad light using dishonest morality as justification.
What a badass. Imagine if the US had a president like that today. Imagine if any country had a leader like that. We're cucked beyond words.
It's not over till the fat lady sings
Personally, I like Calvin Coolidge better. He was known as "Silent Cal". At a dinner party, an attractive young woman once made a bet in his hearing with another person that she could get him to say more than two words. He said "you lose."
Ahhh! Fourth hand historical cringe! He had so many other choices! "Let's fuck!" "Suck it!" "Shit Horse!" "Fuck Shit!" "Taco Slut!" "Vermilion Shaft!" "Loblolly Blatherskite!"
He went hard against the banking cartel and the failed US central bank of the time. They tried to assassinate him for it. I don't know much else about him but based on that he seems legit.
VANE/WANE/WANT...which is based on need and wielded by ones free will of choice.
Notice that industrious (steady attention to business) opposes sloth and idleness, while those who embrace the Hollywood industry are falling for sloth and idleness.
Which mind has more problems...the one making the wall flicker; or the one sitting in darkness while watching the flickering wall?
Consider CINE-ma aka cineration (reducing of any thing to ashes by combustion) and of course MA-CINE (mason)...
If ALL could be OF, then that would imply more than ALL, adjective (Shemitic from calah, to be ended or completed to perfect).
Adding to all implies blaspheming.
The whole number of particulars implies each ONE of them within ONENESS of all. Others tempt one to ignore self for a suggested aggregate called "all".
In this example...there's more than "all" the jews of Hollywood within ALL of existence.
Yep implies vs nope...a conflict of reason aka a controlled enviro-ment by a suggesting jew within the mind of a consenting gentile.