This speaks to the fact that any talking point can be used for any agenda. So, the factions are all fubar right now, because nobody actually knows what they are supporting.
It's all like one gigantic slow motion train wreck.
Because the 'journalist' in the mask is open about pushing an agenda via fake news. Even when that news organization fires him. He still hold the agenda above truth, and has no idea what a journalist is.
Look. There are only so many levels of sarcasm you can use, before your statement looses all value. That number is actually one. Where I am reading 2 or 3 levels into your text???
Do us all a favor. Say what you actually mean, or don't bother saying anything at all.
I did not intend my reply to be sarcastic. I was stating for clarity that the Fake News tag was not to imply that the video clip itself was faked. You explained that the tag was to indicate the masked man was an example of a fake journalist.
EDIT: My meaning would have been clearer with a question mark, but I was certain enough that you answering my question would have been a waste of your time.
So to be clear, there is no evidence of this being a staged encounter [?] Thanks.
Well the leftist commies are the only fucking ones speaking up publicly against Israel.
This speaks to the fact that any talking point can be used for any agenda. So, the factions are all fubar right now, because nobody actually knows what they are supporting.
It's all like one gigantic slow motion train wreck.
Why was this given the Fake News tag?
Because the 'journalist' in the mask is open about pushing an agenda via fake news. Even when that news organization fires him. He still hold the agenda above truth, and has no idea what a journalist is.
So to be clear, there is no evidence of this being a staged encounter. Thanks.
Look. There are only so many levels of sarcasm you can use, before your statement looses all value. That number is actually one. Where I am reading 2 or 3 levels into your text???
Do us all a favor. Say what you actually mean, or don't bother saying anything at all.
I did not intend my reply to be sarcastic. I was stating for clarity that the Fake News tag was not to imply that the video clip itself was faked. You explained that the tag was to indicate the masked man was an example of a fake journalist.
EDIT: My meaning would have been clearer with a question mark, but I was certain enough that you answering my question would have been a waste of your time.
They succeeded a century ago. What’s your point?