Look. There are only so many levels of sarcasm you can use, before your statement looses all value. That number is actually one. Where I am reading 2 or 3 levels into your text???
Do us all a favor. Say what you actually mean, or don't bother saying anything at all.
I did not intend my reply to be sarcastic. I was stating for clarity that the Fake News tag was not to imply that the video clip itself was faked. You explained that the tag was to indicate the masked man was an example of a fake journalist.
EDIT: My meaning would have been clearer with a question mark, but I was certain enough that you answering my question would have been a waste of your time.
So to be clear, there is no evidence of this being a staged encounter [?] Thanks.
So to be clear, there is no evidence of this being a staged encounter. Thanks.
Look. There are only so many levels of sarcasm you can use, before your statement looses all value. That number is actually one. Where I am reading 2 or 3 levels into your text???
Do us all a favor. Say what you actually mean, or don't bother saying anything at all.
I did not intend my reply to be sarcastic. I was stating for clarity that the Fake News tag was not to imply that the video clip itself was faked. You explained that the tag was to indicate the masked man was an example of a fake journalist.
EDIT: My meaning would have been clearer with a question mark, but I was certain enough that you answering my question would have been a waste of your time.