Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
When a flat Earther tells you that water cannot curve (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 1 year ago by vpnsurfer 1 year ago by vpnsurfer +21 / -10
105 comments download share
105 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (105)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Have you done research into shapes other than flat earth?

It is best to simply research the earth's shape directly - whatever it may be, ideally without such preconceptions/beliefs/biases.

In terms of evaluating other peoples ideas / conclusions as to the shape of the world - yes. I have evaluated/researched spherical and concave notions, as well as those that think it is flat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ceva 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I mean there are many more options than spherical, concave, and flat, of course. Have you done research into a cuboid earth?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I mean there are many more options than spherical, concave, and flat, of course.

Of course. In many gross depictions of flat earth it is depicted as hemispherical, and i've even encountered someone who thinks it is shaped like a ziggurat (i think an inverted one).

Have you done research into a cuboid earth?

I've never encountered a vocal "cubist" outside the art world - have you? Again, due to the natural behavior of water and assuming the earth is 70%+ covered in it, if it were a cube, the world we know would be on the top face of it. Some think this is generally what masons mean by "on the square"

Again, if you seek to determine the shape of the world through research - it is necessary to eliminate such biases for objective study of any kind. You research the earth and its shape, not the "spherical earth" or the "cube earth" etc.

Of all the ones i encountered, the rectilineator was one of the more fascinating things i researched in regards to measuring and concluding that the earth is actually concave.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ceva 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I've never encountered a vocal "cubist" outside the art world - have you?

Nope, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't do research into it, if you are keeping an open mind about the possibilities of what the shape would be. It seems by your actions that you suspect the earth is flat, if you choose not to devote time to research other shapes.

You research the earth and its shape

Exactly!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Nope, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't do research into it

There is nothing to research if nothing about the "cube earth" exists to study...

if you are keeping an open mind about the possibilities of what the shape would be

As i said before, in order for the cube earth to be consistent with what we measure and observe - the known world would have to be on its topmost face. This is certainly not a possibility that we can or should completely rule out.

However, flatly transitioning from the spherical worldview merely juxtaposing/projecting the known world onto a cube would be nonsensical and against the laws of physics for the same reasons that the spherical earth is.

It seems by your actions that you suspect the earth is flat,

What actions? I have plainly told you that i work hard not to "suspect" anything (and excise such suspicions, aka beliefs), and to only deal with what i can know and thoroughly validate.

On a local level, the land and water are generally flat, but the earth is a LOT larger than that. Indeed, if we are wrong about the earth's shape - we could easily be quite wrong about its total size as well.

Exactly!

Exactly. That's why we don't research "the cube earth", or "the spherical earth", or "the flat earth". We just study "the earth" and its shape without such biases (ideally).

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy