Considering he may be one of them, one of the purposes behind this might be to widen Overton Window.
It goes like this: The digital panopticon and social credit score is already a done deal. It is already in the plans. What they need to do now is to somehow sell it to the general public.
Enter Overton Window. A way to coerce people into accepting something they would never thought of to accept otherwise.
It goes something like this and consists of several phases:
First that something is simply unthinkable. People go about their lives without even thinking about it. (In our case that would be total suveillance and social credit score.)
Then the concept is being entered into public consciousness as remotely possible, but still generally unthinkable.
Next step is making it technically possible, but still widely unacceptable.
Next comes the debatable phase. It is still unacceptable, but somehow becomes debatable. Various public debates are initiated. Pros and cons are being weighted. <--- This is where we are at now and quite possibly the very purpose of Peterson's speech was to move public perception from unacceptable to debatable phase.
Following phases are as follows:
Generally acceptable.
Encouraged and favourable.
Mandatory.
In any case, it's just a thought. I don't know if I'm correct or not. Quite possibly Peterson genuinely wants to warn people... But if I'm onto something, then other terms to look up would be Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis and Hegelian Dialectic. Or, to simplify a bit, the same old Good Cop - Bad Cop thing we've all seen in the movies.
Also, the fact that it is being published by Forbes - of all fucking places - does not help. Not in the least.
lol yeah all the money and power would be useless without his type
omg you are tilted at this guy
psychology 101: that which you don't like outside yourself is that which you don't like inside yourself
instead of being all emo about one guy who does videos on youtube and a few other things focus on the actual real problems omg
you do realize that the prime ministers and presidents and their corrupt politician paid off people are FAR worse people than this guy could ever be right?
and you realize that the politician's bosses are FAR FAR worse people than they are? sheesh wtf
It's not really about separating information from the source... It's more about intent and purpose. What he tells here is true. Sure. We all know that. Why do you assume those politians do not know that? They do.
It's not about knowing as such. It's about intent and what comes next... and next, I imagine, there's a lenghty debate divided along political lines during which large part of society will become totally in favour of social credit score, while the rest will know no better than to simply follow the herd. And thus, step by step, those things are being done... I wouldn't be too surprised if all the contracts are already sealed and the necessary software is already being in development if not fully developed already.
We have the same goals. Of course social credit score is an abomination and of course it should be stopped. It's just that some see in Peterson fake/controlled opposition while others assume he is genuine... I do not know which is it, but my first thought was of Overton Window, so here you go...
You are painting a picture of your mind as the spiderman meme all pointing at each other. Why would you listen to what other people who you've never met decide whether or not someone is worth listening to? That's some herd mentality shit and I can tell you there's cows in the slaughterhouse who believe until their dying breath the line they are in is going to Disney Land not the butcher block.
No I've known about the monolithic surveillance state for quite awhile at least since NSA project Echelon But I do sometimes wonder if people understand what they're goose-stepping into with the reliance of social media as faux social stimulation
I can't comment on this video you linked because I didn't watch it. In fact I hate Peterstein so much that I CANNOT watch it.
You have to understand how psy-ops and propaganda works. These guys aren't stupid. They know some of the audience have brains. Peterstein caters for that segment.
Poison in the honey is the term for his case. They will say 95% good things but misdirect in the 5%. His kind is far more dangerous than Alex Jones and CNN because he attracts you with words that seem genuine.
If you haven't already, read the protocols of the elders of zion. One protocol talks about setting up false opposition that speaks as if it were real opposition but is under their control. You would be surprised how many are false opposition.
I swear some of you on here are simple as fuck. What he's talking about is true he's talking about where the current surveillance state is headed the fact some of you cannot separate the source from the information shows me you have the intellectual ability of stupid children.
WHy would you listen to a known liar, who has sold his sold to the darkest entities?
How do you discern when he is lying, when he is half-truthing, when he is doing a diversion, when he is doing a limited hangout and when he is telling the truth if ever?
If somebody is a known multiple repeat known scumbag liar, it is just so much easier to ignore him and go to less tainted sources that at least AIM for the truth, even if they err occasionally. But they are not knowingly lying like Scumbag Peterson is doing.
It just saves time. Be a pragmatist, not a defender of liars.
People are not as simple as the reductionist view through which you view them completely devoid of nuance. Do you understand that by discounting what he is saying you are inadvertently defending the current surveillance state we all inhabit? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Of course not. You are applying binary logic , whereas I have long since moved beyond that, because I didn't find it practically useful for myself anymore. I suggest you consider, or at least try the same.
There are many more options than +Peterson and -Peterson. I'm in the "Beyond Peterson" option.
I just find it funny that he is revered still, after having been exposed as the double-talking limited hangout who he is.
But if you get useful stuff out of Peterson, by all means do. I don't.
"I'm beyond Jordan Peterson".
Wow that's incredible, please show me YOUR work. Show me what YOU have done to wake up and educate humanity better than Jordan Peterson. A website, video, a book, a podcast...
Nothing? Crickets? Nothing to show for yourself? Then shut the fuck up troll.
He won't. There's a number of members here that are posting hate or constant complaints and problems without any solutions. They post up something decent here and there and then post 50 divisive things. The hallmarks of infiltration are becoming hard to ignore. I could be wrong but it's really becoming hard to ignore.
Considering he may be one of them, one of the purposes behind this might be to widen Overton Window.
It goes like this: The digital panopticon and social credit score is already a done deal. It is already in the plans. What they need to do now is to somehow sell it to the general public.
Enter Overton Window. A way to coerce people into accepting something they would never thought of to accept otherwise.
It goes something like this and consists of several phases:
First that something is simply unthinkable. People go about their lives without even thinking about it. (In our case that would be total suveillance and social credit score.)
Then the concept is being entered into public consciousness as remotely possible, but still generally unthinkable.
Next step is making it technically possible, but still widely unacceptable.
Next comes the debatable phase. It is still unacceptable, but somehow becomes debatable. Various public debates are initiated. Pros and cons are being weighted. <--- This is where we are at now and quite possibly the very purpose of Peterson's speech was to move public perception from unacceptable to debatable phase.
Following phases are as follows:
Generally acceptable.
Encouraged and favourable.
Mandatory.
In any case, it's just a thought. I don't know if I'm correct or not. Quite possibly Peterson genuinely wants to warn people... But if I'm onto something, then other terms to look up would be Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis and Hegelian Dialectic. Or, to simplify a bit, the same old Good Cop - Bad Cop thing we've all seen in the movies.
Also, the fact that it is being published by Forbes - of all fucking places - does not help. Not in the least.
Peterstein is our very worst enemy. He is one of them. He is told what to say: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OSWWZ8ntpuEM/
Very worst lol
Pretty sure the corrupt old money families and their dark arts priests are far worse a problem than this guy
They wouldn't be able to do anything without his traitor type. A wolf in a sheep's clothing is far more dangerous than a wolf.
lol yeah all the money and power would be useless without his type
omg you are tilted at this guy
psychology 101: that which you don't like outside yourself is that which you don't like inside yourself
instead of being all emo about one guy who does videos on youtube and a few other things focus on the actual real problems omg
you do realize that the prime ministers and presidents and their corrupt politician paid off people are FAR worse people than this guy could ever be right?
and you realize that the politician's bosses are FAR FAR worse people than they are? sheesh wtf
The inability to separate information from the source seems to be a serious hang-up for pseudo intellectuals
It's not really about separating information from the source... It's more about intent and purpose. What he tells here is true. Sure. We all know that. Why do you assume those politians do not know that? They do.
It's not about knowing as such. It's about intent and what comes next... and next, I imagine, there's a lenghty debate divided along political lines during which large part of society will become totally in favour of social credit score, while the rest will know no better than to simply follow the herd. And thus, step by step, those things are being done... I wouldn't be too surprised if all the contracts are already sealed and the necessary software is already being in development if not fully developed already.
We have the same goals. Of course social credit score is an abomination and of course it should be stopped. It's just that some see in Peterson fake/controlled opposition while others assume he is genuine... I do not know which is it, but my first thought was of Overton Window, so here you go...
You are painting a picture of your mind as the spiderman meme all pointing at each other. Why would you listen to what other people who you've never met decide whether or not someone is worth listening to? That's some herd mentality shit and I can tell you there's cows in the slaughterhouse who believe until their dying breath the line they are in is going to Disney Land not the butcher block.
Considering discerning the truth has been under attack from the brainwashing psy op for well over a century, this isn't a surprise right?
No I've known about the monolithic surveillance state for quite awhile at least since NSA project Echelon But I do sometimes wonder if people understand what they're goose-stepping into with the reliance of social media as faux social stimulation
Peterstein is one of them. He pushed for the vaccine and he shills for Netanyahu.
Do you think that means what he's saying is untrustworthy?
I can't comment on this video you linked because I didn't watch it. In fact I hate Peterstein so much that I CANNOT watch it.
You have to understand how psy-ops and propaganda works. These guys aren't stupid. They know some of the audience have brains. Peterstein caters for that segment.
Poison in the honey is the term for his case. They will say 95% good things but misdirect in the 5%. His kind is far more dangerous than Alex Jones and CNN because he attracts you with words that seem genuine.
If you haven't already, read the protocols of the elders of zion. One protocol talks about setting up false opposition that speaks as if it were real opposition but is under their control. You would be surprised how many are false opposition.
If you have time and want to entertain yourself you can listen to this guy about Peterstein: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OSWWZ8ntpuEM/
C'mon the guys got a doctorate in a pseudo science he might be more complex than the average Joe but he's no fuckin Franz Kafka
He's like most people in his position...says some truths...leaves out certain truths....
No point hating any of them - they're just like everyone else...brainwashed
If you believe anything Jordan "Greater Israel Satanyahoo dicksucker" Peterson tells, I've got another limited hangout I can sell you.
I swear some of you on here are simple as fuck. What he's talking about is true he's talking about where the current surveillance state is headed the fact some of you cannot separate the source from the information shows me you have the intellectual ability of stupid children.
WHy would you listen to a known liar, who has sold his sold to the darkest entities?
How do you discern when he is lying, when he is half-truthing, when he is doing a diversion, when he is doing a limited hangout and when he is telling the truth if ever?
If somebody is a known multiple repeat known scumbag liar, it is just so much easier to ignore him and go to less tainted sources that at least AIM for the truth, even if they err occasionally. But they are not knowingly lying like Scumbag Peterson is doing.
It just saves time. Be a pragmatist, not a defender of liars.
People are not as simple as the reductionist view through which you view them completely devoid of nuance. Do you understand that by discounting what he is saying you are inadvertently defending the current surveillance state we all inhabit? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Of course not. You are applying binary logic , whereas I have long since moved beyond that, because I didn't find it practically useful for myself anymore. I suggest you consider, or at least try the same.
There are many more options than +Peterson and -Peterson. I'm in the "Beyond Peterson" option.
I just find it funny that he is revered still, after having been exposed as the double-talking limited hangout who he is.
But if you get useful stuff out of Peterson, by all means do. I don't.
Empty your cup
"I'm beyond Jordan Peterson". Wow that's incredible, please show me YOUR work. Show me what YOU have done to wake up and educate humanity better than Jordan Peterson. A website, video, a book, a podcast...
Nothing? Crickets? Nothing to show for yourself? Then shut the fuck up troll.
He won't. There's a number of members here that are posting hate or constant complaints and problems without any solutions. They post up something decent here and there and then post 50 divisive things. The hallmarks of infiltration are becoming hard to ignore. I could be wrong but it's really becoming hard to ignore.
Stinks of division. Stinks of shilling.