WHy would you listen to a known liar, who has sold his sold to the darkest entities?
How do you discern when he is lying, when he is half-truthing, when he is doing a diversion, when he is doing a limited hangout and when he is telling the truth if ever?
If somebody is a known multiple repeat known scumbag liar, it is just so much easier to ignore him and go to less tainted sources that at least AIM for the truth, even if they err occasionally. But they are not knowingly lying like Scumbag Peterson is doing.
It just saves time. Be a pragmatist, not a defender of liars.
People are not as simple as the reductionist view through which you view them completely devoid of nuance. Do you understand that by discounting what he is saying you are inadvertently defending the current surveillance state we all inhabit? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Of course not. You are applying binary logic , whereas I have long since moved beyond that, because I didn't find it practically useful for myself anymore. I suggest you consider, or at least try the same.
There are many more options than +Peterson and -Peterson. I'm in the "Beyond Peterson" option.
I just find it funny that he is revered still, after having been exposed as the double-talking limited hangout who he is.
But if you get useful stuff out of Peterson, by all means do. I don't.
"I'm beyond Jordan Peterson".
Wow that's incredible, please show me YOUR work. Show me what YOU have done to wake up and educate humanity better than Jordan Peterson. A website, video, a book, a podcast...
Nothing? Crickets? Nothing to show for yourself? Then shut the fuck up troll.
He won't. There's a number of members here that are posting hate or constant complaints and problems without any solutions. They post up something decent here and there and then post 50 divisive things. The hallmarks of infiltration are becoming hard to ignore. I could be wrong but it's really becoming hard to ignore.
WHy would you listen to a known liar, who has sold his sold to the darkest entities?
How do you discern when he is lying, when he is half-truthing, when he is doing a diversion, when he is doing a limited hangout and when he is telling the truth if ever?
If somebody is a known multiple repeat known scumbag liar, it is just so much easier to ignore him and go to less tainted sources that at least AIM for the truth, even if they err occasionally. But they are not knowingly lying like Scumbag Peterson is doing.
It just saves time. Be a pragmatist, not a defender of liars.
People are not as simple as the reductionist view through which you view them completely devoid of nuance. Do you understand that by discounting what he is saying you are inadvertently defending the current surveillance state we all inhabit? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Of course not. You are applying binary logic , whereas I have long since moved beyond that, because I didn't find it practically useful for myself anymore. I suggest you consider, or at least try the same.
There are many more options than +Peterson and -Peterson. I'm in the "Beyond Peterson" option.
I just find it funny that he is revered still, after having been exposed as the double-talking limited hangout who he is.
But if you get useful stuff out of Peterson, by all means do. I don't.
Empty your cup
"I'm beyond Jordan Peterson". Wow that's incredible, please show me YOUR work. Show me what YOU have done to wake up and educate humanity better than Jordan Peterson. A website, video, a book, a podcast...
Nothing? Crickets? Nothing to show for yourself? Then shut the fuck up troll.
He won't. There's a number of members here that are posting hate or constant complaints and problems without any solutions. They post up something decent here and there and then post 50 divisive things. The hallmarks of infiltration are becoming hard to ignore. I could be wrong but it's really becoming hard to ignore.
Stinks of division. Stinks of shilling.