I swear some of you on here are simple as fuck. What he's talking about is true he's talking about where the current surveillance state is headed the fact some of you cannot separate the source from the information shows me you have the intellectual ability of stupid children.
WHy would you listen to a known liar, who has sold his sold to the darkest entities?
How do you discern when he is lying, when he is half-truthing, when he is doing a diversion, when he is doing a limited hangout and when he is telling the truth if ever?
If somebody is a known multiple repeat known scumbag liar, it is just so much easier to ignore him and go to less tainted sources that at least AIM for the truth, even if they err occasionally. But they are not knowingly lying like Scumbag Peterson is doing.
It just saves time. Be a pragmatist, not a defender of liars.
People are not as simple as the reductionist view through which you view them completely devoid of nuance. Do you understand that by discounting what he is saying you are inadvertently defending the current surveillance state we all inhabit? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Of course not. You are applying binary logic , whereas I have long since moved beyond that, because I didn't find it practically useful for myself anymore. I suggest you consider, or at least try the same.
There are many more options than +Peterson and -Peterson. I'm in the "Beyond Peterson" option.
I just find it funny that he is revered still, after having been exposed as the double-talking limited hangout who he is.
But if you get useful stuff out of Peterson, by all means do. I don't.
If you believe anything Jordan "Greater Israel Satanyahoo dicksucker" Peterson tells, I've got another limited hangout I can sell you.
I swear some of you on here are simple as fuck. What he's talking about is true he's talking about where the current surveillance state is headed the fact some of you cannot separate the source from the information shows me you have the intellectual ability of stupid children.
WHy would you listen to a known liar, who has sold his sold to the darkest entities?
How do you discern when he is lying, when he is half-truthing, when he is doing a diversion, when he is doing a limited hangout and when he is telling the truth if ever?
If somebody is a known multiple repeat known scumbag liar, it is just so much easier to ignore him and go to less tainted sources that at least AIM for the truth, even if they err occasionally. But they are not knowingly lying like Scumbag Peterson is doing.
It just saves time. Be a pragmatist, not a defender of liars.
People are not as simple as the reductionist view through which you view them completely devoid of nuance. Do you understand that by discounting what he is saying you are inadvertently defending the current surveillance state we all inhabit? The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Of course not. You are applying binary logic , whereas I have long since moved beyond that, because I didn't find it practically useful for myself anymore. I suggest you consider, or at least try the same.
There are many more options than +Peterson and -Peterson. I'm in the "Beyond Peterson" option.
I just find it funny that he is revered still, after having been exposed as the double-talking limited hangout who he is.
But if you get useful stuff out of Peterson, by all means do. I don't.