In the history of our nation, the dividing into clans or clades it tribes was always the precursor for civil war or genocide. Read the Book of Mormon. It happened here six or seven times, including our War of the States.
This is decent material, but the lowest hanging fruit is 1) White people looking out for white people like every other group does, and a distant but important #2) Christianity.
Both CLAN (body of persons closely united by some common interest or pursuit) and CLADE (group of organisms evolved from a common ancestor) invert nature (setting apart) with artifice (putting together).
The mind of many is set to follow few. The reverting (revisionism) already took place. Natural directs; artificial turns...if one consents to ignore former for latter.
Holistic genetic interest is a feminine concern
a) Holistic (whole) implies generation aka motion (male) to momentum (fe-male) and to matter (trans-form).
b) Concern aka CON (together; with) CERN (to perceive) implies ones ignorance of perception (apart) for suggestion (together). Taking the con out; allows one to dis-cern self.
jewish insularity is masculine
Motion (masculine) to momentum (feminine) for insulated off-spring by trans-formation of matter. Life (form) implies insulated in-between inception and death (flow).
a) Illumination doesn't obfuscate. Light implies motion; it's the shade of matter which obfuscates those who ignore light.
b) Meaning implies something affixed (suggested information)...being implies within everything moving (perceivable inspiration). Ones consent to hold onto suggested information permits others to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will.
c) Schizophrenia aka Eugene Bleuler and Sigismund Freud conspiring to conquer psychiatry, and underneath that...schizo/schism (divide), which is what ones consent to any suggest -ism establishes within self and against others.
d) Why is it that I can imply from what is written; while you reason over who's writing it?
Let's take another example from your quotes: "war of the sexes"...SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...can a division (male/female) exist without conflict/war/reason?
If male and female are divided from each other; then why does FE(minine)MALE imply being within each other?
e) Account implies "a registry of a debt or credit". If I didn't make an offer...
About free-will-of-choice: Post Score (0) Comment Score (11418)
...then where did I gave creed/credit or took on debt upon self?
f) DELIBERATE, verb "to balance in the mind" tempts one to ignore that only nature (motion) generates balance (momentum) for ones choice (matter) within.
Others suggest reason (conflict aka imbalance) as balance in the mind to trick ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
tl; dr...can one just be within without others trying to label being from outside?
If one views others as crazy or boring; then one ignores balanced natural order exciting one to adapt.
In other words...passing judgement (you're crazy or boring) upon others tempts one to ignore being within justice aka that which JUST (balance) IS (essence).
I use "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore their free will of choice...and yet they keep trying to idolize the one using choice; instead of ones choice made.
How could free will of choice ever be crazy or boring...unless one chooses it to be?
In the history of our nation, the dividing into clans or clades it tribes was always the precursor for civil war or genocide. Read the Book of Mormon. It happened here six or seven times, including our War of the States.
This is decent material, but the lowest hanging fruit is 1) White people looking out for white people like every other group does, and a distant but important #2) Christianity.
Both CLAN (body of persons closely united by some common interest or pursuit) and CLADE (group of organisms evolved from a common ancestor) invert nature (setting apart) with artifice (putting together).
The mind of many is set to follow few. The reverting (revisionism) already took place. Natural directs; artificial turns...if one consents to ignore former for latter.
a) Holistic (whole) implies generation aka motion (male) to momentum (fe-male) and to matter (trans-form).
b) Concern aka CON (together; with) CERN (to perceive) implies ones ignorance of perception (apart) for suggestion (together). Taking the con out; allows one to dis-cern self.
Motion (masculine) to momentum (feminine) for insulated off-spring by trans-formation of matter. Life (form) implies insulated in-between inception and death (flow).
a) Illumination doesn't obfuscate. Light implies motion; it's the shade of matter which obfuscates those who ignore light.
b) Meaning implies something affixed (suggested information)...being implies within everything moving (perceivable inspiration). Ones consent to hold onto suggested information permits others to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will.
c) Schizophrenia aka Eugene Bleuler and Sigismund Freud conspiring to conquer psychiatry, and underneath that...schizo/schism (divide), which is what ones consent to any suggest -ism establishes within self and against others.
d) Why is it that I can imply from what is written; while you reason over who's writing it?
Let's take another example from your quotes: "war of the sexes"...SEX (Latin seco; to divide)...can a division (male/female) exist without conflict/war/reason?
If male and female are divided from each other; then why does FE(minine)MALE imply being within each other?
e) Account implies "a registry of a debt or credit". If I didn't make an offer...
...then where did I gave creed/credit or took on debt upon self?
f) DELIBERATE, verb "to balance in the mind" tempts one to ignore that only nature (motion) generates balance (momentum) for ones choice (matter) within.
Others suggest reason (conflict aka imbalance) as balance in the mind to trick ones consenting choice to imbalance itself.
tl; dr...can one just be within without others trying to label being from outside?
If one views others as crazy or boring; then one ignores balanced natural order exciting one to adapt.
In other words...passing judgement (you're crazy or boring) upon others tempts one to ignore being within justice aka that which JUST (balance) IS (essence).
I use "free-will-of-choice" to make it harder for others to ignore their free will of choice...and yet they keep trying to idolize the one using choice; instead of ones choice made.
How could free will of choice ever be crazy or boring...unless one chooses it to be?