The UK speech laws are those enacted via the EU as the final arbitration as ruled on by the ECHR (Europen Court of Human Rights) to which Sam can appeal:
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
EU also enacted hate speech laws that trump those. Do you really believe the EU technocrats who are behind the immigration mess to begin with, want people to have free speech and the right to criticize their policies?
I'm not arguing UK speech laws I've stated he served as a canary in the "coalmine of free speech" in Britain which he has. With his conviction and arrest he's shown the UK has no such thing as free speech. The thing these gubments don't understand is when they convict someone on something as frivolous as words they've lost the plot and are clearly technodystopian. If that guy was an immigrant do you think this would be a headline at all?
That kids got more balls then anyone you know in the trailer park. He's a canary in the coalmine of free speech in the UK.
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."
Evelyn Beatrice Hall
The UK speech laws are those enacted via the EU as the final arbitration as ruled on by the ECHR (Europen Court of Human Rights) to which Sam can appeal:
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.
The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
EU also enacted hate speech laws that trump those. Do you really believe the EU technocrats who are behind the immigration mess to begin with, want people to have free speech and the right to criticize their policies?
I'm not arguing UK speech laws I've stated he served as a canary in the "coalmine of free speech" in Britain which he has. With his conviction and arrest he's shown the UK has no such thing as free speech. The thing these gubments don't understand is when they convict someone on something as frivolous as words they've lost the plot and are clearly technodystopian. If that guy was an immigrant do you think this would be a headline at all?
what do you mean by that? do you think they have unlimited free speech laws in the UK?
It's pretty self explanatory
Kek
To quote Samuel L. Jackson played as Jules in Pulp Fiction "ENGLISH MOTHERFUCKER DO YOU SPEAK IT!"