I'm not arguing UK speech laws I've stated he served as a canary in the "coalmine of free speech" in Britain which he has. With his conviction and arrest he's shown the UK has no such thing as free speech. The thing these gubments don't understand is when they convict someone on something as frivolous as words they've lost the plot and are clearly technodystopian. If that guy was an immigrant do you think this would be a headline at all?
I'm not arguing UK speech laws I've stated he served as a canary in the "coalmine of free speech" in Britain which he has. With his conviction and arrest he's shown the UK has no such thing as free speech. The thing these gubments don't understand is when they convict someone on something as frivolous as words they've lost the plot and are clearly technodystopian. If that guy was an immigrant do you think this would be a headline at all?