a) Point implies end of sentence; being implies life sentence. Others suggest points to distract from sentence, which implies progressivism aka tempting ones focus towards suggested outcome and away from perceivable origin.
Life isn't about outcome; but about adaptation to origin.
b) Being separated (critic) from others and attaching self with critic to others contradicts perceivable (set apart) with suggested (put together)...and the word "critic" is the spell-craft utilized to establish this contradiction within the minds of the consenting majority of mankind.
It's ones consent to the suggested word "critic" which tempts many ones together, while permitting a few chosen ones to rule through suggested rules of behavior aka laws of men aka rules for thee; but not for me etc.
c) Freemasonry implies initiation to hidden knowledge aka to initiate one another to perceivable (knowledge) underneath suggested (understanding).
The trick...the suggested layers of initiation by others to something "hidden" distracts one from "hiding" willingly from everything perceivable already revealed to each ones perception. It's ones consent to suggestion, which hides oneself from perceivable, while making it seem hidden. This hiding spot within self implies ignorance (Latin ignorantia; ignoro) - "not to know".
Let's bring this back to the "point"...focusing on a suggested point tempts one to ignore perceivable sentence, hence narrowing ones sight to a focus-point aka point of convergence aka Latin focus; foci - "a fire, the hearth".
Focusing by consent to a suggested point implies a burned offering by those suggesting it. Suggested implies a rite of passage (ritual) to those suggesting, and a self sacrifice to those consenting to take the rite.
tl;dr: Derivation (inception) + Sentence (life) + Point (death)...is this hard to comprehend or easy to ignore?
Your message is intriguing, but it could be more impactful with greater clarity and simplicity. Language is a form of spell-craft, and harnessing its magic in a cleaner, more concise manner can enhance the accessibility and potency of your ideas.
it could be more impactful with greater clarity and simplicity
a) SIM'PLE, adjective (Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold)...ones consent to anything suggested by another implies "doubling; folding", hence making a compact/complex.
In other words...one within all implies unfolding; ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a folding together aka a doubling of singular (one) into dualism (two).
In short...suggested information (complex) or perceivable inspiration (simple) implies ones free will of choice...not what any other one offers.
b) PACT, noun (Latin pactus, from pango) - "a contract; an agreement or covenant" implies ones consent (to buy) to another ones suggestion (to sell) aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
This pact of binding together tempts one to ignore being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable), hence being set as "free" will of choice.
Others seek "impact"...I describe how each of them is within a pact, while holding it together willingly.
Language is a form of spell-craft
a) Suggesting letters as words implies crafting spelling of others.
b) Ones consent to suggested words makes one the "letter" aka the one who LETS others define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of words.
c) Language implies articulation of sound aka tempting others with artifice (suggested words) to ignore natural (perceivable sound).
Adapting to sound implies Phonetician (from phonic; sound), while consenting to words implies Deaf Phonetician aka "def-inition"...that's applied spell-craft.
d) Nature doesn't shape words together; it sets itself (sound) apart (instruments). Instrument implies structured (stru) mind (ment) within (in).
Responding to sound implies resonance; while consenting to words implies dissonance aka division (dis) within sound (sona).
harnessing magic
Magic aka "secret operations of natural cause", which implies cause (whole) dividing itself (secret; seco; to divide) into partials.
Others suggest that secret implies "removed from sight", yet ones sight implies reaction (re) within action (move). Perceivable isn't hidden; ones consent to suggested hides self from it aka ignorance.
cleaner
CLEAN, adjective - "free from extraneous matter"....that's what being free will of choice implies; what whole setting itself apart implies; what being an off-spring implies; what motion (inception towards death) separating into matter (life) implies.
free-will-of-choice implies clean...it's ones choices that besmirch.
enhance the accessibility
a) Being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...only within diminution can there be enhancement.
b) Nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...an all access pass. Ones consent to the suggestions by another, narrows ones sight by focusing on it, hence willingly shaping ones open mind into a closed box for another.
your message
MES'SAGE, noun (Latin missus, mitto, to send)...only nature sends (action); those within resend (reaction).
If you can read what I write about; then that's on you permitting yourself to see what you hid from beforehand. I simply write about perceivable, while taking apart the suggestions by others, which are contradictions...words contradict sound, hence CONTRADICT, verb - "to oppose by words".
intriguing
INTRIGUE, noun (Latin intrico, intricor, to enwrap; tricor, to trifle, to show tricks) - "A plot or scheme of a complicated nature, intended to effect some purpose by secret artifices"
I simply take apart artifice (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration)...which allows me to draw endless inspiration from.
Israel.
They who must not be named
That would be black people, but someone told me they don't have any power, so they cannot be racist.
https://youtu.be/43mPKVJ9eYg?si=-k_KKhWyOkflPmiD
a) Rule (inception towards death) generates critics (life) aka only within straight (loss) can there be distinction (growth).
b) To critic one another implies seeking conformity from others; hence tempting others to ignore distinction.
c) Freemasonry utilizes square parallel to rule as to establish angles/angels/anglo/english...
A suggestion contradicting ones "free will of choice"...
Do you have a point with this?
a) Point implies end of sentence; being implies life sentence. Others suggest points to distract from sentence, which implies progressivism aka tempting ones focus towards suggested outcome and away from perceivable origin.
Life isn't about outcome; but about adaptation to origin.
b) Being separated (critic) from others and attaching self with critic to others contradicts perceivable (set apart) with suggested (put together)...and the word "critic" is the spell-craft utilized to establish this contradiction within the minds of the consenting majority of mankind.
It's ones consent to the suggested word "critic" which tempts many ones together, while permitting a few chosen ones to rule through suggested rules of behavior aka laws of men aka rules for thee; but not for me etc.
c) Freemasonry implies initiation to hidden knowledge aka to initiate one another to perceivable (knowledge) underneath suggested (understanding).
The trick...the suggested layers of initiation by others to something "hidden" distracts one from "hiding" willingly from everything perceivable already revealed to each ones perception. It's ones consent to suggestion, which hides oneself from perceivable, while making it seem hidden. This hiding spot within self implies ignorance (Latin ignorantia; ignoro) - "not to know".
Let's bring this back to the "point"...focusing on a suggested point tempts one to ignore perceivable sentence, hence narrowing ones sight to a focus-point aka point of convergence aka Latin focus; foci - "a fire, the hearth".
Focusing by consent to a suggested point implies a burned offering by those suggesting it. Suggested implies a rite of passage (ritual) to those suggesting, and a self sacrifice to those consenting to take the rite.
tl;dr: Derivation (inception) + Sentence (life) + Point (death)...is this hard to comprehend or easy to ignore?
Your message is intriguing, but it could be more impactful with greater clarity and simplicity. Language is a form of spell-craft, and harnessing its magic in a cleaner, more concise manner can enhance the accessibility and potency of your ideas.
a) SIM'PLE, adjective (Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold)...ones consent to anything suggested by another implies "doubling; folding", hence making a compact/complex.
In other words...one within all implies unfolding; ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a folding together aka a doubling of singular (one) into dualism (two).
In short...suggested information (complex) or perceivable inspiration (simple) implies ones free will of choice...not what any other one offers.
b) PACT, noun (Latin pactus, from pango) - "a contract; an agreement or covenant" implies ones consent (to buy) to another ones suggestion (to sell) aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
This pact of binding together tempts one to ignore being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable), hence being set as "free" will of choice.
Others seek "impact"...I describe how each of them is within a pact, while holding it together willingly.
a) Suggesting letters as words implies crafting spelling of others.
b) Ones consent to suggested words makes one the "letter" aka the one who LETS others define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of words.
c) Language implies articulation of sound aka tempting others with artifice (suggested words) to ignore natural (perceivable sound).
Adapting to sound implies Phonetician (from phonic; sound), while consenting to words implies Deaf Phonetician aka "def-inition"...that's applied spell-craft.
d) Nature doesn't shape words together; it sets itself (sound) apart (instruments). Instrument implies structured (stru) mind (ment) within (in).
Responding to sound implies resonance; while consenting to words implies dissonance aka division (dis) within sound (sona).
Magic aka "secret operations of natural cause", which implies cause (whole) dividing itself (secret; seco; to divide) into partials.
Others suggest that secret implies "removed from sight", yet ones sight implies reaction (re) within action (move). Perceivable isn't hidden; ones consent to suggested hides self from it aka ignorance.
CLEAN, adjective - "free from extraneous matter"....that's what being free will of choice implies; what whole setting itself apart implies; what being an off-spring implies; what motion (inception towards death) separating into matter (life) implies.
free-will-of-choice implies clean...it's ones choices that besmirch.
a) Being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...only within diminution can there be enhancement.
b) Nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...an all access pass. Ones consent to the suggestions by another, narrows ones sight by focusing on it, hence willingly shaping ones open mind into a closed box for another.
MES'SAGE, noun (Latin missus, mitto, to send)...only nature sends (action); those within resend (reaction).
If you can read what I write about; then that's on you permitting yourself to see what you hid from beforehand. I simply write about perceivable, while taking apart the suggestions by others, which are contradictions...words contradict sound, hence CONTRADICT, verb - "to oppose by words".
INTRIGUE, noun (Latin intrico, intricor, to enwrap; tricor, to trifle, to show tricks) - "A plot or scheme of a complicated nature, intended to effect some purpose by secret artifices"
I simply take apart artifice (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration)...which allows me to draw endless inspiration from.