I don't know how do people still believe in these fairytales, but there seems to be an idea about how the most faithful christ believers can escape the "tribulations" (Read:the upcoming NWO "Rape of man" where you just roll over and die) before they come if they are faithful enough.
Don't delude yourself.
The only people who survive the upcoming mass worldwide Dark Ages are the ones who know how to evade government and survive as the outside rest of the world goes to bloody hell.
It happened in Cambodia that everyone who survived got the fuck out of Cambodia years before the Khmer Rouge took power. It happened in Russia where if you didn't run years before the October Revolution you just die. Do not expect it will be different this time. If you are in ground zero at year zero, Jesus doesn't turn you into a holy paladin. You just die.
I dunno who spread this rapture thing, but whoever spreads it clearly wants the easy way out of the upcoming death and destruction that will engulf the world.
It takes more athiestic "faith" to NOT believe in God, as if the universe happened by accident, than to believe in a God who created it.
I agree with you wholeheartedly. The question is, why is the god of Israel credited with its creation?
That’s the contentious part. The god of the Bible is not God, he’s just the god of Israel, spiritual leader of the Jews
a) AC'CIDENT, noun [Latin accidens, falling) - "a coming or falling; an event that takes place without one's foresight or expectation"...coming to be aka inception implies without ones expectation.
Also; only while falling (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
b) CREATE, verb - "to produce; to bring into being from nothing; to cause to exist". Others suggest creationism (out of nothing) as the inversion of transmutation (within everything).
Nothing aka suggested nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to consent to de-nial everything perceivable for suggested nothingness.
c) One cannot believe in "God" without first consenting to those who shape suggestions in the name of (in nomine) padre et fili et spiritu sancti.
Whatever one believes is secondary to those suggesting one what to believe, which those suggesting rub into ones eyes with the first commandment aka Exodus 20:3 - "You shall have no other gods before me".
The trick...suggestion by others (words) is secondary to perception as self (sound).
Where did you got the word "God" from? Who suggested you to use words?
God
a) First implies all perceivable; second implies ones perception; third implies suggestions by another. Without perception a suggestion couldn't be made; and without perceivable ones perception would have no input.
If you say God equals perceivable; then ones perception needs to adapt to perceivable "God"...not to suggested "God". The difference...suggested is put together; perceivable is being set apart.
b) The suggestion of God as creator contradicts God as all; whole; omnipotence; everything; sole; one and only; origin; cause etc.
Creationism implies adding to; which implies God lacking...
Nihilism