https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOZjMZC5/x/c/4Z8jPtFohx2 :
CrazyRussian 0 points 13 minutes ago +1 / -1
Since when "a link" become a proof of anything?
Do you understand that anybody could make a page with absolutely any bullshit?
Well, is it kind of some mental illness, when somebody account a link to some web >page as a proof?
–CrazyRussian 0 points 5 days ago +1 / -1
Still waiting for any proof from you...
You still didn't tell me proof of what exactly you are waiting. :)
I'll wait.
That's the only thing you could ever do with such attitude. :)
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOZjMZC5/x/c/4Z8j6NemZ6H
CrazyRussian 0 point 1 minutes ago +1 / -1
Your brain could not function without external links?
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOZjMZC5/x/c/4Z8jPtFpWdC
Logic 100. :D
CrazyRussian 0 point 16 minutes ago +1 / -1
More interesting question is why you demand some fucking link to get a proof that magnet does not stick to copper of graphene? Yet another rabbit hole here? :)
Because facts.
sourcing is weird. Its a good concept but just doesn't really mean anything nowadays. what someone considers a truth, or valid source is unfortunately tied to either there political view or religious ideology. Like right now, i could source you scientific papers describing AIDS transmission, and also source you scientific papers disproving viruses all together.
Hes right in a sense, what the point of sourcing when you have to independently fact check a source?
It's a simple calculation. If the source is in line with a belief I already hold, it's real. If it's in conflict with what I already believe, it's fake news.
So I must trust only his words?
That's not researching. That's religious ideology.
You should look around this site, users post links in here. Are they all liers?
Let me show you the top 3 posts:
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOj4PiNM/guess-who-owns-onlyfans/c/ - providing a link.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOeLVKR0/get-your-kids-down-to-the-milita/c/ - providing a link.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOeJDieA/as-jewish-as-it-gets/c/ - proving a link.
Should we ban them or what?
no no, the opposite. trust no words from anyone, even sources. BIll Copper said it best. Trust nothing you cant prove with your own research
But I provided the top posts that include a link to help out researchers in the previous comment...
Yes, everyone can do their own research, but this page is made to help people out.
What are you even saying? That we should never provide links?
No links to help out researchers, you mean. Twitter posts don't count.
First one has a link, but it is to a Twitter page (not a source).
Second one has no link or source, just a screenshot of a Twitter post.
Third one has no links at all.
Why'd you need to lie?
Oh, and it's "liars".
You're making excuses to act helpless. Aka source trolling.