Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
These Look Like Just Regular Photos of the Moon (hubblesite.org) Fact
posted 1 year ago by Questionable 1 year ago by Questionable +6 / -2
31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Never backpedaled on anything. You have no argument, no evidence, no citations, no resources, and nothing to back your patently false claims. Your backpedaling, Alinsky, involves pretending satellites don’t exist while claiming you don’t believe that.

Cameras exist. Satellites exist. Cameras on satellites exist. Cameras on satellites have taken pictures of things in space. Nothing you say or do will ever changes this reality.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I'm not going to sit here and argue with you until the heat death of the universe, simply because you believe that you are the arbiter of objective reality, simply by claiming:

Cameras exist.

Fail & A.I.D.S

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

you believe that you are the arbiter

Never said. Stop projecting your own worldview onto others. Sophistry is objectively incorrect.

[other spam]

Oh, so you’re literally just trolling, I see.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Questionable [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You are acting as though you believe yourself to be the arbiter of objective reality.

Do you like that sentence better? Are you through playing dumb? Though arguing semantics? Finished trolling for reactions?

Now coo-dos to you! You garnered a reaction! You are the best troll ever!

̬

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TallestSkil 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

You are acting as though you believe yourself to be the arbiter of objective reality.

This isn’t happening. You are either illiterate or a sophist–and therefore incapable of comprehending the existence of objective truth. Which is it?

Do you like that sentence better?

It more effectively shows your inability to defend a single one of your claims, yes.

2+2=4.

I said it. That must mean I think I’m God Himself, because I repeated objective truth. Right?

Are you through playing dumb?

Irony.

Though arguing semantics?

Hasn’t happened.

Finished trolling for reactions?

Only sophists give a shit about emotions. Keep exposing yourself.

Now coo-dos to you! You garnered a reaction! You are the best troll ever!

You remain physically incapable of defending any of your claims or refuting anything I have said with citations or sources. Your persistence in personally attacking me is proof of this, otherwise you would simply have NOT tried to trick people into ignoring your physical incapability of defending any of your claims or refuting anything I have said with citations or sources.

Do not reply again.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy