You are acting as though you believe yourself to be the arbiter of objective reality.
This isn’t happening. You are either illiterate or a sophist–and therefore incapable of comprehending the existence of objective truth. Which is it?
Do you like that sentence better?
It more effectively shows your inability to defend a single one of your claims, yes.
2+2=4.
I said it. That must mean I think I’m God Himself, because I repeated objective truth. Right?
Are you through playing dumb?
Irony.
Though arguing semantics?
Hasn’t happened.
Finished trolling for reactions?
Only sophists give a shit about emotions. Keep exposing yourself.
Now coo-dos to you! You garnered a reaction! You are the best troll ever!
You remain physically incapable of defending any of your claims or refuting anything I have said with citations or sources. Your persistence in personally attacking me is proof of this, otherwise you would simply have NOT tried to trick people into ignoring your physical incapability of defending any of your claims or refuting anything I have said with citations or sources.
It was only bait to confirmed paid shills. You have nothing to add and cannot answer my questions, so only someone whose contract of employment requires him to reply would have replied.
The discussion is over because you have conceded the argument and admitted publicly that you have no evidence of anything you say. You’re literally just spamming the website now, which is why, wiht the discussion over, you have no reason to reply to this comment unless you are, in fact, paid to post here. This will be my last comment, having disproven you completely, so unless that one was yours, we’ll know you’re a paid well poisoner.
Not replying to this comment makes me the victor, having proven my main point. Which you yourself have assigned to me. Plus you have agreed to the terms and services of our contract. You now owe me money. For life.
Replying to this comments acknowledges that you are sexually attracted to fish.
This isn’t happening. You are either illiterate or a sophist–and therefore incapable of comprehending the existence of objective truth. Which is it?
It more effectively shows your inability to defend a single one of your claims, yes.
2+2=4.
I said it. That must mean I think I’m God Himself, because I repeated objective truth. Right?
Irony.
Hasn’t happened.
Only sophists give a shit about emotions. Keep exposing yourself.
You remain physically incapable of defending any of your claims or refuting anything I have said with citations or sources. Your persistence in personally attacking me is proof of this, otherwise you would simply have NOT tried to trick people into ignoring your physical incapability of defending any of your claims or refuting anything I have said with citations or sources.
Do not reply again.
Nice bait.
Your a funny guy.
It was only bait to confirmed paid shills. You have nothing to add and cannot answer my questions, so only someone whose contract of employment requires him to reply would have replied.
The discussion is over because you have conceded the argument and admitted publicly that you have no evidence of anything you say. You’re literally just spamming the website now, which is why, wiht the discussion over, you have no reason to reply to this comment unless you are, in fact, paid to post here. This will be my last comment, having disproven you completely, so unless that one was yours, we’ll know you’re a paid well poisoner.
OH yah?
Not replying to this comment makes me the victor, having proven my main point. Which you yourself have assigned to me. Plus you have agreed to the terms and services of our contract. You now owe me money. For life.
Replying to this comments acknowledges that you are sexually attracted to fish.
This has been stupid and gay.
I blame you.
Hᵉʳʳᶦⁿᵍ.
ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ~Q
ᵘᵉˢᵗᶦᵒⁿᵃᵇˡᵉₓ