In December 2021 NPCS were freaked out about how omicron was going to kill us all and then Ukraine gets curbstomped because of how it’s been genociding the Donbas and the normies forget Covid. And then Israel begins holocausting the Palestinians and the normies forget Ukraine and start only focusing on Israel/Gaza.
I’m not sure whether it’s funny or depressing how the switch just gets turned off for the old current thing.
Funny, right up until you consider the innumerable ways their behavior can and does affect your life and mine, including things like taking everything you have and killing you.
Then terrifying.
^this.
If they could NOT touch me legally, administratively and through taxes, laws and regulations + forced pharma, then I'd just just following all news/propaganda/lies.
The only reason I get entangled in their webs of lies is because I'm trying to avoid being caught in their next attack as a gullible fool.
Either way you do it, you are caught: either in their lies or in their next attack. Or both.
Still, try to live your life, pay minimal attention, but DO pay attention and believe NONE of their lies.
Almost none of them are real people.
At this point, the Internet is dominated by hundreds-of-millions of bots & shills.
You can find some mindless pack followers who will hop on board but they are an extreme minority.
The vast majority are bots & shills.
How exactly are you the protagonist in all this?
a) PRO (forward) AG (to drive, draw out or forth, move) aka being AG (life) within PRO (inception towards death).
b) -ist (protagonist) implies ones consent to follow suggested -ism (protagonism) by another, which tempts one to antagonize self.
none of that makes sense
a) Is life being moved forwards from inception towards death?
b) Does inception imply life being drawn out through forwards motion?
c) https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=protagonist
d) Pro, from prōtos (first); from root -per (forward), hence first forwards motion (inception towards death), then life within...
e) Agon (contest); from root ag- (to drive, draw out or forth, move), hence the living struggle within the process of dying to sustain self.
f) All -isms are suggested by others; each -ist implies ones consent to the suggestions by others. Nature doesn't make suggestions, it offer perceivable to each ones perception.
Suggestion (fiction) tempts one to ignore perception (reality).
d) none aka no; not; nothing; nothingness and negation of one...how could one sense nothing? https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=none
What if others suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt one to deny perceivable for suggested? Hence ignoring one-self for what others ones (chosen ones) are suggesting?
How to invert being one? Suggesting not being one aka "none" (nihilism) which tricks other ones to consent to it (nihilist).
Wouldn't this be the same thing as us?
Yeah sounds like we forgot there is a literal COMMUNIST MASS GENOCIDE in the works as all the exciting Pizzagate and Epstein and Gaza distractions are happening.
The real threat is the communist revolution that is about to strike America, 5 years maximum. Nobody can save you and nobody will save you but yourself from this before it happens, and whenever it does happen, you will DIE and there is nothing you can do about it.
Look into a mirror...that image exists at a different position than oneself looking at it. How could one perceive sameness if everything one looks at implies a different position?
What is ones (singular) position within us (plural)? A contradiction of self!
a) So then why suggest pluralism (us) to speak in the name of others?
b) Why do chosen ones utilize US (United States) to brand many under the motto "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one)?
a) Normie; normal; norm implies holding onto something.
b) Current implies motion and moment implies momentum of motion.
Those who ignore momentum of motion are holding onto norms, hence going through life on monkey-bars...grabbing one norm, while letting go of another.