Is the rise in “street takeovers” a push for walking cities?
(media.scored.co)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Walking cities discourage street takeovers by reducing the space and opportunities for disruptive activities like illegal gatherings or demonstrations.
A focus on walkability often means narrower streets, limited parking, and increased surveillance, making it more challenging for large groups to obstruct traffic or engage in disruptive behavior (unless its BLM, of course).
European cities are walkable but have just as many if not more retarded protestors when compared to americas car cities. German walkable cities had massive protests in support of legalizing human-animal marriage recently.
Don't forget fucking BIKE LANES, which cause traffic problems all day every day in my city (and this is coming from a pedestrian.) Nobody needs fucking "bike lanes," drivers just need to watch where the fuck they are going rather than trying to watch porn while they drive.
Bikes should use the fucking sidewalk. They dont have insurance or pay road tax through gas taxes and registration fees. They have no right to use the roads. But a mountain bike you granola eating leg shaving losers.
I don't know how that last sentence fits in.
We used to goto the street races when I was in high school. The difference is the response now. The cops used to break up the races and impound cars. Now, they don't even show up.
My city had a walk only downtown. They're currently taking it away for cars.
I thought the pedestrian only town centers in Swiss towns were great. They typically had underground parking so you could drive to the area.
Problem: Lawlessness (encouraged by lack of enforcement)
Reaction: Public demands more policing and arrests
Solution: Police state
Yeah and there's a related agenda called Vision Zero where they'll use any traffic related injuries as proof they need to further dilapidate the infrastructure
no, niggers
how about fucking arrest them? oh wait.. you have soros DA's...
"you think you hate the media.. but trust me.. you dont hate them enough"