Is the rise in “street takeovers” a push for walking cities?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Walking cities discourage street takeovers by reducing the space and opportunities for disruptive activities like illegal gatherings or demonstrations.
A focus on walkability often means narrower streets, limited parking, and increased surveillance, making it more challenging for large groups to obstruct traffic or engage in disruptive behavior (unless its BLM, of course).
European cities are walkable but have just as many if not more retarded protestors when compared to americas car cities. German walkable cities had massive protests in support of legalizing human-animal marriage recently.
Don't forget fucking BIKE LANES, which cause traffic problems all day every day in my city (and this is coming from a pedestrian.) Nobody needs fucking "bike lanes," drivers just need to watch where the fuck they are going rather than trying to watch porn while they drive.
Bikes should use the fucking sidewalk. They dont have insurance or pay road tax through gas taxes and registration fees. They have no right to use the roads. But a mountain bike you granola eating leg shaving losers.
I don't know how that last sentence fits in.