For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.
And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God." (John 3:16-21 ESV)
THE SATANIC HIP HOP INDUSTRY EXPOSED: PART 1 (FULL DOCUMENTARY)
"Love your enemies"
hahahhahHAHAHHA
Must have been written by a jew
That's what differ us from jews who follow another principle of loving only their own and hating everyone else.
When you don't hate your enemies, it is much easier to make right decisions and do the right things. When you love your enemy, you know it. And knowledge is power. That does not mean you don't need to resist or fight for yourself or protect your beloved ones. It mean that you exclude a harmful variable that distract and blind you.
It is just practical and beneficial to behave this way.
What if the jewish revolutionary spirit implies choosing to resist following others?
What if a jew suggests moralism to tempt consenting gentiles into a conflict of reason (love vs hate)?
What if holding onto a side (love or hate) conceals exerted power in-between (choice)? Choosing either side establishes a conflict between both.
a) What if one needs to resist what another suggests? What if temptation isn't a fight one can win, but a momentum one balances in? What if growing resistance is the only protection for solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)?
b) "be-loved ones"...what comes first? Being one or loving another?
Ex implies expression outwards; clude aka claudere (to close) implies inwards.Meanwhile...natural order (inception towards death) opens up expressions inwards (life).
That's literally written in the Bible.
I think you know this, but that book is the most successful scam in human history. Essentially normalizing Blood God worship and uses the "We are the Real Jews" community more than the LGBTs who cry "we are LGBT who oppose the LGBT agenda" as they judge europe by destroying all the hiygene systems and letting all the pagans and peasants die to rat plague.
"'I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich) and the slander of those who say that they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. (Revelation 2:9 ESV)
Behold, I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie—behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you. (Revelation 3:9 ESV)
a) LOVE (evol/evil) EN-MI (within me)
b) EVOL aka EVOLVE, verb - "to open itself; to disclose itself"...if only one could wield the free will of choice to open (need) or disclose (want) self. Notice that want implies from another, hence disclosing self (consent) to another (suggestion)...