Why are flat earthers such retards XDDDDd1!!!
(media.scored.co)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
It's because it's a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop.
There are no flat earthers; just agents and products of the psyop.
They are contrived to sound so offensively stupid so you won't ever seriously consider, discuss, or research the subject because of how valuable it is.
Imagine spending so much money on an ad campaign to make something (the idea that the world is flat) already ostensibly stupid by default seem even stupider. Highly curious, wouldn't you say?
Methinks the woman doth protest too much...
I think its kinda retarded that someone with the name Jesus in there handle has issues with alternative cosmological models when the whole first book of your bible is about biblical cosmology.
Biblical cosmology has nothing to do with actualy cosmology. what is in the Bible is deeply esoteric and kabalistic.
it's not about me but about the objective truth, dumbfuck. You guys can't stop adressing the person. Oh if it's not about me, then it's about my personality, if not it's about my tone, if not about my location/race, if not it's about my username, everything else but the actual comment.
let me say it once: flat earthers are factually retarded. I looked into this shit and is fake and you're a dumbfuck retard schizoshit if you believe this.
Notice how when anybody goes after somebody that believes in a conspiracy the two insults they come at you with are "Lol bet you believe in flat earth too you q-tard"
It's obvious they are meant to discredit actual legit weird shit people have noticed by getting the public to conflate legit shit with crackhead gay-ops.
poisoning the well is the only thing they got. weak willed seek solace in numbers
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/17rmOGpGT2/is-ufreewillofchoice-mentally-re/c
Your actual comments are always pure schizo shit word salad, so I will address both content and person:
About free-will-of-choice... Post Score (0) + Comment Score (10997)
Sticks and stones...
i don't believe in anything. belief is for the weak and ignorant.
a) "don't" implies that one believes nothing can be done.
b) consider the difference between...anything; everything and nothing. Could they coexist at the same moment?
Can one prove "nothing"? What if using "don't" implies ones acceptance of ones denial? Could others suggest nihilism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt ones consent to accept ones denial of perceivable?
You're a braindead retard if you think that the earth is flat.
I make no claims, I just don't accept unprovable theory as fact. Plain and simple.
And the exact same thing can be said about your belief in Jesus. A man who was both god and his son, a man who could walk on water and come back to life.
Being partial (son) implies within whole (god).
Solid (life) walking on fluid (inception towards death).
Flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death)...transmutation of partials (growth) within whole (loss).
Aka ones consent to how the suggestions of others (information) describe perceivable (inspiration)...former tempts one to hold onto; while latter moves through one.
so what's the truth then? is it flat or round? or too braindead to not know?
Crater Earth says it's both. But you would know that since you've already 'looked into it' and aren't just venomously attacking people as retards. Right? You already know the answer to your own Question correct?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QetnEQ2pszMr/
Again I make no claims because i don't know the extent and make up of our reality. Its ok not to know, its not ok to spout ignorant shit and discourage free thought because it doesn't fit your individual dogma.
if something is "true" then it should be provable, if you've actually looked into this you'd realise that we don't even have a working cosmological model. There actively trying to re work the whole thing because the theory we created in the 1600s doesn't match actual data.
no it's not you braindead chimp.
Everything was (perceivable); before anyone within can suggest what it is.
Implies reasoning about suggested (fiction) while ignoring perceivable (reality).
Knowledge implies perceivable...nothing (not) implies as suggested by others. Can one perceive nothing?
Why are all flightsystems ands gps based upon a flat stationary plane, makes no sense if it werent true.
It also means that conversion would only make it a lot more complicated.
You havent researched anything only to be saying its fake. If you did, you would be at least on the fence about it. But your acting like a diehard science believer.
"gps based upon a flat stationary plane"
Nonsense. I worked in GPS at Trimble Navigation. GPS uses a complex 3D geometry. Not a trace of flat earth in it. GPS is based on satellites rotating around a spherical planet and sending signals through a 3D space. Ground receivers compute their position based on data from a 3D space; it's all 3D geometry plus a little special relativity to adjust for time changes due to motion.
There are maybe three kinds of flat earthers, in descending order of true stupidity:
I did research. It's the law of correspondence. as above so below. all atoms, molecules and even fruits and vegetables have a toroidal field, aka are roundy aka have a certain flatness.
if this is the below. the above is just the same. that's how it works it's quite simple.
Without the use of NASA, no one can prove what we live on.