Obviously you arent capable of being an impartial juror if you are already strongly prejudiced against certain groups of people, right?
Prejudiced is a broad term that is offend defined as needed.
This presents an interesting dichotomy as your if one is well versed with the "negative", yet statistical relevant facts of a particular race this line of thinking would imply you're not suitable to sit in a jury. (Such that statistically black men are more likely to be violent offenders)
So the alternative is juries are composed of those individuals who are ignorant of such facts and are then slanted in the FAVOR of the minority AND perhaps against the interests of society.
I don't know what the solution is. Everyone deserves a free and fair trial.
Funny thing is, the guy who says I’m not capable of being an impartial juror admits he convicted a man who had been exonerated by dna during the trial but he still convicted him because he was left handed.
“Victory” as if they are in a war or something?
It’s not a war any more than a war between humans and ants.
You really seem Jewish. First off suggesting I should have acquitted a nigger when I was on a jury and now defending the Jews.
Im not defending jews, im pointing out that this Israeli-Hamas thing isn’t a “war” at all, but rather an extermination.
whats wrong with acquitting defendants?
obviously you arent capable of being an impartial juror if you are already strongly prejudiced against certain groups of people, right?
https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmJZ2zzy/x/c/4Z7QYIBGFIi?d=50
https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmJUTUqH/x/c/4Z7QXzSsbf2
https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmABga49/x/c/4Tz2sg0FcaP
https://conspiracies.win/p/17rmAAZIH3/x/c/4Tz2sg0FLjk
The way you capitalize jews, maybe you are jewish?
So then you seriously honestly think I should have acquitted a nigger (or a person of any race) who shot somebody dead in a cold case?
Holy fuck.
Yeah bro let’s acquit random gang bangers that shoot people dead for drug money just because it’s wrong to convict people.
oy vey.
i wasnt there so i dont know the circumstances,
But i can tell you i was on a jury who convicted a man who was ruled out by DNA evidence,
but who was left-handed, and the robber carried the gun in his left hand…
Prejudiced is a broad term that is offend defined as needed.
This presents an interesting dichotomy as your if one is well versed with the "negative", yet statistical relevant facts of a particular race this line of thinking would imply you're not suitable to sit in a jury. (Such that statistically black men are more likely to be violent offenders)
So the alternative is juries are composed of those individuals who are ignorant of such facts and are then slanted in the FAVOR of the minority AND perhaps against the interests of society.
I don't know what the solution is. Everyone deserves a free and fair trial.
Funny thing is, the guy who says I’m not capable of being an impartial juror admits he convicted a man who had been exonerated by dna during the trial but he still convicted him because he was left handed.
Holy fuck lol.