Obviously you arent capable of being an impartial juror if you are already strongly prejudiced against certain groups of people, right?
Prejudiced is a broad term that is offend defined as needed.
This presents an interesting dichotomy as your if one is well versed with the "negative", yet statistical relevant facts of a particular race this line of thinking would imply you're not suitable to sit in a jury. (Such that statistically black men are more likely to be violent offenders)
So the alternative is juries are composed of those individuals who are ignorant of such facts and are then slanted in the FAVOR of the minority AND perhaps against the interests of society.
I don't know what the solution is. Everyone deserves a free and fair trial.
Funny thing is, the guy who says I’m not capable of being an impartial juror admits he convicted a man who had been exonerated by dna during the trial but he still convicted him because he was left handed.
Prejudiced is a broad term that is offend defined as needed.
This presents an interesting dichotomy as your if one is well versed with the "negative", yet statistical relevant facts of a particular race this line of thinking would imply you're not suitable to sit in a jury. (Such that statistically black men are more likely to be violent offenders)
So the alternative is juries are composed of those individuals who are ignorant of such facts and are then slanted in the FAVOR of the minority AND perhaps against the interests of society.
I don't know what the solution is. Everyone deserves a free and fair trial.
Funny thing is, the guy who says I’m not capable of being an impartial juror admits he convicted a man who had been exonerated by dna during the trial but he still convicted him because he was left handed.
Holy fuck lol.