Right, because AI creates faces based on millions of average real human features. So the result is the most human like face that anyone can recognize as normal. The real humans are unique and some have very “unique” (I didn’t say ugly) features, hence can seem “off”
Right, because AI creates faces based on millions of average real human features. So the result is the most human like face that anyone can recognize as normal.
Exactly. And this faces are not "AI generated". "AI" is not AI at all. And it just could not generate or create anything. It is a dumb algorithm to calculate most probable result from what was used to adjust it.
Right, because AI creates faces based on millions of average real human features. So the result is the most human like face that anyone can recognize as normal. The real humans are unique and some have very “unique” (I didn’t say ugly) features, hence can seem “off”
Exactly. And this faces are not "AI generated". "AI" is not AI at all. And it just could not generate or create anything. It is a dumb algorithm to calculate most probable result from what was used to adjust it.
i.e. it was generated
F.e. electricity is generated when some other energy type turning into electricity. If you make 5V from 220V it is not a generation.
link to the paper not the newspaper for retards, retard
if you read it, you'd find they are cherry picked photos
"AI faces were screened"
Anything to convince you to take that black pill suppository.
Why don't you link to it mr snark!
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976231207095
The only solution is to not trust random humans you see on a screen, as was always the case.
Thats because none of them look like juice