How Jewish Terrorism Created Israel
(twitter.com)
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Syrian Girl gives a much needed history lesson
Direct link to the video:
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1713207525284450304/vid/avc1/1280x720/9gV5UupPXsIaiKxI.mp4?tag=14
Definitely interesting and credible as it was common practice (and still is) to force migrate large swathes of people from one land to another with no thought to issues stemming from these forced migrations.
Crash course of history for the past 80 years... really informative vid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avraham_Stern#
jews suggest -ism (temptation); gentiles consent to terror (Latin terreo; fear). A terror-ist implies a gentile consenting to suggested terror-ism by a jew.
Fear (and hope) implies towards outcome; being implies within (life) origin (inception towards death). "There's nothing to fear but fear itself". Nature implies generating origin; being implies re-generating product within origin; being among others implies the temptation to ignore origin (perceivable) for outcomes (suggestion).
How about how Palestine was nothing else. Literally nothing but a poor population of a supposed people constantly taxed and subjugated by surrounding kingdoms, enslaving them, and sending them off to war, against themselves.
But as soon as it became Israel there was no end of what Palestine should've been. Somebody else tell the class what they think it should've been. It was irrelevant in history except for its constant conflict.
Until it is nothing but a divide and a sponge. The biggest sponge in the World causing a divide. The only other thing as dividing is the Troon. Palestinians are also zealots
How is any country any different from what you say? And BTW why are you so emotional lately?
No fucks animals, Turtle, Bam. The poor tortoise. I am not emotional. You are.
Check Palestinian history. It was never a country. It was a domicile. Where any population outside of historic Jerusalem a religious city, were often the subjects of squalid peasantry, where it simply recruited them into war against their neighbours.
Palestine was never a country, it was a domicile. A territory of others. Today some have tried to make such claims. Only because of another country Israel present in such they've acclaimed.
Hence a huge divide by the World's biggest sponge absorbing everybody else into it claiming it's not Israel.
Until Israel has become another sacrifice. It provokes an entire religion who seek its destruction so they can return to warring against themselves.
I give up there I do. It is what is. Sides, divided by another notion it is not the other. But it has never been.
According to your logic, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, etc.. are also "domiciles", since they too were part of the Ottoman empire.
Try again, studying history. Morocco was far bigger historically, at points, it went to the Sudan at one point, and although Islamic warred against Egypt and the Ottomans and Europe for its own power. Where it spanned North Africa, and also quite a lot of the Med.
Of course there has been succession of conflict providing our nations today.
LOL you are really desperate, was it called Morocco? What was its boundaries? Were those fixed? So you just lumped Almohads and you picked Morocco for convenience, but it also included Algeria, Tunisia and Libya why did you pick Morocco? So if Algeria, Tunisia and Libya are out, are those domiciles? Maybe inbred Jews from Khazaria have a right to annex them as well? And I forgot, what about the Amazighs?
You guys try to convince yourself that it's ok to steal other people's land and kill them all. One can understand given your genetics and lowly moral compass and upbringing that you see nothing wrong in it. But maybe you should look deeper into yourself instead of fixating on bestiality which from your previous comments you seem to be preoccupied with. Again, I do not blame you knowing how rabbis think and bring up their children.
You're an animal fucker. You know nothing about history.
Because Morocco was the dominating Empire there for 100s of years as Islam emerged, until around the 1800s. Prior to it there were others like Libya, the Romans. After it fell, the region divided into more wars, Libya, Egypt, Eritrea/Ethiopia, Algeria invasions and conquests.
Historically you know the Moors. Morocoo was set to invade Spain all over again. It literally rallied all of North Africa, it went all the way to Sudan at one point. Egypt was a rival.
It has a very rich history. Like others influenced by Islam. Except it was its own entity it fought to maintain its power. But it got crushed in a few wars then. Possibly the Barbary as well as competition and others.
What are we even debating. You're posing hypotheticals. Countries didn't exist until much later. There were kingdoms, and city states, domiciles, Sultanates. They fought as much among themselves as any other threat turning them into their perspective nations later. Countries emerged after the fall of Empires WW1, effectively, otherwise far more was provincial rule.
When we look at maps of the 1800s when a lot of Empires fell, most hadn't nationalise into countries until later. Huge regions either from colonisation, or competing kingdoms, and Empires. The map started getting smaller turning into its nations. After WW2 is when have our globe today. WW1 was the fall of Empires. Prior was a succession of wars and kingdoms.
You start talking about these countries today many are wrapped in conquest. Many shared Emperical rule, or were competing kingdoms, or provinces of other Empires. The map was vastly different not long ago.
Emmm.. so a domicile is not the "dominating" entity and is allowed to be stolen. So, let's say inbred Khazars decide to steal Ohio, is it alright? it's not Washington DC so it's just a domicile isn't?
So what do you think of the Levant (Which includes Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Palestine and parts of Iraq). Is it allowed to be stolen by inbred Khazars?
And is Sudan a domicile? Or do you give it the right to exist and not be stolen by inbred Khazars?
Oh shit, I forgot. Didn't the Jews only supposedly stay in Palestine for what? 80 years? Where they had two separate domiciles fighting each other, both being dominated by others? And they never had anything to do with the south of Palestine? All according to your fake Torah history which you take for granted of course, not to mention so called modern Jews have nothing to do with so called historical Jews. Ask a keifeng Jew or a Falasha and he knows he has nothing to do with Palestine.
Didn't the Yabosean canaanites Arabs create states long before the Jews so called first state thousands of supposed years ago?
Ok…I keep hearing the “Palestine was not a country” jargon, and I understand what people are trying to say…but I don’t think it fucking matters if they were a country or if they weren’t. They’re a people who have lived on the land for centuries, and suddenly, some foreign fucks come along and divide it up, then splat your ideological enemies right in the middle. Now it’s ok to bulldoze people’s homes, imprison them, torture them, shoot at them, destroy their property, steal from them…because they’re not a country? What the fuck? If you’re going to invade and take land, and if you’re going to displace the people living on it, you can do it in a benevolent way. Zionists are fucking pig-sick with money. They can pay the people there for their homes, they can improve the lives of the people there so that they win their support. Do they do that? No. They act like filthy, barbaric gibbons and it’s a fucking tragedy through and through.
Haha a poor people living in squalid peasantry constantly drafted into war by their domicile calling them into conflict against each other. While the Jews there obviously maintained a better class of gentry for any other pilgrims.
That's the problem. If they weren't a country, how can they claim it is Palestine? It wasn't a country.
What would Palestine be today? It would only be in civil war like its neighbours.
You’re being stupid on purpose, right? It doesn’t MATTER if it’s not a country. You can’t torture and annihilate people. Can we just fence in Nevada and starve the people there and bomb them because they’re not a country? No, that would be fucked up.
No you are cannot spell.
You haven’t used proper grammar ONCE, son. You obviously don’t even speak English.
Yes, but Israel existing and being backed by the west makes Palestine our problem now. Their western backing has injected advanced and deadly weapons into the system, making everything worse.
Just evacuate Israel, and let the rest of the middle east deal with it.
No. They faster descend on themselves unless they're fighting the globe. That's if somebody else strong enough bangs all their heads together first. Yea Israel keeps it localised. Irony I am sure.
Seriously I give up there. Israel is the nation anything else is hearsay.