You're an animal fucker. You know nothing about history.

Because Morocco was the dominating Empire there for 100s of years as Islam emerged, until around the 1800s. Prior to it there were others like Libya, the Romans. After it fell, the region divided into more wars, Libya, Egypt, Eritrea/Ethiopia, Algeria invasions and conquests.

Historically you know the Moors. Morocoo was set to invade Spain all over again. It literally rallied all of North Africa, it went all the way to Sudan at one point. Egypt was a rival.

It has a very rich history. Like others influenced by Islam. Except it was its own entity it fought to maintain its power. But it got crushed in a few wars then. Possibly the Barbary as well as competition and others.

What are we even debating. You're posing hypotheticals. Countries didn't exist until much later. There were kingdoms, and city states, domiciles, Sultanates. They fought as much among themselves as any other threat turning them into their perspective nations later. Countries emerged after the fall of Empires WW1, effectively, otherwise far more was provincial rule.

When we look at maps of the 1800s when a lot of Empires fell, most hadn't nationalise into countries until later. Huge regions either from colonisation, or competing kingdoms, and Empires. The map started getting smaller turning into its nations. After WW2 is when have our globe today. WW1 was the fall of Empires. Prior was a succession of wars and kingdoms.

You start talking about these countries today many are wrapped in conquest. Many shared Emperical rule, or were competing kingdoms, or provinces of other Empires. The map was vastly different not long ago.