Friction slows this. Even the gravitational differential of the planet slows this. It is physically impossible to have a system without energy losses, and it is physically impossible to draw energy out of this system for useful work without reducing the total energy in the system. There is no perpetual motion and can never be.
The loss will come in the form of heat. Touch such an apparatus after some use and you'll know first hand. Anyways this happens because the conductors are not perfect and there is no such. Supposed superconductors will require quite a bit of energy to maintain such a state so there's no net free lunch here as such
I don't know much about electrical engineering. One thing I would suggest is posting any progress and blueprints you have in as many places as you can. If you have really discovered free energy, you have a pretty big target on your back. If you plan to sell or commercialize it, you should take out some life insurance policies.
There is no free lunch. You may be able to get something to continue moving, but try harvesting ANY of that energy and it falls flat on it's face. The key will be to discover what combination of existing ambient inputs can create harvestable energy. Plants are an example, and yet they will deplete nutrients in the soil around them over time unless it is replenished
It's trivial to charge a system and then run it for some brief duration for a demonstration. Some scams hide batteries in them. Videos aren't a useful proof of anything.
If you want to prove yourself, run a bitcoin farm off of it.
The purpose of coils is to increase the current for a given magnetic flux. Or decrease the RPM so less magnetic flux is necessary.
If there is any momentum in the system, that's just the normal inertia which has not yet been converted to electrical energy. Which, in turn, can be a result of the lack of coils not capturing the magnetic flux.
Sure it spins with magnetism and momentum, but to generate any substantial amount of electricity you will need to use metal windings of a determined length.
This is going to add weight, meaning you need bigger magnets to move the weight and better bearing materials. You also need structural bracing to keep the machine stable for high efficiency. Bracing will add to the energy cost substantially if it is made of metal.
The energy cost to make one of these needs to be overcome within the devices life at bare minimum. If you keep repairs to a minimum and durability to a maximum, maybe?
Can you walk us through how this is supposed to work, and where the surplus energy is coming from?
If the two moving plates are identical and moving in the same direction how/why should one end up with an excess and one a efficiency of electrons? Is one grounded? A LOT of necessary details seem missing from this diagram.
I have often wondered if you could create a magnet motor, swap out the pistons with electromagnets, swap out the spark plugs with an electrode that switches polarity, attracting the magnets up and repelling them down as needed. It’s probably been tried by now.
Then it isn’t free.
It can’t be.
Friction slows this. Even the gravitational differential of the planet slows this. It is physically impossible to have a system without energy losses, and it is physically impossible to draw energy out of this system for useful work without reducing the total energy in the system. There is no perpetual motion and can never be.
But that’s perpetual power in and no ability to remove any of it for work.
The loss will come in the form of heat. Touch such an apparatus after some use and you'll know first hand. Anyways this happens because the conductors are not perfect and there is no such. Supposed superconductors will require quite a bit of energy to maintain such a state so there's no net free lunch here as such
I don't know much about electrical engineering. One thing I would suggest is posting any progress and blueprints you have in as many places as you can. If you have really discovered free energy, you have a pretty big target on your back. If you plan to sell or commercialize it, you should take out some life insurance policies.
There is no free lunch. You may be able to get something to continue moving, but try harvesting ANY of that energy and it falls flat on it's face. The key will be to discover what combination of existing ambient inputs can create harvestable energy. Plants are an example, and yet they will deplete nutrients in the soil around them over time unless it is replenished
Have you built a working model? If yes, then comes the challenge of quantifying the action and predicting the work that could be harvested
What am I even looking at.
neat, let's see it in practice
It's trivial to charge a system and then run it for some brief duration for a demonstration. Some scams hide batteries in them. Videos aren't a useful proof of anything.
If you want to prove yourself, run a bitcoin farm off of it.
Your diagram is shit. It's a generator.
The purpose of coils is to increase the current for a given magnetic flux. Or decrease the RPM so less magnetic flux is necessary.
If there is any momentum in the system, that's just the normal inertia which has not yet been converted to electrical energy. Which, in turn, can be a result of the lack of coils not capturing the magnetic flux.
Why u no build it then
I am sure you did. Post pics
Lol
This seems super simple. What is its efficiency?
Sure it spins with magnetism and momentum, but to generate any substantial amount of electricity you will need to use metal windings of a determined length.
This is going to add weight, meaning you need bigger magnets to move the weight and better bearing materials. You also need structural bracing to keep the machine stable for high efficiency. Bracing will add to the energy cost substantially if it is made of metal.
The energy cost to make one of these needs to be overcome within the devices life at bare minimum. If you keep repairs to a minimum and durability to a maximum, maybe?
Id like to see more.
whats are the materials being used in this diagram?
Can you walk us through how this is supposed to work, and where the surplus energy is coming from?
If the two moving plates are identical and moving in the same direction how/why should one end up with an excess and one a efficiency of electrons? Is one grounded? A LOT of necessary details seem missing from this diagram.
I have often wondered if you could create a magnet motor, swap out the pistons with electromagnets, swap out the spark plugs with an electrode that switches polarity, attracting the magnets up and repelling them down as needed. It’s probably been tried by now.