Like the Rebbe promised the Khazarians will be back and rebuild the Great Khazaria, Heavenly Jerusalem (aka New Jerusalem, Israel 2.0, Big Israel). But, first they have to evict the slavs.
They never had an Empire. It wasn't Cuckeria either. Cuckeria is a mythical proxy. A proxy of every other Empire. Countless. Or it belonged to the horde. It never amounted historically to being much else, then getting cucked.
I am sure it claims a richer history of agriculture, because it fed Empires, or they pillaged it.
I have no idea what Khazaria was. Because it weren't Jewish. It was Greek. Greeks spread Christainity later as well.
Are the two similar is a much bigger conspiracy, we won't go there. The New Testament was written by Greeks. Surely rewritten again we won't go there. Who was what, is what. What was.
But historically the Black Sea was fully colonised. Bulgarian ruins are some of the oldest in Europe, we're talking well into the stone age. Outside of Turkey. Of course Georgian go back a very long time, the earliest winemakers dating back 10k years. They show huge evidence of land washed away. Settlements up the Black Sea gone. Like the Minoans. But they're supposedly later.
However this whole Khazaria nonsense is gibberish. Utter fucking rubbish. Perhaps I've heard of the Khazars but weren't they Tartars. Dunno don't care. Can't be bothered.
Romans used Ukraine like the Greeks before them for agriculture. Agreed it might be older, but Odesa, the oldest city in Ukraine, was supposedly founded during the Greeks. Of course both the Huns and Mongols decimated it. Then it was largely Ottoman. Then Imperial Russian because breakaway Tartars offered the coast to the Russians as a protectorate. We know what happened afterwards.
I've done this in another topic Russia, Moscow, was founded by Greek missionaries, from the Ukraine, Ukrainian royalty, cannonised by the Holy Roman Empire, Centralised Moscow as the choice of rule. Later Czars were born. Otherwise there were wars against the horde. Huns, Tartars, Mongols, and Viking conversion.
To be honest and I don't mean to be antisemitic. What is a jew? Some mythological pretext. The Hebrew, Israelite is largely an assumption, a paradox, becoming, after the fall of Babylon. Coexisting alongside the Greeks who destroyed Tyre and effectively birthed Alexandria.
That doesn't explain shit. It's fictitious. What was a Khazar. Not reading that shit? Tell me exactly what they are.
The Ukrainian Royalty canonised by the Romans founding Moscow from the former Greeks founding the Ukraine? Not Jews. Jews are a myth. A modern myth. They were Hebrews. They got destroyed by Rome. They didn't colonised anywhere else. Apart from spreading out into founded domiciles of other kingdoms. Are they a horde of Barbarians? Or what?
I've provided history I can back up. You've provided fiction. Anybody looking at the time period and simply Google the period reading maps and history and otherwise. If they can research, instead of using the book of fables the bible, or an amusingly fragmented education, claiming there's no such thing as Kiev because chickens didn't exist. No sir, it was called the Khazar. The what?
But okay for the sake of their glorious mudhuts along the Dniper. It was a tiny little region of past Empirical rule. Constantly ravished by the horde, and any Empires, not Khazarian.
Today who knows what their claim is. It's completely ironic.
Hahaha. That was confronting. No I am not American, I'm English.
But we're talking history not mythology. Mythology you've based your educational pretext on. It ain't factual. The Bible fundamentally isn't. Nadda, zilch, baloney, and irony. Rewritten, rephrased, gibberish, an adaptation off of surrounding lore.
Thank you my friend. I agree. This I am finding fascinating. I am very self taught. When I research I try to dive through it. History is a conspiracy. The eye of the believer. A narrative of its Victor's.
However there is anomaly here.
Calling the Tartars, past Sythians, formerly Nimrod, something else. Khazars.
When the region it had Empirical rule. It obviously had hierarchy. It did when it converted. If we go through history. Perhaps Turkic, Babylonian, Greek, Odesa a Greek name, Roman, Holy Roman, Ottoman, Russian.
There are no camels. And Jews. Yes the Jewish people spread on the destruction of Jerusalem.
Like the Rebbe promised the Khazarians will be back and rebuild the Great Khazaria, Heavenly Jerusalem (aka New Jerusalem, Israel 2.0, Big Israel). But, first they have to evict the slavs.
They never had an Empire. It wasn't Cuckeria either. Cuckeria is a mythical proxy. A proxy of every other Empire. Countless. Or it belonged to the horde. It never amounted historically to being much else, then getting cucked.
I am sure it claims a richer history of agriculture, because it fed Empires, or they pillaged it.
I have no idea what Khazaria was. Because it weren't Jewish. It was Greek. Greeks spread Christainity later as well.
Are the two similar is a much bigger conspiracy, we won't go there. The New Testament was written by Greeks. Surely rewritten again we won't go there. Who was what, is what. What was.
But historically the Black Sea was fully colonised. Bulgarian ruins are some of the oldest in Europe, we're talking well into the stone age. Outside of Turkey. Of course Georgian go back a very long time, the earliest winemakers dating back 10k years. They show huge evidence of land washed away. Settlements up the Black Sea gone. Like the Minoans. But they're supposedly later.
However this whole Khazaria nonsense is gibberish. Utter fucking rubbish. Perhaps I've heard of the Khazars but weren't they Tartars. Dunno don't care. Can't be bothered.
Romans used Ukraine like the Greeks before them for agriculture. Agreed it might be older, but Odesa, the oldest city in Ukraine, was supposedly founded during the Greeks. Of course both the Huns and Mongols decimated it. Then it was largely Ottoman. Then Imperial Russian because breakaway Tartars offered the coast to the Russians as a protectorate. We know what happened afterwards.
I've done this in another topic Russia, Moscow, was founded by Greek missionaries, from the Ukraine, Ukrainian royalty, cannonised by the Holy Roman Empire, Centralised Moscow as the choice of rule. Later Czars were born. Otherwise there were wars against the horde. Huns, Tartars, Mongols, and Viking conversion.
To be honest and I don't mean to be antisemitic. What is a jew? Some mythological pretext. The Hebrew, Israelite is largely an assumption, a paradox, becoming, after the fall of Babylon. Coexisting alongside the Greeks who destroyed Tyre and effectively birthed Alexandria.
I would say you're as dumb as they come. But, on second thought ... you're just a shill for the Khazarians.
That doesn't explain shit. It's fictitious. What was a Khazar. Not reading that shit? Tell me exactly what they are.
The Ukrainian Royalty canonised by the Romans founding Moscow from the former Greeks founding the Ukraine? Not Jews. Jews are a myth. A modern myth. They were Hebrews. They got destroyed by Rome. They didn't colonised anywhere else. Apart from spreading out into founded domiciles of other kingdoms. Are they a horde of Barbarians? Or what?
I've provided history I can back up. You've provided fiction. Anybody looking at the time period and simply Google the period reading maps and history and otherwise. If they can research, instead of using the book of fables the bible, or an amusingly fragmented education, claiming there's no such thing as Kiev because chickens didn't exist. No sir, it was called the Khazar. The what?
But okay for the sake of their glorious mudhuts along the Dniper. It was a tiny little region of past Empirical rule. Constantly ravished by the horde, and any Empires, not Khazarian.
Today who knows what their claim is. It's completely ironic.
Thank you my friend. They were Tartars. Then Ottomans. Then Russians.
They were also possibly Sythians.
The Tartars are largely Islamic not Jewish from the past Ottoman rule.
I think this Ep0ch dude is just a shill for the Khazarians. He just wants to please his masters, but he is as dumb as they come.
Hahaha. That was confronting. No I am not American, I'm English.
But we're talking history not mythology. Mythology you've based your educational pretext on. It ain't factual. The Bible fundamentally isn't. Nadda, zilch, baloney, and irony. Rewritten, rephrased, gibberish, an adaptation off of surrounding lore.
Thank you my friend. I agree. This I am finding fascinating. I am very self taught. When I research I try to dive through it. History is a conspiracy. The eye of the believer. A narrative of its Victor's.
However there is anomaly here.
Calling the Tartars, past Sythians, formerly Nimrod, something else. Khazars.
When the region it had Empirical rule. It obviously had hierarchy. It did when it converted. If we go through history. Perhaps Turkic, Babylonian, Greek, Odesa a Greek name, Roman, Holy Roman, Ottoman, Russian.
There are no camels. And Jews. Yes the Jewish people spread on the destruction of Jerusalem.
Its jews ordering Christians to kill other Christians, its a win-win regardless in their book.
The Chabad Mafia (aka Khazarian Mafia) is recapturing Khazaria and the Slavs must be evicted.
War is death magic.