Curiously when did it get criminalised in America? I should look it up. A few decades in any majority? 2007 according to the Wiki. 15 years.
How many states is it criminalised? All? State Wide.
I am not going to justify the stance of this topic. It's grey. Do I agree with it. Debatable. Some dogs breeds haven't got any other purpose.
It isn't criminalised in much of South/Central America, has Mexico for example criminalised it? Cock/Bull/Scorpion and presumably dog isn't
Give them an inch they take a mile. Until it's ban meat. Ban furs. Ban hunting. Censor free speech. Etc. Etc. Sick of it today. With animals is it cruelty? They'd fight to death in the wild. Should it be public. Not to the extents of a hound race, the same. No difference. One isn't a blood sport. Dog bred to run is the same nature as a dog bred to fight. So sick of that attitude of policing people to the extent their freedoms are curtailed. Did it harm anybody else. No, dangerous dogs that have no other function, sure some can be pets, until it bites another pet, didn't endanger the public, they fought. There was no harm except a hypocritical attitude. It simply wants to police your freedoms with its own toxicity, and its bullshit. It hasn't solved anything else.
Our nature is the enslavement of something, potentially not me with mine, beating something over the head, forcing it to do what you want, according to your hypocritical notions of what you think it should do, to the point of unquestionable obedience? Welcome to dystopia.
How about feeding that pet kibble? It has killed it in about 15 years lower than its potential lifespan. Pet food is their main killer. Dogs the longest lived, 30-35, share one thing in common, they didn't eat kibble or any other pet food, except a natural diet, their owners prepared.
We have a responsibility to let nature be nature, preserve nature. Not cull something because wahaa it offends us.
Now you want to kill dogs because they're animals? Where does that stop? If cows cause climate change, surely the African Savannah has to go. But at the same time you want to ban hunting? Peak retard.
Look there's the moon, no animals, how about you go and colonise it. You will never stop our nature. It is conflict. Our season. Our wildlife. Our planet. Ourselves.
No, dogs probably like my former reply on the wild fox, it eats out of his hand, he says sit, it cocks its head like a dog, then it was beautiful, it did it, again and again. It had a set and one of the pups he's befriended, almost the same trust, others went back to the Wild, but they all like the food. Food was the bond and love. It comes to his door and paws the glass. It would almost go inside. Not there yet. Dunno he wants that. His wife might. They're not petting it yet, almost. The problem is that almost any other dog would kill it, including the chiwawa. Their nature.
It like the Wolf gave us the dog, millennia and millennia later we have a bunch of breeds.
Not all breeds are anything other than pets. But they're animals. Animals are not humans. They're wild and can all become so, even the most loyal or domesticated.
Yes they protect livestock, and shepherd them, although some, it's their nature will attack them all the same.
Dogs don't bite the hand that feeds, generally, they're one of the most loyal out of almost all pets, and intelligent. Because dogs are pack animals, not solitary, you're their packmaster, if you have their trust. It means looking after it. Not being a cunt.
To other dogs, and other animals, some breeds, and others not their packmaster, pack, beware.
We aren't talking about that. We are talking about is a lion killing a zebra cruel. Quick ban it off TV, feed the lion vegetables. Wahaaa.
Should dog fighting be banned. No. Not in the right environment, and registery. Why not capitalise off it. Keep it away from kids. They fight anyway, and to their natural extremes. Everything is cruel. Giving life is cruel.
Dogs were the result of domestication for hunting. Not just raising livestock. Also for food. MesoAmericans and Southeast Asians domesticated for eating as livestock.
They shouldn't be, and agreed, biting humans, their pets, although sometimes it cannot be helped, or publicly, and in places of other people, attacking them. Unless that human is an idiot, trespassing, or being a senseless dickhead. There are far too many idiots to not get bitten with that many dogs they own. It should be discerning on the cause and affect, instead of simply kill the maneater, they really aren't, despite the fact they can kill.
I put my dog down in the end.
Food is food. Stop telling everybody else what to do. If you don't eat it, fine, your choice.
Why I support bloodsports, it's another's choice. I am fundamentally against giving these censors an inch today. Sick of their bullshit hypocrisy. Would I raise dogs to fight. No. But to guard, and hunt, undoubtedly if I had the land. I'd love to be a farmer somewhere remote and wild. Yes I'd keep dogs and livestock and horses. Get off my land.
You post simply to be viewed by others, and delete those posts. None of which contains pertinent information that can be used to locate you. Nor are your statements truly relevant to this propaganda piece.
I was just replying in context to the statement about “not training animals to kill each other” kinda thing. I think dogfighting is dumb, morally wrong— but sheepdogs kicking a coyote’s ass i have no problem with. Same for using them to hunt game, as long as you or your dog eats it or uses it constructively.
Though this thread is in fact about an actual crime of conspirators, it is not however a theory about one. Which is what makes it propaganda. Well, specifically, your title does such. As not even Info Wars would do as you have.
Pentagon Official Charged With Facilitating Dog Fighting Ring For More Than 20 Years
Man these people are scum
Curiously when did it get criminalised in America? I should look it up. A few decades in any majority? 2007 according to the Wiki. 15 years.
How many states is it criminalised? All? State Wide.
I am not going to justify the stance of this topic. It's grey. Do I agree with it. Debatable. Some dogs breeds haven't got any other purpose.
It isn't criminalised in much of South/Central America, has Mexico for example criminalised it? Cock/Bull/Scorpion and presumably dog isn't
Let me understand your oxymoron.
Our nature is the enslavement of something, potentially not me with mine, beating something over the head, forcing it to do what you want, according to your hypocritical notions of what you think it should do, to the point of unquestionable obedience? Welcome to dystopia.
How about feeding that pet kibble? It has killed it in about 15 years lower than its potential lifespan. Pet food is their main killer. Dogs the longest lived, 30-35, share one thing in common, they didn't eat kibble or any other pet food, except a natural diet, their owners prepared.
We have a responsibility to let nature be nature, preserve nature. Not cull something because wahaa it offends us.
Now you want to kill dogs because they're animals? Where does that stop? If cows cause climate change, surely the African Savannah has to go. But at the same time you want to ban hunting? Peak retard.
Look there's the moon, no animals, how about you go and colonise it. You will never stop our nature. It is conflict. Our season. Our wildlife. Our planet. Ourselves.
Deleting my former reply, I don't talk about me.
I am not being harsh. Just countering.
No, dogs probably like my former reply on the wild fox, it eats out of his hand, he says sit, it cocks its head like a dog, then it was beautiful, it did it, again and again. It had a set and one of the pups he's befriended, almost the same trust, others went back to the Wild, but they all like the food. Food was the bond and love. It comes to his door and paws the glass. It would almost go inside. Not there yet. Dunno he wants that. His wife might. They're not petting it yet, almost. The problem is that almost any other dog would kill it, including the chiwawa. Their nature.
It like the Wolf gave us the dog, millennia and millennia later we have a bunch of breeds.
Not all breeds are anything other than pets. But they're animals. Animals are not humans. They're wild and can all become so, even the most loyal or domesticated.
Yes they protect livestock, and shepherd them, although some, it's their nature will attack them all the same.
Dogs don't bite the hand that feeds, generally, they're one of the most loyal out of almost all pets, and intelligent. Because dogs are pack animals, not solitary, you're their packmaster, if you have their trust. It means looking after it. Not being a cunt.
To other dogs, and other animals, some breeds, and others not their packmaster, pack, beware.
We aren't talking about that. We are talking about is a lion killing a zebra cruel. Quick ban it off TV, feed the lion vegetables. Wahaaa.
Should dog fighting be banned. No. Not in the right environment, and registery. Why not capitalise off it. Keep it away from kids. They fight anyway, and to their natural extremes. Everything is cruel. Giving life is cruel.
Dogs were the result of domestication for hunting. Not just raising livestock. Also for food. MesoAmericans and Southeast Asians domesticated for eating as livestock.
They shouldn't be, and agreed, biting humans, their pets, although sometimes it cannot be helped, or publicly, and in places of other people, attacking them. Unless that human is an idiot, trespassing, or being a senseless dickhead. There are far too many idiots to not get bitten with that many dogs they own. It should be discerning on the cause and affect, instead of simply kill the maneater, they really aren't, despite the fact they can kill.
I put my dog down in the end.
Food is food. Stop telling everybody else what to do. If you don't eat it, fine, your choice.
Why I support bloodsports, it's another's choice. I am fundamentally against giving these censors an inch today. Sick of their bullshit hypocrisy. Would I raise dogs to fight. No. But to guard, and hunt, undoubtedly if I had the land. I'd love to be a farmer somewhere remote and wild. Yes I'd keep dogs and livestock and horses. Get off my land.
You post simply to be viewed by others, and delete those posts. None of which contains pertinent information that can be used to locate you. Nor are your statements truly relevant to this propaganda piece.
Well, before bullets were cheap, most hunting was done by dogs, who deal the lethal blows to the prey.
Fox hunting is still like that.
I was just replying in context to the statement about “not training animals to kill each other” kinda thing. I think dogfighting is dumb, morally wrong— but sheepdogs kicking a coyote’s ass i have no problem with. Same for using them to hunt game, as long as you or your dog eats it or uses it constructively.
Though this thread is in fact about an actual crime of conspirators, it is not however a theory about one. Which is what makes it propaganda. Well, specifically, your title does such. As not even Info Wars would do as you have.
That's the actual title.
Discrediting others by labeling them, sounds like a cucked moved to me.
It is clear to me, that I have no idea what you are trying to say to me in either of your previous replies.
Can you express to me why you felt the title needed to be altered?
Can you inform me as to why you chose to create a title different from the one of the article?
It’s the betting (mafia)
And the winning of bets (tax collectors)
The cruelty to animals, the state uses as propaganda. A trip to any modern slaughterhouse should result in charges being filed.
Unless you are hunting wild/feral game, You should hang an animal upside down and cut it’s main vein.