They'll have a few places.. first noticed it, the egyptian type obelisk, washington monument wasn't there. Then you got the capitol. The white house. But just any of these buildings around there. Meanwhile you see this outline of this area where they'll have everything as 3D.
Could be for security that (((they))) limit the data so the scary boogieman russians cannot plot a perfect attack or their scary Jan6th evil white nationalist nazi counterparts. Limit the enemy's knowledge of the terrain. In this case the enemy being the American people.
a) Each ORTHO (straight) GRAPHIC (described) PROJECT (thrown forwards) can only exist within TION (action), hence within ongoing motion...with ones perspective measuring (dimension) it from within.
b) Ones (1) consent to a description by another one (2) shapes the described into yet another one (3) unit within whole. Singular ones consent to another shapes duality; while the consented to suggestion shapes trinity...each distracting one from self.
They'll have a few places.. first noticed it, the egyptian type obelisk, washington monument wasn't there. Then you got the capitol. The white house. But just any of these buildings around there. Meanwhile you see this outline of this area where they'll have everything as 3D.
Could be for security that (((they))) limit the data so the scary boogieman russians cannot plot a perfect attack or their scary Jan6th evil white nationalist nazi counterparts. Limit the enemy's knowledge of the terrain. In this case the enemy being the American people.
Security was my first thought as well.
a) Each ORTHO (straight) GRAPHIC (described) PROJECT (thrown forwards) can only exist within TION (action), hence within ongoing motion...with ones perspective measuring (dimension) it from within.
b) Ones (1) consent to a description by another one (2) shapes the described into yet another one (3) unit within whole. Singular ones consent to another shapes duality; while the consented to suggestion shapes trinity...each distracting one from self.