Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

11
A large part of the New York ruling against Trump is that he misrepresented square footage of his property. A few years ago Louis Rossman showed that everyone lies about square footage in New York. Not one premises he looked at had an accurate square footage listing - always inflated. (youtu.be)
posted 2 years ago by clemaneuverers 2 years ago by clemaneuverers +13 / -2
11 comments share
11 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (11)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1
▲ 0 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

Also there should be a legal burden on the creditor to get independent appraisals if they are relying on any kind of collateral.

How can Trump be guilty of fraud if there is no one who has been defrauded and suffered a loss as a result?

Every politician who ever failed to fulfill a campaign promise is technically a fraud if we want to use emotional democrat standards for what fraud is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Eisenhorn 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

Are you implying that it's acceptable to commit fraud because many people do it?

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

Who was defrauded and what losses did they suffer?

How can Trump be guilty of a crime if there are no victims? Democrats living in fantasy land.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Eisenhorn -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

You could read the judge's ruling.

But you probably won't.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points 2 years ago +2 / -2

You are not a genuine contributor to this forum.

All you do is make smart ass comments to bash others' theories, or their opinions.

Yet you never offer up your own theories or opinions.

For example; You criticized and mocked people for their theories about the Covid vaccine shots. But then you dodged questions when I simply asked you if you got the shot or not.

You want to mock people for fascist theories but refuse to define fascism, name fascist nations, or even explain what system of government you believe you live under right now.

You're not really man enough to put your own theories up for review. You're too scared to list your own opinions. You are just a member of the peanut gallery waiting for an opportunity to throw popcorn. The kind of guy who attends these topics only to lash criticism at OP or someone in comment section. I can't criticize any of your theories or posts or opinions because you are too much of a coward to have any of your own and share them in a public forum such as this.

Did I come into this thread pretending to be a know it all? No. I simply asked a question. You are the one larping as a know-it-all. Did you read the judge's ruling? Then share the knowledge. Otherwise I think you are just larping. You'd rather spend 10x as much time arguing with me than a fraction of the time sharing valuable knowledge with people here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Lippy68 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Don't stress about him, he is probably just a paid shill.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Eisenhorn -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

The article OP links to literally calls a country fascist and explains why.

If you want to contribute to a discussion, make sure that you know what it is about.

Pathetic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

I am willing to bet if I went through all your home insurance policies from the last 25 years as well as your county and bank appraisals that they would not accurately report your home's actual square footage, which would make you guilty of fraud by these standards.

What constitutes fraud? If your insurance company asks you the last time you replaced the roof and you are a year off, then are you technically guilty of fraud?

What constitutes fraud in your opinion? Who is the victim of Trump's alleged fraud? What is the value of their losses due to this so-called fraud?

I am oracle. You won't answer because you never provide anything of value to this forum. Your posts are shit and you will respond 50 fucking times to argue but won't spend any time researching anything and sharing anything of value with anyone else here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Eisenhorn 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

I didn't make the ruling, why do you ask me? This makes no sense at all. Why are you trying to hold me responsible for a ruling a judge in the USA made?

Do you think I that judge? Are you ok?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Vlad_The_Impaler 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

The judge is a perverted kike jew. Jews have no place in the justice system except standing trial as defendants before they are convicted and swiftly impaled or gassed.

I do suspect you are part jewish. From your mother's side or father's side? Not that it matters much to me. You will avoid answering the question as usual.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy