All you do is make smart ass comments to bash others' theories, or their opinions.
Yet you never offer up your own theories or opinions.
For example; You criticized and mocked people for their theories about the Covid vaccine shots. But then you dodged questions when I simply asked you if you got the shot or not.
You want to mock people for fascist theories but refuse to define fascism, name fascist nations, or even explain what system of government you believe you live under right now.
You're not really man enough to put your own theories up for review. You're too scared to list your own opinions. You are just a member of the peanut gallery waiting for an opportunity to throw popcorn. The kind of guy who attends these topics only to lash criticism at OP or someone in comment section. I can't criticize any of your theories or posts or opinions because you are too much of a coward to have any of your own and share them in a public forum such as this.
Did I come into this thread pretending to be a know it all? No. I simply asked a question. You are the one larping as a know-it-all. Did you read the judge's ruling? Then share the knowledge. Otherwise I think you are just larping. You'd rather spend 10x as much time arguing with me than a fraction of the time sharing valuable knowledge with people here.
I am willing to bet if I went through all your home insurance policies from the last 25 years as well as your county and bank appraisals that they would not accurately report your home's actual square footage, which would make you guilty of fraud by these standards.
What constitutes fraud? If your insurance company asks you the last time you replaced the roof and you are a year off, then are you technically guilty of fraud?
What constitutes fraud in your opinion? Who is the victim of Trump's alleged fraud? What is the value of their losses due to this so-called fraud?
I am oracle. You won't answer because you never provide anything of value to this forum. Your posts are shit and you will respond 50 fucking times to argue but won't spend any time researching anything and sharing anything of value with anyone else here.
I didn't make the ruling, why do you ask me? This makes no sense at all. Why are you trying to hold me responsible for a ruling a judge in the USA made?
You could read the judge's ruling.
But you probably won't.
You are not a genuine contributor to this forum.
All you do is make smart ass comments to bash others' theories, or their opinions.
Yet you never offer up your own theories or opinions.
For example; You criticized and mocked people for their theories about the Covid vaccine shots. But then you dodged questions when I simply asked you if you got the shot or not.
You want to mock people for fascist theories but refuse to define fascism, name fascist nations, or even explain what system of government you believe you live under right now.
You're not really man enough to put your own theories up for review. You're too scared to list your own opinions. You are just a member of the peanut gallery waiting for an opportunity to throw popcorn. The kind of guy who attends these topics only to lash criticism at OP or someone in comment section. I can't criticize any of your theories or posts or opinions because you are too much of a coward to have any of your own and share them in a public forum such as this.
Did I come into this thread pretending to be a know it all? No. I simply asked a question. You are the one larping as a know-it-all. Did you read the judge's ruling? Then share the knowledge. Otherwise I think you are just larping. You'd rather spend 10x as much time arguing with me than a fraction of the time sharing valuable knowledge with people here.
Don't stress about him, he is probably just a paid shill.
The article OP links to literally calls a country fascist and explains why.
If you want to contribute to a discussion, make sure that you know what it is about.
Pathetic.
I am willing to bet if I went through all your home insurance policies from the last 25 years as well as your county and bank appraisals that they would not accurately report your home's actual square footage, which would make you guilty of fraud by these standards.
What constitutes fraud? If your insurance company asks you the last time you replaced the roof and you are a year off, then are you technically guilty of fraud?
What constitutes fraud in your opinion? Who is the victim of Trump's alleged fraud? What is the value of their losses due to this so-called fraud?
I am oracle. You won't answer because you never provide anything of value to this forum. Your posts are shit and you will respond 50 fucking times to argue but won't spend any time researching anything and sharing anything of value with anyone else here.
I didn't make the ruling, why do you ask me? This makes no sense at all. Why are you trying to hold me responsible for a ruling a judge in the USA made?
Do you think I that judge? Are you ok?